Therapeutic excision results in benign and borderline breast lesions by the breast lesion excision system (BLES)

Mirsad Yalcinkaya , Mehmet Ali Nazlı , Canan Kelten Talu , Gultekin Ozan Kucuk , Ozgur Kılıckesmez
{"title":"Therapeutic excision results in benign and borderline breast lesions by the breast lesion excision system (BLES)","authors":"Mirsad Yalcinkaya ,&nbsp;Mehmet Ali Nazlı ,&nbsp;Canan Kelten Talu ,&nbsp;Gultekin Ozan Kucuk ,&nbsp;Ozgur Kılıckesmez","doi":"10.1016/j.ibreh.2025.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Breast lesion excision system (BLES) is an alternative biopsy method that allows large specimens to be received from the tissue.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic results of the biopsies performed breast lesions using the BLES.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 23 patients who underwent biopsy with the BLES between January 2014 and December 2016. All of the relevant procedures were performed under local anesthesia. After the procedure, the excision site was closely observed using ultrasonography and analyzed for macroscopic residual lesions. All specimens were evaluated using the diagnostic or therapeutic accuracy or safety of BLES.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean lesion size was 11.3 ± 4.4 mm. The size was ≤10 mm in 11 patients, and between 10 mm and 20 mm in 12 patients. Pathologic evaluation could not be performed in 1 patient due to an empty basket. According to the first BLES procedure, in the patient group with a target lesion size ≤10 mm, complete removal was achieved in 9 patients (90.0 %) and incomplete removal in 1 patient (10.0 %). In the patient group with a target lesion size between 10 mm and 20 mm, complete removal was achieved in 5 patients (42 %) and incomplete removal in 7 patients (58 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.019). No complications such as bleeding, hematoma, or infection were detected in our study.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>BLES is a minimally invasive, safe and effective alternative to surgical excision, especially in suitable sizes, as it does not require general anesthesia and can be done as an outpatient procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100675,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Practice in Breast Health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Practice in Breast Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950212825000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Breast lesion excision system (BLES) is an alternative biopsy method that allows large specimens to be received from the tissue.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic results of the biopsies performed breast lesions using the BLES.

Methods

The study included 23 patients who underwent biopsy with the BLES between January 2014 and December 2016. All of the relevant procedures were performed under local anesthesia. After the procedure, the excision site was closely observed using ultrasonography and analyzed for macroscopic residual lesions. All specimens were evaluated using the diagnostic or therapeutic accuracy or safety of BLES.

Results

The mean lesion size was 11.3 ± 4.4 mm. The size was ≤10 mm in 11 patients, and between 10 mm and 20 mm in 12 patients. Pathologic evaluation could not be performed in 1 patient due to an empty basket. According to the first BLES procedure, in the patient group with a target lesion size ≤10 mm, complete removal was achieved in 9 patients (90.0 %) and incomplete removal in 1 patient (10.0 %). In the patient group with a target lesion size between 10 mm and 20 mm, complete removal was achieved in 5 patients (42 %) and incomplete removal in 7 patients (58 %) (p = 0.019). No complications such as bleeding, hematoma, or infection were detected in our study.

Conclusion

BLES is a minimally invasive, safe and effective alternative to surgical excision, especially in suitable sizes, as it does not require general anesthesia and can be done as an outpatient procedure.
乳腺病变切除系统(BLES)对乳腺良性和交界性病变进行治疗性切除。
背景:乳腺病变切除系统(BLES)是一种可选择的活检方法,允许从组织中接受大标本。目的探讨BLES对乳腺病变活检的治疗效果。方法本研究纳入了2014年1月至2016年12月期间接受BLES活检的23例患者。所有相关手术均在局麻下进行。术后用超声密切观察切除部位,并分析肉眼残余病灶。所有标本均采用BLES诊断或治疗的准确性或安全性进行评估。结果平均病变大小为11.3±4.4 mm。直径≤10 mm者11例,10 ~ 20 mm者12例。1例患者因空篮而无法进行病理评估。根据第一次BLES手术,在目标病变大小≤10 mm的患者组中,9例(90.0%)患者完全切除,1例(10.0%)患者不完全切除。靶病灶大小在10 ~ 20 mm的患者组中,完全切除5例(42%),不完全切除7例(58%)(p = 0.019)。在我们的研究中没有发现出血、血肿或感染等并发症。结论bles无需全身麻醉,可作为门诊手术,是一种微创、安全、有效的手术切除替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信