Diversity and similarity of near-death experiences across cultures and history: implications for the survival hypothesis.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
International Review of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1080/09540261.2024.2402429
Gregory Shushan
{"title":"Diversity and similarity of near-death experiences across cultures and history: implications for the survival hypothesis.","authors":"Gregory Shushan","doi":"10.1080/09540261.2024.2402429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While accounts of near-death experiences (NDEs) are found around the world and throughout history, descriptions of the phenomenon vary widely. Whether arguing for or against the survival hypothesis, most scholarly and scientific discussions of NDEs are predicated on seeing them as either a universal human phenomenon or as an entirely culturally-constructed one. This article will discuss the implications for the survival hypothesis of historical and cross-cultural NDEs, in all their diversity and similarity. On the scientific level, it will consider how the apparent universality of NDEs can be been enlisted to support both survival and materialist hypotheses. On the metaphysical level, this chapter will explore what <i>kind</i> of afterlife might be philosophically conceivable if we were to accept NDE narratives as reflecting genuine afterlife experiences-particularly given all their diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51391,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Psychiatry","volume":"37 2","pages":"95-101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2024.2402429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While accounts of near-death experiences (NDEs) are found around the world and throughout history, descriptions of the phenomenon vary widely. Whether arguing for or against the survival hypothesis, most scholarly and scientific discussions of NDEs are predicated on seeing them as either a universal human phenomenon or as an entirely culturally-constructed one. This article will discuss the implications for the survival hypothesis of historical and cross-cultural NDEs, in all their diversity and similarity. On the scientific level, it will consider how the apparent universality of NDEs can be been enlisted to support both survival and materialist hypotheses. On the metaphysical level, this chapter will explore what kind of afterlife might be philosophically conceivable if we were to accept NDE narratives as reflecting genuine afterlife experiences-particularly given all their diversity.

跨文化和历史的濒死体验的多样性和相似性:对生存假说的启示。
虽然世界各地和历史上都有关于濒死体验(NDEs)的记载,但对这种现象的描述却大相径庭。无论是支持还是反对生存假说,大多数关于濒死体验的学术和科学讨论都是基于将其视为一种普遍的人类现象,或者完全是一种文化建构的现象。本文将讨论历史和跨文化濒死体验对生存假说的影响,包括它们的多样性和相似性。在科学层面上,它将考虑如何利用濒死体验的明显普遍性来支持生存和唯物主义假设。在形而上学的层面上,本章将探讨如果我们接受濒死体验的叙述作为真实的来世体验,特别是考虑到它们的多样性,那么什么样的来世可能在哲学上是可以想象的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The International Review of Psychiatry is the premier review journal in the field with a truly international authorship and readership. Each bimonthly issue is dedicated to a specific theme relevant to psychiatry, edited by recognized experts on the topic, who are selected by the Editors and the Editorial Board. Each issue provides in-depth, scholarly reviews of the topic in focus. The Journal reaches a broad international readership including clinicians, academics, educators, and researchers who wish to remain up-to-date with recent and rapid developments in various fields of psychiatry. It aims to be of value to trainees by choosing topics of relevance to career development, which are also suitable for clinicians for continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信