{"title":"A latent profile analysis of emotional intelligence and its relationship with L2 student writing feedback literacy","authors":"Zaibo Long, Ran Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has highlighted the critical role of the affective dimension in shaping L2 student writing feedback literacy; however, limited attention has been given to how emotional intelligence (EI), conceptualized as a constellation of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions, influences L2 student writers' feedback literacy. To fill this gap, this study investigated the relationship between students' EI and L2 writing feedback literacy by exploring how different EI patterns relate to variations in feedback literacy. A sample of 426 students in Chinese higher education institutions was administered the L2 Student Writing Feedback Literacy Scale and the short-form Trait EI Scale. Four EI profiles were identified through latent profile analysis (LPA): Low Emotionality Group, Average Balanced Group, Moderately Low Emotionality Group, and High Stable Group. ANOVA and Welch's Tests revealed significant differences in L2 student writing feedback literacy across most EI profiles. By examining the configuration of dimensions within these profiles, we identified an EI configuration that creates favorable conditions for developing L2 writing feedback literacy in a Chinese higher education context: a combination of lower emotionality, higher well-being, and greater self-control. Implications for L2 writing instruction were discussed based on the findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103773"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous research has highlighted the critical role of the affective dimension in shaping L2 student writing feedback literacy; however, limited attention has been given to how emotional intelligence (EI), conceptualized as a constellation of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions, influences L2 student writers' feedback literacy. To fill this gap, this study investigated the relationship between students' EI and L2 writing feedback literacy by exploring how different EI patterns relate to variations in feedback literacy. A sample of 426 students in Chinese higher education institutions was administered the L2 Student Writing Feedback Literacy Scale and the short-form Trait EI Scale. Four EI profiles were identified through latent profile analysis (LPA): Low Emotionality Group, Average Balanced Group, Moderately Low Emotionality Group, and High Stable Group. ANOVA and Welch's Tests revealed significant differences in L2 student writing feedback literacy across most EI profiles. By examining the configuration of dimensions within these profiles, we identified an EI configuration that creates favorable conditions for developing L2 writing feedback literacy in a Chinese higher education context: a combination of lower emotionality, higher well-being, and greater self-control. Implications for L2 writing instruction were discussed based on the findings.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.