A Comparative Review of Methods for Detecting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Cell-Free DNA from Lung Cancer Patients.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sepideh Shohani, Mahmood Barati, Arshad Hosseini
{"title":"A Comparative Review of Methods for Detecting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Cell-Free DNA from Lung Cancer Patients.","authors":"Sepideh Shohani, Mahmood Barati, Arshad Hosseini","doi":"10.2174/0115665240374769250703232841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Determining the T790M resistance variants and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is crucial for personalized treatment, especially when using targeted therapies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review article aims to comprehensively compare some of the various diagnostic techniques associated with liquid biopsies, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for T790M and EGFR mutant identification. It also aims to evaluate their pertinence in clinical settings, as well as their sensitivity and specificity to determine how effectively they monitor treatment response and resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The keyword list included \"EGFR mutations,\" \"T790M resistance,\" \"liquid biopsy,\" \"COLD PCR,\" \"NGS,\" \"ddPCR,\" \"BEAMing,\" and other methods. The effect of these studies on diagnostic technologies for identifying EGFR mutations was assessed in terms of clinical practice, methodological accuracy, and significance. Sensitivity, specificity, clinical applicability, cost analysis, turnaround times, and ease of integration into clinical workflows were used as parameters for evaluation based on the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are advantages and disadvantages to cfDNA monitoring strategies for treatment response and resistance, as well as to the assessment of sensitivity, specificity, and clinical applicability for identifying EGFR mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced techniques such as COLD-PCR, LC-MS, qPCR, NGS sequencing, Sanger sequencing, PNA microarrays, the Allele-Specific Competitive Extension (ASCE) real-time PCR assay, and nanopore technology are necessary for personalized lung cancer management. However, depending on the objective of the work, the suitable method should be selected based on its benefits and drawbacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10873,"journal":{"name":"Current molecular medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current molecular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115665240374769250703232841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Determining the T790M resistance variants and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is crucial for personalized treatment, especially when using targeted therapies.

Objective: This review article aims to comprehensively compare some of the various diagnostic techniques associated with liquid biopsies, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for T790M and EGFR mutant identification. It also aims to evaluate their pertinence in clinical settings, as well as their sensitivity and specificity to determine how effectively they monitor treatment response and resistance.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The keyword list included "EGFR mutations," "T790M resistance," "liquid biopsy," "COLD PCR," "NGS," "ddPCR," "BEAMing," and other methods. The effect of these studies on diagnostic technologies for identifying EGFR mutations was assessed in terms of clinical practice, methodological accuracy, and significance. Sensitivity, specificity, clinical applicability, cost analysis, turnaround times, and ease of integration into clinical workflows were used as parameters for evaluation based on the literature.

Results: There are advantages and disadvantages to cfDNA monitoring strategies for treatment response and resistance, as well as to the assessment of sensitivity, specificity, and clinical applicability for identifying EGFR mutations.

Conclusion: Advanced techniques such as COLD-PCR, LC-MS, qPCR, NGS sequencing, Sanger sequencing, PNA microarrays, the Allele-Specific Competitive Extension (ASCE) real-time PCR assay, and nanopore technology are necessary for personalized lung cancer management. However, depending on the objective of the work, the suitable method should be selected based on its benefits and drawbacks.

肺癌患者游离DNA中表皮生长因子受体突变检测方法的比较综述。
背景:肺癌仍然是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。确定T790M耐药变异和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变对于个性化治疗至关重要,特别是在使用靶向治疗时。目的:本文旨在全面比较一些与液体活检相关的各种诊断技术,如游离DNA (cfDNA)检测T790M和EGFR突变体鉴定。它还旨在评估它们在临床环境中的针对性,以及它们的敏感性和特异性,以确定它们如何有效地监测治疗反应和耐药性。方法:利用PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science等数据库进行文献检索。关键词列表包括“EGFR突变”、“T790M耐药”、“液体活检”、“COLD PCR”、“NGS”、“ddPCR”、“BEAMing”等方法。这些研究对识别EGFR突变的诊断技术的影响在临床实践、方法准确性和重要性方面进行了评估。敏感性、特异性、临床适用性、成本分析、周转时间和融入临床工作流程的便利性被用作基于文献的评估参数。结果:cfDNA监测策略在治疗反应和耐药方面,以及在识别EGFR突变的敏感性、特异性和临床适用性评估方面各有优缺点。结论:COLD-PCR、LC-MS、qPCR、NGS测序、Sanger测序、PNA微阵列、等位基因特异性竞争扩展(ASCE)实时PCR、纳米孔技术等先进技术是肺癌个性化管理的必要手段。然而,根据工作的目标,应该根据其优点和缺点选择合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current molecular medicine
Current molecular medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
141
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Molecular Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal focused on providing the readership with current and comprehensive reviews/ mini-reviews, original research articles, short communications/letters and drug clinical trial studies on fundamental molecular mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, the development of molecular-diagnosis and/or novel approaches to rational treatment. The reviews should be of significant interest to basic researchers and clinical investigators in molecular medicine. Periodically the journal invites guest editors to devote an issue on a basic research area that shows promise to advance our understanding of the molecular mechanism(s) of a disease or has potential for clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信