Comparison of the perioperative efficacy of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and the suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: Spinal positioning, medication usage, and patient satisfaction.

IF 1
Mete Gedikbaş, Ali Genç
{"title":"Comparison of the perioperative efficacy of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and the suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: Spinal positioning, medication usage, and patient satisfaction.","authors":"Mete Gedikbaş, Ali Genç","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.19802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) on perioperative pain control in patients undergoing surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fractures between June 2021 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fractures using a proximal femoral nail under spinal anesthesia, combined with either a PENG block or an S-FICB. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent a PENG block were assigned to Group I, and those who received an S-FICB were assigned to Group II. Functional assessments included perioperative numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, the timing and amount of systemic analgesics use, patient satisfaction, nausea, vomiting, and motor muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spinal positioning score was significantly better in Group I (p<0.01). NRS scores were significantly lower in Group I at the 6th and 12th hours during exercise (p<0.001). Patient satisfaction scores were also significantly higher in Group I (p=0.04). The time to first opioid use was earlier, and the total opioid dose was higher, in Group II (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PENG block, with its more potent analgesic effect, easier positioning, lower opioid consumption, and higher patient satisfaction, emerges as a promising option for hip fracture surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 7","pages":"705-711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.19802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) on perioperative pain control in patients undergoing surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fractures between June 2021 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fractures using a proximal femoral nail under spinal anesthesia, combined with either a PENG block or an S-FICB. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent a PENG block were assigned to Group I, and those who received an S-FICB were assigned to Group II. Functional assessments included perioperative numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, the timing and amount of systemic analgesics use, patient satisfaction, nausea, vomiting, and motor muscle strength.

Results: The spinal positioning score was significantly better in Group I (p<0.01). NRS scores were significantly lower in Group I at the 6th and 12th hours during exercise (p<0.001). Patient satisfaction scores were also significantly higher in Group I (p=0.04). The time to first opioid use was earlier, and the total opioid dose was higher, in Group II (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively).

Conclusion: The PENG block, with its more potent analgesic effect, easier positioning, lower opioid consumption, and higher patient satisfaction, emerges as a promising option for hip fracture surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

髋部骨折围手术期应用囊包膜神经阻滞(PENG)与腹股沟上筋膜髂隔室阻滞(S-FICB)的疗效比较:脊柱定位、药物使用和患者满意度。
背景:本研究旨在比较包膜神经组(PENG)阻滞和腹股沟上筋膜髂隔室阻滞(S-FICB)对股骨粗隆间骨折手术患者围手术期疼痛控制的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年6月至2024年6月间行股骨粗隆间骨折手术的患者。该研究包括在脊髓麻醉下使用股骨近端钉进行股骨粗隆间骨折手术的患者,并联合PENG阻滞或S-FICB。患者被分为两组:接受PENG阻滞的患者被分配到第一组,接受S-FICB的患者被分配到第二组。功能评估包括围手术期数值评定量表(NRS)评分、全身镇痛药使用的时间和数量、患者满意度、恶心、呕吐和运动肌肉力量。结果:第一组脊柱定位评分明显优于第一组(p)。结论:彭阻滞镇痛效果更强,定位更容易,阿片类药物消耗更少,患者满意度更高,是髋部骨折手术的一种有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信