Reliability and validity of the European Portuguese version of the ABILHAND questionnaire in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
ARP Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-04-01
Fernando Albuquerque, Marcelo Neto, Rodrigo Patrício, Margarida Vieira, Rúben Fernandes, Anabela Silva, Tânia Santiago, Maria João Salvador
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the European Portuguese version of the ABILHAND questionnaire in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis.","authors":"Fernando Albuquerque, Marcelo Neto, Rodrigo Patrício, Margarida Vieira, Rúben Fernandes, Anabela Silva, Tânia Santiago, Maria João Salvador","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) frequently affects hands, impairing its function and impacting quality of life. The ABILHAND-SSc is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically designed to assess manual ability in SSc. Previously, an European Portuguese version has been translated and culturally adapted, but its psychometric properties remain to be validated. Therefore, we aim to validate the European Portuguese version of the ABILHAND-SSc in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) using Rasch analysis and classical test theory. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted in a tertiary rheumatology centre, including 53 Portuguese-speaking adults fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc or VEDOSS classification criteria. Patients completed the ABILHAND-SSc along with other PROMs: HAQ-DI, SHAQ, SF-36v2, EQ-5D-5L, and ScleroID. Rasch analysis assessed item fit, dimensionality, targeting, and reliability. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a stable subsample. Construct validity was examined via hypothesis testing and correlation with external instruments. The ABILHAND-SSc showed excellent internal consistency and Rasch-based reliability. Item fit statistics were within acceptable ranges, and no floor or ceiling effects were observed. Rasch and PCA analyses supported unidimensionality. Test-retest reliability was good. ABILHAND-SSc scores showed good correlation with related PROMs. Patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc had significantly lower manual ability than those with VEDOSS. In conclusion, the European Portuguese version of the ABILHAND-SSc is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool for assessing manual ability in patients with SSc. Its use in clinical practice and research may support patient-centred assessment and monitoring of hand function. Further validation in longitudinal and multicentre studies is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":29669,"journal":{"name":"ARP Rheumatology","volume":"4 2","pages":"123-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARP Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) frequently affects hands, impairing its function and impacting quality of life. The ABILHAND-SSc is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically designed to assess manual ability in SSc. Previously, an European Portuguese version has been translated and culturally adapted, but its psychometric properties remain to be validated. Therefore, we aim to validate the European Portuguese version of the ABILHAND-SSc in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) using Rasch analysis and classical test theory. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted in a tertiary rheumatology centre, including 53 Portuguese-speaking adults fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc or VEDOSS classification criteria. Patients completed the ABILHAND-SSc along with other PROMs: HAQ-DI, SHAQ, SF-36v2, EQ-5D-5L, and ScleroID. Rasch analysis assessed item fit, dimensionality, targeting, and reliability. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a stable subsample. Construct validity was examined via hypothesis testing and correlation with external instruments. The ABILHAND-SSc showed excellent internal consistency and Rasch-based reliability. Item fit statistics were within acceptable ranges, and no floor or ceiling effects were observed. Rasch and PCA analyses supported unidimensionality. Test-retest reliability was good. ABILHAND-SSc scores showed good correlation with related PROMs. Patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc had significantly lower manual ability than those with VEDOSS. In conclusion, the European Portuguese version of the ABILHAND-SSc is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool for assessing manual ability in patients with SSc. Its use in clinical practice and research may support patient-centred assessment and monitoring of hand function. Further validation in longitudinal and multicentre studies is warranted.

系统性硬化症患者ABILHAND问卷的欧洲葡萄牙语版本的信度和效度。
系统性硬化症(SSc)经常影响手,损害其功能并影响生活质量。ABILHAND-SSc是一种患者报告的结果测量(PROM),专门用于评估SSc患者的手动能力。此前,欧洲葡萄牙语版本已被翻译并进行了文化改编,但其心理测量特性仍有待验证。因此,我们的目标是使用Rasch分析和经典测试理论在系统性硬化症(SSc)患者中验证欧洲葡萄牙语版本的ABILHAND-SSc。在三级风湿病中心进行了一项横断面验证研究,包括53名葡语成年人,符合ACR/EULAR 2013分类标准的SSc或VEDOSS分类标准。患者完成了ABILHAND-SSc以及其他prom: HAQ-DI, SHAQ, SF-36v2, EQ-5D-5L和ScleroID。Rasch分析评估了项目契合度、维度、目标和信度。在稳定的子样本中评估重测信度。通过假设检验和与外部工具的相关性来检验结构效度。ABILHAND-SSc具有良好的内部一致性和基于rasch的信度。项目拟合统计在可接受范围内,没有观察到地板或天花板效应。Rasch和PCA分析支持单维性。重测信度良好。ABILHAND-SSc得分与相关prom有良好的相关性。弥漫性皮肤SSc患者的手动能力明显低于VEDOSS患者。总之,欧洲葡萄牙语版本的ABILHAND-SSc是评估SSc患者手工能力的有效、可靠和可行的工具。它在临床实践和研究中的应用可以支持以患者为中心的手功能评估和监测。需要在纵向和多中心研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信