Tessa C Savell, Alexa L Peterson, Ryan P Carroll, Lanny C Orr, Craig E Palm, Michael S Englehart, Simon J Thompson
{"title":"Mental Health Screening in a Rural Trauma Center: Feasibility and Impact.","authors":"Tessa C Savell, Alexa L Peterson, Ryan P Carroll, Lanny C Orr, Craig E Palm, Michael S Englehart, Simon J Thompson","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma survivors often develop psychological sequelae, namely depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Identifying and treating at-risk patients in rural trauma centers is challenging due to resource limitations, a gap not previously addressed in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative in a rural trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement study used a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative over 2 years (2022-2024) in a rural Northwestern U.S. Level II trauma center. We compared screening compliance, resource provision, and psychiatric consultation rates between the implementation (August 2022-July 2023) and post-implementation years (August 2023-July 2024). The inclusion criteria included trauma patients aged ≥18 years, with a Glasgow Coma Scale > 14, and who were admitted ≥ 2 days. The target screening compliance rate was set at ≥ 80%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,114 eligible patients, 938 (84.2%) were screened, with 314 (33.5%) screening positive for psychological sequelae. All positive screen patients received a resource pamphlet and psychiatric consultation offers, resulting in 34 (10.8%) receiving formal evaluations. Missed screening opportunities decreased from 20.5% (95% CI [16.7, 24.4]) in the implementation year to 13.6% (95% CI [9.0, 18.2]) (p = .022) in the post-implementation year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mental health screening proved feasible in a rural trauma center, achieving 84.2% screening compliance. Despite barriers of limited staff availability and manual documentation, missed screening opportunities decreased. However, with only 10.8% of positively screened patients receiving psychiatric consultations, substantial systemic barriers remain to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":"32 4","pages":"208-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Trauma survivors often develop psychological sequelae, namely depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Identifying and treating at-risk patients in rural trauma centers is challenging due to resource limitations, a gap not previously addressed in the literature.
Objective: To assess the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative in a rural trauma center.
Methods: This quality improvement study used a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the feasibility and impact of a mental health screening initiative over 2 years (2022-2024) in a rural Northwestern U.S. Level II trauma center. We compared screening compliance, resource provision, and psychiatric consultation rates between the implementation (August 2022-July 2023) and post-implementation years (August 2023-July 2024). The inclusion criteria included trauma patients aged ≥18 years, with a Glasgow Coma Scale > 14, and who were admitted ≥ 2 days. The target screening compliance rate was set at ≥ 80%.
Results: Of the 1,114 eligible patients, 938 (84.2%) were screened, with 314 (33.5%) screening positive for psychological sequelae. All positive screen patients received a resource pamphlet and psychiatric consultation offers, resulting in 34 (10.8%) receiving formal evaluations. Missed screening opportunities decreased from 20.5% (95% CI [16.7, 24.4]) in the implementation year to 13.6% (95% CI [9.0, 18.2]) (p = .022) in the post-implementation year.
Conclusion: Mental health screening proved feasible in a rural trauma center, achieving 84.2% screening compliance. Despite barriers of limited staff availability and manual documentation, missed screening opportunities decreased. However, with only 10.8% of positively screened patients receiving psychiatric consultations, substantial systemic barriers remain to be addressed.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses.
The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.
The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.