Assessment of Quadriceps Muscle Characteristics in Female Division I Athletes: A Validation Study of Wireless Probes Against Standard Ultrasound Units.
Jessica E Tolzman, Corey D Grozier, Arjun Parmar, Katherine Collins, Christopher Kuenze, Brad Winn, Matthew S Harkey
{"title":"Assessment of Quadriceps Muscle Characteristics in Female Division I Athletes: A Validation Study of Wireless Probes Against Standard Ultrasound Units.","authors":"Jessica E Tolzman, Corey D Grozier, Arjun Parmar, Katherine Collins, Christopher Kuenze, Brad Winn, Matthew S Harkey","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Wireless ultrasound probes offer a quicker, more affordable option for muscle quality assessment compared with standard cart units, yet their effectiveness for evaluating larger muscles such as the rectus femoris in terms of cross-sectional area (CSA) and echo-intensity (EI) is unclear due to limited field of view. This study evaluates whether rectus femoris thickness and EI measured with a wireless probe correlate with CSA and EI obtained from a standard cart ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, convenience sample of 29 division I college female athletes (age: 20.1 [1.1] y, height: 169.7 [7.4] cm, mass: 69.7 [10.0] kg) were recruited. Panoramic thigh ultrasound images were acquired with a standard ultrasound cart to assess the rectus femoris CSA and EI at 50% of the thigh length. A wireless ultrasound probe was used to acquire stationary images with the knee in the same position to assess rectus femoris thickness and EI. A Pearson product-moment correlation was used to determine the association between the muscle outcomes obtained with the standard cart ultrasound and wireless ultrasound probe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standard ultrasound CSA (10.1 [2.0] cm2) and wireless ultrasound thickness (2.0 [0.3] cm) were strongly associated (r = .71, P < .001). Standard ultrasound EI (56.2 [5.1] arbitrary units) and wireless ultrasound EI (62.0 [6.3] arbitrary units) were moderately associated (r = .49, P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wireless ultrasound offers a fast and accessible method for assessing muscle thickness in female division I athletes when compared with similar muscle size and quality metrics measured on panoramic images acquired with a standard ultrasound cart. The echogenicity indices from wireless and standard ultrasound are significantly associated between units; however, wireless ultrasound systematically overestimates echogenicity compared with the standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Wireless ultrasound probes offer a quicker, more affordable option for muscle quality assessment compared with standard cart units, yet their effectiveness for evaluating larger muscles such as the rectus femoris in terms of cross-sectional area (CSA) and echo-intensity (EI) is unclear due to limited field of view. This study evaluates whether rectus femoris thickness and EI measured with a wireless probe correlate with CSA and EI obtained from a standard cart ultrasound.
Methods: A cross-sectional, convenience sample of 29 division I college female athletes (age: 20.1 [1.1] y, height: 169.7 [7.4] cm, mass: 69.7 [10.0] kg) were recruited. Panoramic thigh ultrasound images were acquired with a standard ultrasound cart to assess the rectus femoris CSA and EI at 50% of the thigh length. A wireless ultrasound probe was used to acquire stationary images with the knee in the same position to assess rectus femoris thickness and EI. A Pearson product-moment correlation was used to determine the association between the muscle outcomes obtained with the standard cart ultrasound and wireless ultrasound probe.
Results: Standard ultrasound CSA (10.1 [2.0] cm2) and wireless ultrasound thickness (2.0 [0.3] cm) were strongly associated (r = .71, P < .001). Standard ultrasound EI (56.2 [5.1] arbitrary units) and wireless ultrasound EI (62.0 [6.3] arbitrary units) were moderately associated (r = .49, P = .007).
Conclusion: Wireless ultrasound offers a fast and accessible method for assessing muscle thickness in female division I athletes when compared with similar muscle size and quality metrics measured on panoramic images acquired with a standard ultrasound cart. The echogenicity indices from wireless and standard ultrasound are significantly associated between units; however, wireless ultrasound systematically overestimates echogenicity compared with the standard.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant.
JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.