Prevalence of THC-Positive Urine Drug Screens in Patients Receiving Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Retrospective Review.

Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2025-07-04
Jamal Hasoon, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye
{"title":"Prevalence of THC-Positive Urine Drug Screens in Patients Receiving Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-positive urine drug screens (UDS) in patients undergoing chronic opioid therapy (COT) for chronic pain at a single academic institution. With a growing national trend toward cannabis legalization and increased public access to marijuana for medical and recreational purposes, understanding the intersection between THC use and opioid prescribing practices is essential. The presence of THC on UDS has clinical, legal, and ethical implications, especially in regions where cannabis remains illegal. This study sought to quantify the prevalence of THC positivity in patients receiving COT for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 244 UDS results were reviewed from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Among these, 24 patients (9.8%) tested positive for THC. Documentation and clinical responses to positive results varied, with some providers documenting patient counseling, while others did not acknowledge the result in the medical record. In a small subset of cases, positive THC findings contributed to changes in opioid therapy, including tapering or discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>THC-positive UDS results are relatively common among patients receiving chronic opioid therapy, highlighting the increasing prevalence of cannabis use in this population. These findings align with prior literature and reinforce the need for individualized, non-punitive approaches to care. Routine screening, consistent documentation, and open communication about cannabis use are essential components of effective opioid risk stratification, safe prescribing practices, and informed treatment planning. These considerations are critical in regions where recreational marijuana remains illegal, which may further influence provider decision-making regarding ongoing opioid therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94351,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"55 4","pages":"36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of study: This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-positive urine drug screens (UDS) in patients undergoing chronic opioid therapy (COT) for chronic pain at a single academic institution. With a growing national trend toward cannabis legalization and increased public access to marijuana for medical and recreational purposes, understanding the intersection between THC use and opioid prescribing practices is essential. The presence of THC on UDS has clinical, legal, and ethical implications, especially in regions where cannabis remains illegal. This study sought to quantify the prevalence of THC positivity in patients receiving COT for chronic pain.

Findings: A total of 244 UDS results were reviewed from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Among these, 24 patients (9.8%) tested positive for THC. Documentation and clinical responses to positive results varied, with some providers documenting patient counseling, while others did not acknowledge the result in the medical record. In a small subset of cases, positive THC findings contributed to changes in opioid therapy, including tapering or discontinuation.

Conclusion: THC-positive UDS results are relatively common among patients receiving chronic opioid therapy, highlighting the increasing prevalence of cannabis use in this population. These findings align with prior literature and reinforce the need for individualized, non-punitive approaches to care. Routine screening, consistent documentation, and open communication about cannabis use are essential components of effective opioid risk stratification, safe prescribing practices, and informed treatment planning. These considerations are critical in regions where recreational marijuana remains illegal, which may further influence provider decision-making regarding ongoing opioid therapy.

接受慢性阿片类药物治疗的患者中thc阳性尿药物筛查的患病率:回顾性回顾。
研究目的:本回顾性研究旨在评估在单一学术机构接受慢性阿片类药物治疗(COT)的慢性疼痛患者中四氢大麻酚(THC)尿药物筛查(UDS)阳性的患病率。随着大麻合法化的全国趋势日益增长,以及公众出于医疗和娱乐目的获得大麻的机会越来越多,了解四氢大麻酚使用与阿片类药物处方做法之间的交集至关重要。UDS上存在四氢大麻酚具有临床、法律和伦理意义,特别是在大麻仍然非法的地区。本研究旨在量化因慢性疼痛而接受COT治疗的患者中THC阳性的患病率。结果:从2024年1月1日至2024年12月31日,共审查了244项UDS结果。其中24例(9.8%)THC检测呈阳性。对阳性结果的记录和临床反应各不相同,一些提供者记录了患者的咨询,而另一些提供者在医疗记录中不承认结果。在一小部分病例中,四氢大麻酚阳性结果导致阿片类药物治疗的改变,包括逐渐减少或停药。结论:UDS中thc阳性结果在接受慢性阿片类药物治疗的患者中相对常见,这表明大麻使用在这一人群中越来越普遍。这些发现与先前的文献一致,并加强了个性化、非惩罚性护理方法的必要性。关于大麻使用的常规筛查、一致的文件记录和公开沟通是有效的阿片类药物风险分层、安全的处方做法和知情的治疗计划的重要组成部分。在娱乐性大麻仍然非法的地区,这些考虑是至关重要的,这可能进一步影响提供者对正在进行的阿片类药物治疗的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信