Application of multivariate geostatistical methods and risk indexes to identify dump sites and assess risks in historical mining areas.

IF 3.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Luis Rodríguez, Beatriz González-Corrochano, Francisco J López-Bellido, Francisco J Fernández-Morales, José Villaseñor, Jacinto Alonso-Azcárate
{"title":"Application of multivariate geostatistical methods and risk indexes to identify dump sites and assess risks in historical mining areas.","authors":"Luis Rodríguez, Beatriz González-Corrochano, Francisco J López-Bellido, Francisco J Fernández-Morales, José Villaseñor, Jacinto Alonso-Azcárate","doi":"10.1007/s10653-025-02628-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historical mining areas can lead to long-term soil and water contamination, necessitating their delineation, characterization, and environmental risk assessment. This study utilized a combination of environmental forensic tools (geospatial and statistical analysis techniques) along with a fairly set of standardized risk indices to find the exact location of the old mining waste dumps existing in a historical Pb/Ag mining area and to assess the current environmental risk derived from it. The results indicated that Pb is the most prevalent potentially toxic element, with concentrations significantly exceeding regional background levels. Zn and Cu also exhibited high concentrations, while Ag levels were relatively low. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified six factors associating different metals with geochemical background and mining activities. Several pollution risk indices were employed to evaluate environmental hazards. Pb posed the highest risk, with approximately 75% of samples falling into high-risk categories based on total concentrations (Geoaccumulation Index and Enrichment Factor). Other metals such as Cd, Zn and Cu displayed varying risk levels, whereas Ag posed minimal risk. The Pollution Loading Index (PLI) indicated that around half of samples were highly polluted. However, indices considering bioavailable metals (Risk Assessment Code, RAC) suggested a much lower risk, with only Cd showing moderate risk in 11.1% of samples; the relatively abundant vegetation in the area seems to provide additional evidence for this last consideration. The spatial distribution of sample types, combined with risk indices maps and photogrammetry, facilitated the creation of a 3D map of potential old mining waste dumps using reasonable time work and costs. That integration of techniques and data, together with the great antiquity of some mining activities conducted in the studied area, constitute the main novelty of this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"47 8","pages":"311"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02628-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historical mining areas can lead to long-term soil and water contamination, necessitating their delineation, characterization, and environmental risk assessment. This study utilized a combination of environmental forensic tools (geospatial and statistical analysis techniques) along with a fairly set of standardized risk indices to find the exact location of the old mining waste dumps existing in a historical Pb/Ag mining area and to assess the current environmental risk derived from it. The results indicated that Pb is the most prevalent potentially toxic element, with concentrations significantly exceeding regional background levels. Zn and Cu also exhibited high concentrations, while Ag levels were relatively low. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified six factors associating different metals with geochemical background and mining activities. Several pollution risk indices were employed to evaluate environmental hazards. Pb posed the highest risk, with approximately 75% of samples falling into high-risk categories based on total concentrations (Geoaccumulation Index and Enrichment Factor). Other metals such as Cd, Zn and Cu displayed varying risk levels, whereas Ag posed minimal risk. The Pollution Loading Index (PLI) indicated that around half of samples were highly polluted. However, indices considering bioavailable metals (Risk Assessment Code, RAC) suggested a much lower risk, with only Cd showing moderate risk in 11.1% of samples; the relatively abundant vegetation in the area seems to provide additional evidence for this last consideration. The spatial distribution of sample types, combined with risk indices maps and photogrammetry, facilitated the creation of a 3D map of potential old mining waste dumps using reasonable time work and costs. That integration of techniques and data, together with the great antiquity of some mining activities conducted in the studied area, constitute the main novelty of this work.

应用多元地质统计方法及风险指数识别历史矿区排土场及风险评价。
历史上的矿区可能导致长期的土壤和水污染,因此有必要对其进行划定、描述和环境风险评估。本研究结合环境取证工具(地理空间和统计分析技术)以及一套相当标准化的风险指标,找到了历史铅银矿区存在的旧采矿废物倾倒场的确切位置,并评估了由此产生的当前环境风险。结果表明,铅是最普遍的潜在毒性元素,其浓度显著超过区域背景水平。Zn和Cu的含量也较高,Ag的含量相对较低。主成分分析(PCA)确定了将不同金属与地球化学背景和采矿活动联系起来的六个因素。采用几种污染风险指标对环境危害进行评价。铅的风险最高,根据总浓度(地质积累指数和富集系数),约75%的样品属于高风险类别。其他金属如镉、锌和铜显示出不同的风险水平,而银的风险最低。污染负荷指数(PLI)显示,约一半的样本受到严重污染。然而,考虑生物可利用金属的指标(风险评估代码,RAC)表明风险要低得多,只有11.1%的样品中镉显示中等风险;该地区相对丰富的植被似乎为最后一个考虑提供了额外的证据。样本类型的空间分布,结合风险指数地图和摄影测量,在合理的时间和成本下,促进了潜在旧采矿废物堆的3D地图的创建。技术和数据的结合,加上在研究地区进行的一些采矿活动非常古老,构成了这项工作的主要新颖之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Environmental Geochemistry and Health 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people. Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes. The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信