Post-traumatic visual sequelae from a forensic medicine perspective: A retrospective analysis of 10 years of data.

IF 1
Çağdaş Savaş, Nazlıcan Aras, Tayfun Yeşilbalkan, İsmail Özgür Can
{"title":"Post-traumatic visual sequelae from a forensic medicine perspective: A retrospective analysis of 10 years of data.","authors":"Çağdaş Savaş, Nazlıcan Aras, Tayfun Yeşilbalkan, İsmail Özgür Can","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.54778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vision is one of the most fundamental functions required for a quality life. In this context, eye trauma is frequently subject to medico-legal evaluation to determine both the severity of the injury and the presence of any sequelae, and, if present, the extent of visual function loss. This study examines the medico-legal assessment process following ocular trauma. The aim is to reduce potential confusion by providing explanations that offer standardization and guidance in forensic assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2024, the files and reports of 210 cases (210 eyes) were retrospectively analyzed. These cases involved forensic medico-legal assessments conducted by the Department of Forensic Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, focusing on the severity of the injury and the presence of visual function impairment or loss following eye trauma in the context of criminal proceedings. Sociodemographic data, type and cause of trauma, initial diagnosis, classification of injury according to the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS), anatomical site of injury, injury severity, and whether visual function impairment or loss had occurred were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 29.0 software package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 210 patients, 171 (81.4%) were male and 39 (18.6%) were female. Ocular trauma was most frequently observed in the 19-30 age group (n=62, 29.5%). There were 157 (74.8%) closed globe injuries and 53 (25.2%) open globe injuries. Subconjunctival hemorrhage (n=132, 62.9%) was the most common finding at the initial ophthalmological examination following trauma. An injury outside Zone 1 was identified as the strongest negative prognostic factor for visual impairment or loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From a forensic medicine perspective, eye trauma alone is not considered a life-threatening condition. However, a multidisciplinary approach, including forensic medicine specialists and ophthalmologists, should be adopted in the assessment of visual sequelae, that is, the impairment or loss of visual function, following eye trauma related to criminal proceedings. First, it must be determined whether the healing process is complete and whether there is a causal link between the trauma and vision loss. Once healing is complete, the visual function of each eye should be assessed individually. The assessment method should be chosen based on whether visual acuity loss, visual field defects, or any other diagnoses are present in one eye alone or in both eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 7","pages":"682-690"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.54778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vision is one of the most fundamental functions required for a quality life. In this context, eye trauma is frequently subject to medico-legal evaluation to determine both the severity of the injury and the presence of any sequelae, and, if present, the extent of visual function loss. This study examines the medico-legal assessment process following ocular trauma. The aim is to reduce potential confusion by providing explanations that offer standardization and guidance in forensic assessments.

Methods: Between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2024, the files and reports of 210 cases (210 eyes) were retrospectively analyzed. These cases involved forensic medico-legal assessments conducted by the Department of Forensic Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, focusing on the severity of the injury and the presence of visual function impairment or loss following eye trauma in the context of criminal proceedings. Sociodemographic data, type and cause of trauma, initial diagnosis, classification of injury according to the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS), anatomical site of injury, injury severity, and whether visual function impairment or loss had occurred were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 29.0 software package.

Results: Of the 210 patients, 171 (81.4%) were male and 39 (18.6%) were female. Ocular trauma was most frequently observed in the 19-30 age group (n=62, 29.5%). There were 157 (74.8%) closed globe injuries and 53 (25.2%) open globe injuries. Subconjunctival hemorrhage (n=132, 62.9%) was the most common finding at the initial ophthalmological examination following trauma. An injury outside Zone 1 was identified as the strongest negative prognostic factor for visual impairment or loss.

Conclusion: From a forensic medicine perspective, eye trauma alone is not considered a life-threatening condition. However, a multidisciplinary approach, including forensic medicine specialists and ophthalmologists, should be adopted in the assessment of visual sequelae, that is, the impairment or loss of visual function, following eye trauma related to criminal proceedings. First, it must be determined whether the healing process is complete and whether there is a causal link between the trauma and vision loss. Once healing is complete, the visual function of each eye should be assessed individually. The assessment method should be chosen based on whether visual acuity loss, visual field defects, or any other diagnoses are present in one eye alone or in both eyes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从法医学角度看创伤后视觉后遗症:对10年资料的回顾性分析。
背景:视觉是高质量生活所需的最基本功能之一。在这种情况下,眼外伤通常需要进行医学-法律评估,以确定损伤的严重程度和是否存在任何后遗症,如果存在,还要确定视力丧失的程度。本研究探讨眼外伤后的医学-法律评估过程。其目的是通过提供解释,为法医评估提供标准化和指导,从而减少潜在的混淆。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月1日至2024年1月1日210例(210眼)的临床资料和报告。这些案件涉及由多库兹·埃鲁尔大学医学院法医学系进行的法医-法律评估,重点是在刑事诉讼中受伤的严重程度以及是否存在视觉功能受损或眼外伤后视力丧失。评估社会人口统计数据、创伤类型和原因、初步诊断、根据伯明翰眼外伤术语系统(BETTS)进行的损伤分类、损伤解剖部位、损伤严重程度以及是否发生视觉功能损害或丧失。采用IBM SPSS 29.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果:210例患者中,男性171例(81.4%),女性39例(18.6%)。眼部外伤在19-30岁年龄组最为常见(n=62, 29.5%)。闭合性球损伤157例(74.8%),开放性球损伤53例(25.2%)。结膜下出血(n=132, 62.9%)是创伤后首次眼科检查中最常见的发现。第1区以外的损伤被认为是视力损害或丧失的最强负面预后因素。结论:从法医学的角度来看,眼外伤本身不被认为是危及生命的疾病。然而,在评估与刑事诉讼有关的眼外伤后的视觉后遗症,即视觉功能受损或丧失时,应采用包括法医专家和眼科医生在内的多学科方法。首先,必须确定愈合过程是否完整,以及创伤和视力丧失之间是否存在因果关系。一旦愈合完成,每只眼睛的视觉功能应单独评估。评估方法应根据是否有单眼或双眼视力下降、视野缺损或任何其他诊断来选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信