{"title":"Effect of different surgical approaches for intrauterine adhesions patients on pregnancy outcomes.","authors":"Ping Guo, Meiqin Chen, Shan Liu, Wei Peng, Xingping Zhao, Hualian Chen","doi":"10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2025.240529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA) under hysteroscopy is the mainstay treatment for intrauterine adhesions (IUA), but its effectiveness varies depending on the surgical approach. This study aims to investigate the impact of different surgical techniques on endometrial repair and pregnancy outcomes in patients with secondary infertility and moderate-to-severe IUA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 225 patients who underwent TCRA followed by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer between January 2021 and December 2022. Patients were grouped based on the surgical method: A cold knife group (<i>n</i>=127) and an electrosurgical group (<i>n</i>=98). Adhesions were separated using either cold knife or electrosurgical instruments. Postoperative visualization of uterine angle and tubal ostia, endometrial restoration, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in adhesion tissues, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors influencing pregnancy outcomes. A LightGBM model was constructed to predict pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the electrosurgical group, patients in the cold knife group had significantly greater postoperative endometrial thickness [(8.86±0.53) mm vs (8.10±0.87) mm, <i>P</i><0.05], higher live birth rates (64.57% vs 30.61%, <i>P</i><0.05), and lower VEGF expression (1.31±0.09 vs 1.53±0.16, <i>P</i><0.05). Logistic regression analyses identified age, number of visible tubal ostia postoperatively, and surgical method as significant factors affecting pregnancy outcomes (<i>P</i><0.05). The LightGBM model based on surgical method had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.882 (0.838-0.926), with internal validation AUC of 0.817 (0.790-0.840).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cold knife surgery promotes faster recovery of the endometrial microenvironment and earlier improvement of fertility in patients with secondary infertility and IUA Surgical method is a key factor influencing pregnancy outcomes, and the LightGBM model based on surgical approach shows good predictive performance for pregnancy outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe IUA.</p>","PeriodicalId":39801,"journal":{"name":"中南大学学报(医学版)","volume":"50 3","pages":"482-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中南大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2025.240529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA) under hysteroscopy is the mainstay treatment for intrauterine adhesions (IUA), but its effectiveness varies depending on the surgical approach. This study aims to investigate the impact of different surgical techniques on endometrial repair and pregnancy outcomes in patients with secondary infertility and moderate-to-severe IUA.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 225 patients who underwent TCRA followed by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer between January 2021 and December 2022. Patients were grouped based on the surgical method: A cold knife group (n=127) and an electrosurgical group (n=98). Adhesions were separated using either cold knife or electrosurgical instruments. Postoperative visualization of uterine angle and tubal ostia, endometrial restoration, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in adhesion tissues, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors influencing pregnancy outcomes. A LightGBM model was constructed to predict pregnancy outcomes.
Results: Compared with the electrosurgical group, patients in the cold knife group had significantly greater postoperative endometrial thickness [(8.86±0.53) mm vs (8.10±0.87) mm, P<0.05], higher live birth rates (64.57% vs 30.61%, P<0.05), and lower VEGF expression (1.31±0.09 vs 1.53±0.16, P<0.05). Logistic regression analyses identified age, number of visible tubal ostia postoperatively, and surgical method as significant factors affecting pregnancy outcomes (P<0.05). The LightGBM model based on surgical method had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.882 (0.838-0.926), with internal validation AUC of 0.817 (0.790-0.840).
Conclusions: Cold knife surgery promotes faster recovery of the endometrial microenvironment and earlier improvement of fertility in patients with secondary infertility and IUA Surgical method is a key factor influencing pregnancy outcomes, and the LightGBM model based on surgical approach shows good predictive performance for pregnancy outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe IUA.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Central South University (Medical Sciences), founded in 1958, is a comprehensive academic journal of medicine and health sponsored by the Ministry of Education and Central South University. The journal has been included in many important databases and authoritative abstract journals at home and abroad, such as the American Medline, Pubmed and its Index Medicus (IM), the Netherlands Medical Abstracts (EM), the American Chemical Abstracts (CA), the WHO Western Pacific Region Medical Index (WPRIM), and the Chinese Science Citation Database (Core Database) (CSCD); it is a statistical source journal of Chinese scientific and technological papers, a Chinese core journal, and a "double-effect" journal of the Chinese Journal Matrix; it is the "2nd, 3rd, and 4th China University Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "2008 China Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "RCCSE China Authoritative Academic Journal (A+)" and Hunan Province's "Top Ten Science and Technology Journals". The purpose of the journal is to reflect the new achievements, new technologies, and new experiences in medical research, medical treatment, and teaching, report new medical trends at home and abroad, promote academic exchanges, improve academic standards, and promote scientific and technological progress.