Effect of intraperitoneal hypochlorous acid (HOCl) on bacterial translocation in an experimental peritonitis model in rats.

IF 1
Ahmet Contarlı, Ismail Zihni, Mümtaz Cem Şirin
{"title":"Effect of intraperitoneal hypochlorous acid (HOCl) on bacterial translocation in an experimental peritonitis model in rats.","authors":"Ahmet Contarlı, Ismail Zihni, Mümtaz Cem Şirin","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.51759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the effects of saline, routinely used for intra-abdominal irrigation, with hypochlorous acid (HOCl), which we believe could be suitable for clinical practice in the future, on bacterial translocation in a rat model of peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four groups were formed: Sham, Control, cecal ligation and puncture with saline (CLP+SF), and cecal ligation and puncture with hypochlorous acid (CLP+HA), with 11 rats in each group, for a total of 44 rats. One rat in the Control group died and was excluded from the study. The comparison focused on saline, which is routinely used for intra-abdominal irrigation, and HOCl, which is considered a potential option for future clinical use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was observed between the CLP+SF and CLP+HA groups in liver, spleen, and mesenteric lymph node tissue cultures (p<0.001, p=0.004, and p=0.001, respectively). However, no significant difference was found between the CLP+SF and CLP+HA groups in blood cultures (p=0.181). Although bacterial growth in blood cultures was numerically lower in the CLP+HA group, the absence of statistical significance between the CLP+HA group and other groups was attributed to the limited sample size and the short duration of the experimental peritonitis/sepsis model. Additionally, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results from blood samples showed that the mean levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), both inflammatory markers, did not differ significantly among the groups. This indicates that HOCl significantly reduced bacterial translocation without suppressing the inflammatory response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is predicted that the widespread use of HOCl in clinical practice could reduce mortality and morbidity in cases of perforation-induced peritonitis of intra-abdominal sepsis, shorten hospital stays, lower the cost of medical treatment, and contribute to the national economy in the healthcare sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 7","pages":"603-611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.51759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study compared the effects of saline, routinely used for intra-abdominal irrigation, with hypochlorous acid (HOCl), which we believe could be suitable for clinical practice in the future, on bacterial translocation in a rat model of peritonitis.

Methods: Four groups were formed: Sham, Control, cecal ligation and puncture with saline (CLP+SF), and cecal ligation and puncture with hypochlorous acid (CLP+HA), with 11 rats in each group, for a total of 44 rats. One rat in the Control group died and was excluded from the study. The comparison focused on saline, which is routinely used for intra-abdominal irrigation, and HOCl, which is considered a potential option for future clinical use.

Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the CLP+SF and CLP+HA groups in liver, spleen, and mesenteric lymph node tissue cultures (p<0.001, p=0.004, and p=0.001, respectively). However, no significant difference was found between the CLP+SF and CLP+HA groups in blood cultures (p=0.181). Although bacterial growth in blood cultures was numerically lower in the CLP+HA group, the absence of statistical significance between the CLP+HA group and other groups was attributed to the limited sample size and the short duration of the experimental peritonitis/sepsis model. Additionally, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results from blood samples showed that the mean levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), both inflammatory markers, did not differ significantly among the groups. This indicates that HOCl significantly reduced bacterial translocation without suppressing the inflammatory response.

Conclusion: It is predicted that the widespread use of HOCl in clinical practice could reduce mortality and morbidity in cases of perforation-induced peritonitis of intra-abdominal sepsis, shorten hospital stays, lower the cost of medical treatment, and contribute to the national economy in the healthcare sector.

腹腔注射次氯酸(HOCl)对大鼠实验性腹膜炎模型细菌易位的影响。
背景:本研究比较了常规用于腹腔内冲洗的生理盐水与次氯酸(HOCl)对大鼠腹膜炎模型中细菌易位的影响,我们认为次氯酸(HOCl)可能适用于未来的临床实践。方法:将大鼠分为假手术组、对照组、生理盐水结扎穿刺组(CLP+SF)和次氯酸结扎穿刺组(CLP+HA),每组11只,共44只。对照组1只大鼠死亡,被排除在研究之外。比较的重点是生理盐水和HOCl,前者通常用于腹腔内冲洗,后者被认为是未来临床使用的潜在选择。结果:CLP+SF组与CLP+HA组在肝、脾、肠系膜淋巴结组织培养中差异有统计学意义(p)结论:预测HOCl在临床的广泛应用可降低腹内脓毒症穿孔性腹膜炎的病死率和发病率,缩短住院时间,降低医疗费用,在医疗卫生领域为国民经济做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信