Systematic Review of Second-Generation Antidepressant Monotherapy for Acute Bipolar-II Depression.

Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2025-07-04
Ahmed Elmosalamy, Nicola Keeth, Jin Hong Park, Danielle J Gerberi, Susan L McElroy, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh
{"title":"Systematic Review of Second-Generation Antidepressant Monotherapy for Acute Bipolar-II Depression.","authors":"Ahmed Elmosalamy, Nicola Keeth, Jin Hong Park, Danielle J Gerberi, Susan L McElroy, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Individuals with Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) face high rates of depression and have limited FDA-approved treatments, leading to treatment delays and poor functioning. Although not commonly recommended, monoaminergic antidepressants are prescribed to 50% of patients. This review updates the evidence for second-generation antidepressant (SGAD) monotherapy in treating acute BD-II depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science from March 2021 to February 2025 and included five studies published before 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGAD monotherapy in adults with acute BD-II depression. Primary outcomes were response, remission, treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS), dropouts owing to adverse events (AEs), and overall discontinuations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 949 records identified, 12 studies were selected for full-text assessment, and six were included in our systematic review. The final dataset comprised four double-blind RCTs (n = 533), one open-label RCT (n = 83), and one triple-blind RCT (n = 40). Venlafaxine and sertraline produced short-term benefits, with response rates 60.4%-73.3% and remission rates 44.2%-58.5%. TEAS risk was ⩽ 19.9% and did not differ from lithium in head-to-head comparisons. AEs withdrawals were similar; SGADs often had comparable or better all-cause discontinuation than comparators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited short-term evidence indicates that SGAD monotherapy in acute BD-II depression is well-tolerated and has similar response rates to lithium, without increasing switch risk. Nevertheless, the evidence base is small and heterogeneous. Larger and longer RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy, characterize maintenance benefits, and inform personalized treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94351,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"55 4","pages":"79-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Individuals with Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) face high rates of depression and have limited FDA-approved treatments, leading to treatment delays and poor functioning. Although not commonly recommended, monoaminergic antidepressants are prescribed to 50% of patients. This review updates the evidence for second-generation antidepressant (SGAD) monotherapy in treating acute BD-II depression.

Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science from March 2021 to February 2025 and included five studies published before 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGAD monotherapy in adults with acute BD-II depression. Primary outcomes were response, remission, treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS), dropouts owing to adverse events (AEs), and overall discontinuations.

Results: Of 949 records identified, 12 studies were selected for full-text assessment, and six were included in our systematic review. The final dataset comprised four double-blind RCTs (n = 533), one open-label RCT (n = 83), and one triple-blind RCT (n = 40). Venlafaxine and sertraline produced short-term benefits, with response rates 60.4%-73.3% and remission rates 44.2%-58.5%. TEAS risk was ⩽ 19.9% and did not differ from lithium in head-to-head comparisons. AEs withdrawals were similar; SGADs often had comparable or better all-cause discontinuation than comparators.

Conclusions: Limited short-term evidence indicates that SGAD monotherapy in acute BD-II depression is well-tolerated and has similar response rates to lithium, without increasing switch risk. Nevertheless, the evidence base is small and heterogeneous. Larger and longer RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy, characterize maintenance benefits, and inform personalized treatment decisions.

第二代抗抑郁单药治疗急性双相ii型抑郁症的系统评价。
目的:双相情感障碍(BD-II)患者面临高抑郁率,fda批准的治疗方法有限,导致治疗延误和功能不良。虽然不常被推荐,但50%的患者都开了单胺类抗抑郁药。本文综述了第二代抗抑郁药(SGAD)单药治疗急性BD-II型抑郁症的最新证据。方法:我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、PsycINFO、Scopus和Web of Science于2021年3月至2025年2月期间发表的5篇研究。随机对照试验(rct)评估SGAD单药治疗成人急性BD-II型抑郁症的疗效。主要结局是反应、缓解、治疗产生的情感转换(TEAS)、因不良事件(ae)而退出治疗和总体停药。结果:在949篇文献中,12篇研究被纳入全文评估,6篇纳入我们的系统综述。最终数据集包括4个双盲RCT (n = 533), 1个开放标签RCT (n = 83)和1个三盲RCT (n = 40)。文拉法辛和舍曲林有短期疗效,缓解率为60.4% ~ 73.3%,缓解率为44.2% ~ 58.5%。在头对头比较中,tea风险为19.9%,与锂没有差异。ae提取相似;与比较药物相比,SGADs的全因停药情况可比较或更好。结论:有限的短期证据表明,SGAD单药治疗急性BD-II抑郁症耐受性良好,反应率与锂盐相似,且不增加转换风险。然而,证据基础是小而异构的。需要更大规模和更长时间的随机对照试验来确认疗效,描述维持益处,并为个性化治疗决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信