Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Dental Students on Pulp Sensitivity Tests and Diagnostic Tools.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Camila Leão de Azevedo Pereira, Lucas Alves Jural, Manuella Freire Marzullo, Eveline Salomão Portella Mariano Lima, Marcela Barauna Magno, Patrícia A Risso
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Dental Students on Pulp Sensitivity Tests and Diagnostic Tools.","authors":"Camila Leão de Azevedo Pereira, Lucas Alves Jural, Manuella Freire Marzullo, Eveline Salomão Portella Mariano Lima, Marcela Barauna Magno, Patrícia A Risso","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the knowledge of Brazilian dental students about pulp sensitivity tests (PSTs), their attitudes concerning their aptitude for performing different diagnostic tools (DTs), and how frequently these DTs are practiced in clinical scenarios involving asymptomatic teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2024, an online questionnaire with 23 questions was developed and administered, divided into four sections: (1) sample characterization, as well as the frequency of endodontic emergency care and the participant's self-assessment of their knowledge about PSTs; (2) knowledge of PSTs (cold, heat, and electric)-K-PST; (3) Attitudes; (4) Practices. The mean number of correct answers for K-PST was used to assess the knowledge level. Differences in the K-PST mean scores between demographic and academic variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 628 students, 51.3% considered themselves to have good knowledge of PSTs. However, the mean number of correct answers in K-PST was 3.43 ± 1.72. The DTs with which students felt most confident were radiography, mobility testing, and cold pulp test, respectively. No significant differences in PST knowledge were found with respect to the variables analyzed. In the clinical scenarios presented, radiographs and the collection of pain history were the most frequently reported practices, whereas PSTs were less commonly utilized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although students demonstrated self-confidence regarding their PST knowledge, the mean number of correct answers indicates a low level of knowledge. Moreover, the use of these tests does not appear to be a common practice among students.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":"e13988"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the knowledge of Brazilian dental students about pulp sensitivity tests (PSTs), their attitudes concerning their aptitude for performing different diagnostic tools (DTs), and how frequently these DTs are practiced in clinical scenarios involving asymptomatic teeth.

Methods: In 2024, an online questionnaire with 23 questions was developed and administered, divided into four sections: (1) sample characterization, as well as the frequency of endodontic emergency care and the participant's self-assessment of their knowledge about PSTs; (2) knowledge of PSTs (cold, heat, and electric)-K-PST; (3) Attitudes; (4) Practices. The mean number of correct answers for K-PST was used to assess the knowledge level. Differences in the K-PST mean scores between demographic and academic variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p < 0.05).

Results: Among the 628 students, 51.3% considered themselves to have good knowledge of PSTs. However, the mean number of correct answers in K-PST was 3.43 ± 1.72. The DTs with which students felt most confident were radiography, mobility testing, and cold pulp test, respectively. No significant differences in PST knowledge were found with respect to the variables analyzed. In the clinical scenarios presented, radiographs and the collection of pain history were the most frequently reported practices, whereas PSTs were less commonly utilized.

Conclusion: Although students demonstrated self-confidence regarding their PST knowledge, the mean number of correct answers indicates a low level of knowledge. Moreover, the use of these tests does not appear to be a common practice among students.

牙科学生对牙髓敏感性测试和诊断工具的知识、态度和实践。
目的:调查巴西牙科学生对牙髓敏感性测试(PSTs)的知识,他们对执行不同诊断工具(DTs)的能力的态度,以及这些DTs在临床情况下涉及无症状牙齿的频率。方法:于2024年制定并实施了一份共23个问题的在线问卷,分为4个部分:(1)样本特征、牙髓急诊护理频次及参与者对PSTs知识的自我评估;(2)了解pst(冷、热、电)-K-PST;(3)态度;(4)实践。K-PST的平均正确答案数被用来评估知识水平。采用Mann-Whitney检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验分析人口学变量和学术变量之间K-PST平均得分的差异(p < 0.05)。结果:628名学生中,51.3%的学生认为自己对PSTs有较好的了解。K-PST的平均正确率为3.43±1.72。学生认为最有信心的dt分别是x线摄影、活动能力测试和冷牙髓测试。就所分析的变量而言,PST知识没有显著差异。在临床场景中,x线片和疼痛史的收集是最常报道的做法,而pst较少使用。结论:虽然学生对自己的PST知识表现出自信,但平均正确答案的数量表明他们的知识水平较低。此外,使用这些测试在学生中似乎并不常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信