Mental Health Screening in a Rural Trauma Center: Feasibility and Impact.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Trauma Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000864
Tessa C Savell, Alexa L Peterson, Ryan P Carroll, Lanny C Orr, Craig E Palm, Michael S Englehart, Simon J Thompson
{"title":"Mental Health Screening in a Rural Trauma Center: Feasibility and Impact.","authors":"Tessa C Savell, Alexa L Peterson, Ryan P Carroll, Lanny C Orr, Craig E Palm, Michael S Englehart, Simon J Thompson","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma survivors often develop psychological sequelae, namely depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Identifying and treating at-risk patients in rural trauma centers is challenging due to resource limitations, a gap not previously addressed in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative in a rural trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement study used a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative over 2 years (2022-2024) in a rural Northwestern U.S. Level II trauma center. We compared screening compliance, resource provision, and psychiatric consultation rates between the implementation (August 2022-July 2023) and post-implementation years (August 2023-July 2024). The inclusion criteria included trauma patients aged ≥18 years, with a Glasgow Coma Scale > 14, and who were admitted ≥ 2 days. The target screening compliance rate was set at ≥ 80%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,114 eligible patients, 938 (84.2%) were screened, with 314 (33.5%) screening positive for psychological sequelae. All positive screen patients received a resource pamphlet and psychiatric consultation offers, resulting in 34 (10.8%) receiving formal evaluations. Missed screening opportunities decreased from 20.5% (95% CI [16.7, 24.4]) in the implementation year to 13.6% (95% CI [9.0, 18.2]) (p = .022) in the post-implementation year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mental health screening proved feasible in a rural trauma center, achieving 84.2% screening compliance. Despite barriers of limited staff availability and manual documentation, missed screening opportunities decreased. However, with only 10.8% of positively screened patients receiving psychiatric consultations, substantial systemic barriers remain to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":"32 4","pages":"208-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma survivors often develop psychological sequelae, namely depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Identifying and treating at-risk patients in rural trauma centers is challenging due to resource limitations, a gap not previously addressed in the literature.

Objective: To assess the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative in a rural trauma center.

Methods: This quality improvement study used a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative over 2 years (2022-2024) in a rural Northwestern U.S. Level II trauma center. We compared screening compliance, resource provision, and psychiatric consultation rates between the implementation (August 2022-July 2023) and post-implementation years (August 2023-July 2024). The inclusion criteria included trauma patients aged ≥18 years, with a Glasgow Coma Scale > 14, and who were admitted ≥ 2 days. The target screening compliance rate was set at ≥ 80%.

Results: Of the 1,114 eligible patients, 938 (84.2%) were screened, with 314 (33.5%) screening positive for psychological sequelae. All positive screen patients received a resource pamphlet and psychiatric consultation offers, resulting in 34 (10.8%) receiving formal evaluations. Missed screening opportunities decreased from 20.5% (95% CI [16.7, 24.4]) in the implementation year to 13.6% (95% CI [9.0, 18.2]) (p = .022) in the post-implementation year.

Conclusion: Mental health screening proved feasible in a rural trauma center, achieving 84.2% screening compliance. Despite barriers of limited staff availability and manual documentation, missed screening opportunities decreased. However, with only 10.8% of positively screened patients receiving psychiatric consultations, substantial systemic barriers remain to be addressed.

农村创伤中心的心理健康筛查:可行性和影响
背景:创伤幸存者通常会出现心理后遗症,即抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍。由于资源限制,在农村创伤中心识别和治疗高危患者具有挑战性,这是以前文献中没有解决的差距。目的:评价农村创伤中心开展精神健康筛查的可行性及影响。方法:本质量改进研究采用准实验设计,评估在美国西北部农村二级创伤中心开展为期2年(2022-2024)的精神健康筛查活动的可行性和影响。我们比较了实施(2022年8月- 2023年7月)和实施后(2023年8月- 2024年7月)的筛查依从性、资源供应和精神病学咨询率。纳入标准包括年龄≥18岁、格拉斯哥昏迷评分bbb14、住院≥2天的创伤患者。目标筛查依从率设定为≥80%。结果:在1114例符合条件的患者中,938例(84.2%)进行了筛查,其中314例(33.5%)心理后遗症筛查阳性。所有筛查阳性的患者都收到了资料小册子和精神病学咨询建议,其中34例(10.8%)接受了正式评估。未筛查机会从实施年度的20.5% (95% CI[16.7, 24.4])下降到实施后一年的13.6% (95% CI [9.0, 18.2]) (p = 0.022)。结论:心理健康筛查在农村创伤中心是可行的,筛查依从率为84.2%。尽管工作人员的可用性和手工文件有限,但错过的筛查机会减少了。然而,只有10.8%的阳性筛查患者接受精神病学咨询,实质性的系统性障碍仍有待解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.​ The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信