Karen E Brokke,Manon Graman,Sjoerd Servaas,Inger N Sierevelt,Monique A H Steegers,Peter A Nolte
{"title":"Bone cement implantation syndrome: a scoping review.","authors":"Karen E Brokke,Manon Graman,Sjoerd Servaas,Inger N Sierevelt,Monique A H Steegers,Peter A Nolte","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nBone cement implantation syndrome comprises the occurrence of hypoxaemia, hypotension, unexpected loss of consciousness, or cardiac arrest occurring around the time of cementation, prosthesis insertion, or reduction of the joint in arthroplasty. As the yearly number of arthroplasties will increase, the number of complications including bone cement implantation syndrome is also expected to increase. Therefore, a good understanding of this syndrome is important. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge of bone cement implantation syndrome.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis scoping review was conducted based on the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. A literature search was done in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. A total of 85 studies were included in the study.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe incidence of bone cement implantation syndrome during cemented hip or knee arthroplasty varied from 15.4% to 46.7% and 27.5% to 70.7%, respectively. The incidence in shoulder arthroplasty was 16.2%. In uncemented hip arthroplasty, the incidence ranged from 0.0% to 21.8%. Risk factors identified for bone cement implantation syndrome included advanced age, ASA physical status 3 or 4, and primary lung cancer or lung metastasis.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBone cement implantation syndrome is a potentially severe complication that can occur during both cemented and uncemented arthroplasty. Moreover, the occurrence of bone cement implantation syndrome is not dependent on the use of cement. However, the severity does seem to have an association with the fixation method.","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Bone cement implantation syndrome comprises the occurrence of hypoxaemia, hypotension, unexpected loss of consciousness, or cardiac arrest occurring around the time of cementation, prosthesis insertion, or reduction of the joint in arthroplasty. As the yearly number of arthroplasties will increase, the number of complications including bone cement implantation syndrome is also expected to increase. Therefore, a good understanding of this syndrome is important. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge of bone cement implantation syndrome.
METHODS
This scoping review was conducted based on the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. A literature search was done in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. A total of 85 studies were included in the study.
RESULTS
The incidence of bone cement implantation syndrome during cemented hip or knee arthroplasty varied from 15.4% to 46.7% and 27.5% to 70.7%, respectively. The incidence in shoulder arthroplasty was 16.2%. In uncemented hip arthroplasty, the incidence ranged from 0.0% to 21.8%. Risk factors identified for bone cement implantation syndrome included advanced age, ASA physical status 3 or 4, and primary lung cancer or lung metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS
Bone cement implantation syndrome is a potentially severe complication that can occur during both cemented and uncemented arthroplasty. Moreover, the occurrence of bone cement implantation syndrome is not dependent on the use of cement. However, the severity does seem to have an association with the fixation method.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.