Evaluating technology services: perspectives of parents and teachers of individuals with disabilities through an importance-performance analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Weimin Wu, Jianhong Zheng
{"title":"Evaluating technology services: perspectives of parents and teachers of individuals with disabilities through an importance-performance analysis.","authors":"Weimin Wu, Jianhong Zheng","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2530669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Parents and teachers of individuals with disabilities have a critical role in the effectiveness of students' assistive technology (AT) services. However, research on their perceptions of AT and satisfaction with it is limited. The current study fills this gap by exploring the importance and performance of AT services as perceived by parents and teachers of individuals with disabilities, also examining the differences between their perceptions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants in this study included parents and teachers of children with disabilities. The data were collected using a quantitative research method and a questionnaire administered to 196 teachers and 204 parents. Descriptive statistics and importance of performance analysis were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Among parents, the perceived performance of AT services generally exceeded their perceived importance on the overall scale, except for the \"application procedures\" dimension, where perceived importance outweighed perceived performance. The opposite trend was observed for teachers: perceived importance surpassed perceived performance on the overall scale, except for the \"application procedures\" dimension, where perceived performance exceeded perceived importance. (2) Both parents and teachers considered the \"application procedures\" dimension important. However, their satisfaction levels differed: Parents found this dimension unsatisfactory. Teachers, in contrast, found it satisfactory. (3) Five specific service items were identified as requiring prioritisation for improvement: \"total hours of service received,\" \"scheduled time slots,\" \"designated locations,\" \"AT device applicability,\" and \"transition program services.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The paper presents suggestions for enhancing AT services based on these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2530669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Parents and teachers of individuals with disabilities have a critical role in the effectiveness of students' assistive technology (AT) services. However, research on their perceptions of AT and satisfaction with it is limited. The current study fills this gap by exploring the importance and performance of AT services as perceived by parents and teachers of individuals with disabilities, also examining the differences between their perceptions.

Materials and methods: Participants in this study included parents and teachers of children with disabilities. The data were collected using a quantitative research method and a questionnaire administered to 196 teachers and 204 parents. Descriptive statistics and importance of performance analysis were used to analyse the data.

Results: (1) Among parents, the perceived performance of AT services generally exceeded their perceived importance on the overall scale, except for the "application procedures" dimension, where perceived importance outweighed perceived performance. The opposite trend was observed for teachers: perceived importance surpassed perceived performance on the overall scale, except for the "application procedures" dimension, where perceived performance exceeded perceived importance. (2) Both parents and teachers considered the "application procedures" dimension important. However, their satisfaction levels differed: Parents found this dimension unsatisfactory. Teachers, in contrast, found it satisfactory. (3) Five specific service items were identified as requiring prioritisation for improvement: "total hours of service received," "scheduled time slots," "designated locations," "AT device applicability," and "transition program services."

Conclusion: The paper presents suggestions for enhancing AT services based on these findings.

评估技术服务:通过重要性-绩效分析的残疾个体的家长和教师的观点。
目的:残疾学生的家长和教师在学生辅助技术(AT)服务的有效性中起着至关重要的作用。然而,对他们的认知和满意度的研究是有限的。目前的研究填补了这一空白,探讨了残疾人士家长和老师对辅助教学服务的重要性和表现的看法,并检查了他们看法之间的差异。材料与方法:研究对象为残疾儿童的家长和教师。采用定量研究方法,对196名教师和204名家长进行问卷调查。采用描述性统计和绩效重要性分析法对数据进行分析。结果:(1)除“申请程序”维度的重要性大于服务绩效外,家长对服务绩效的感知总体高于服务重要性。在教师中观察到相反的趋势:在整体量表上,感知重要性超过感知绩效,除了“申请程序”维度,感知绩效超过感知重要性。(2)家长和老师都认为“申请程序”维度很重要。然而,他们的满意度有所不同:父母对这个维度不满意。相比之下,教师们则感到满意。(3)五个特定的服务项目被确定为需要优先改进的:“接收的总服务时间”、“预定时间段”、“指定地点”、“AT设备适用性”和“过渡计划服务”。结论:在此基础上,提出了加强交通运输服务的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信