Cara L Barnett, Prashant Malhotra, Allyson VanHorn, Boriana Zaharieva, John Myers, William J Riggs, Elizabeth Jordan
{"title":"Utilization of genetics services in the diagnosis of hearing loss in newborns in the state of Ohio.","authors":"Cara L Barnett, Prashant Malhotra, Allyson VanHorn, Boriana Zaharieva, John Myers, William J Riggs, Elizabeth Jordan","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00816-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 50-60% of confirmed congenital hearing loss (HL) diagnoses, the etiology is genetic. The importance of a genetic evaluation for HL is recognized by several national organizations in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, beliefs, and knowledge of the role of genetics in the medical diagnosis of HL and assess parent experience and knowledge regarding the role of genetics in the diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were designed using published guidance on optimal care of newborns with HL. Participants included providers (otolaryngologists (ENT) and audiologists) and parents of a newborn with confirmed HL in the state of Ohio from 2017 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 providers (14 ENT; 81 audiologist) and 39 parent responses were included in the analysis. Only 51% of providers refer for a genetics evaluation (n = 49), and less than 10% order genetic testing (n = 9). However, 96% of providers believe families should be presented with the opportunity to pursue a genetics evaluation. In this study, only 46% (n = 18) of parents reported that they were referred to genetics, and 36% (n = 14) reported that their child had genetic testing for HL. For parentss whose child did not have a genetic evaluation, 53% (n = 17/32) were very likely or likely, 25% (n = 8/32) were unsure, and 22% (n = 7/32) were very unlikely or unlikely to pursue an evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is inconsistent implementation of guideline directed care for genetic services for HL. As opportunities for gene therapies for HL advance, there is a need to expand access to genetic evaluation for HL.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"603-613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00816-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In 50-60% of confirmed congenital hearing loss (HL) diagnoses, the etiology is genetic. The importance of a genetic evaluation for HL is recognized by several national organizations in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, beliefs, and knowledge of the role of genetics in the medical diagnosis of HL and assess parent experience and knowledge regarding the role of genetics in the diagnostic process.
Methods: Two surveys were designed using published guidance on optimal care of newborns with HL. Participants included providers (otolaryngologists (ENT) and audiologists) and parents of a newborn with confirmed HL in the state of Ohio from 2017 to 2018.
Results: 95 providers (14 ENT; 81 audiologist) and 39 parent responses were included in the analysis. Only 51% of providers refer for a genetics evaluation (n = 49), and less than 10% order genetic testing (n = 9). However, 96% of providers believe families should be presented with the opportunity to pursue a genetics evaluation. In this study, only 46% (n = 18) of parents reported that they were referred to genetics, and 36% (n = 14) reported that their child had genetic testing for HL. For parentss whose child did not have a genetic evaluation, 53% (n = 17/32) were very likely or likely, 25% (n = 8/32) were unsure, and 22% (n = 7/32) were very unlikely or unlikely to pursue an evaluation.
Conclusion: There is inconsistent implementation of guideline directed care for genetic services for HL. As opportunities for gene therapies for HL advance, there is a need to expand access to genetic evaluation for HL.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals.
Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues.
The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.
The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.