Contraceptive Concordance

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Sarah Vincent, Catalina Herrera‐Almanza, S. Anukriti, Mahesh Karra
{"title":"Contraceptive Concordance","authors":"Sarah Vincent, Catalina Herrera‐Almanza, S. Anukriti, Mahesh Karra","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an indicator of contraceptive concordance that identifies the alignment between stated preferences for contraception and concurrent contraceptive behavior. Our indicator departs from traditional approaches to measurement in family planning that infer concordance to be the alignment between women's contraceptive (non‐)use and their fertility preferences. We estimate our indicator using data from a cross‐sectional survey that was conducted with 1,958 married women in rural India. More than half of all women in our sample (51.2 percent) report that they are currently using a contraceptive method. More than three in five women (60.8 percent) were classified as wanting to use a contraceptive method at the time of the survey. We find that 60 percent of women in our sample are classified to be concordant (either wanted users or wanted nonusers), while almost 1 in 4 women (24.8 percent) state a preference for using contraception but are not users (unwanted nonusers), and 15.2 percent of women in our sample state a preference for not using contraception but are users (unwanted users). We discuss the comparative advantages and limitations of our approach relative to traditional measures and other recently developed indicators.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"158 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose an indicator of contraceptive concordance that identifies the alignment between stated preferences for contraception and concurrent contraceptive behavior. Our indicator departs from traditional approaches to measurement in family planning that infer concordance to be the alignment between women's contraceptive (non‐)use and their fertility preferences. We estimate our indicator using data from a cross‐sectional survey that was conducted with 1,958 married women in rural India. More than half of all women in our sample (51.2 percent) report that they are currently using a contraceptive method. More than three in five women (60.8 percent) were classified as wanting to use a contraceptive method at the time of the survey. We find that 60 percent of women in our sample are classified to be concordant (either wanted users or wanted nonusers), while almost 1 in 4 women (24.8 percent) state a preference for using contraception but are not users (unwanted nonusers), and 15.2 percent of women in our sample state a preference for not using contraception but are users (unwanted users). We discuss the comparative advantages and limitations of our approach relative to traditional measures and other recently developed indicators.
避孕一致性
我们提出了一种避孕一致性指标,该指标确定了避孕偏好和同时避孕行为之间的一致性。我们的指标偏离了传统的计划生育测量方法,即推断一致性是妇女避孕(非)使用与其生育偏好之间的一致性。我们使用对印度农村1958名已婚妇女进行的横断面调查的数据来估计我们的指标。在我们的样本中,超过一半的妇女(51.2%)报告说她们目前正在使用一种避孕方法。超过五分之三(60.8%)的女性在调查时被归类为想要使用避孕方法。我们发现样本中60%的女性被分类为“一致”(要么是想要的使用者,要么是想要的非使用者),而几乎四分之一的女性(24.8%)表示倾向于使用避孕措施,但不是使用者(不想要的非使用者),我们样本中15.2%的女性表示倾向于不使用避孕措施,但是使用者(不想要的使用者)。我们讨论了相对于传统措施和其他最近发展的指标,我们的方法的比较优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信