{"title":"Validating HER2 copy number variation assessment by NGS: A comparative analysis with immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.","authors":"Daniele Lorenzini, Rebecca Salvatori, Chiara Costanza Volpi, Desirè Viola Trupia, Monica Niger, Federico Nichetti, Matteo Duca, Silvia Damian, Adele Busico, Alessia Bertolotti, Katia Todoerti, Luca Agnelli, Andrea Vingiani, Giancarlo Pruneri","doi":"10.1177/03008916251345409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-HER2 drugs are becoming an important therapeutic option for various solid tumors, increasing the need for HER2 status testing. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) panels, including FoundationOne®CDx, are commonly used to assess <i>ERBB2</i> (encoding for HER2) copy number alterations. We aimed to evaluate the analytical validity of FoundationOne®CDx assay, by comparing <i>ERBB2</i> copy number data with traditional HER2 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC)/in situ hybridization (ISH) assays in a heterogeneous cohort of solid tumor samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the 531 cases evaluated by FoundationOne®CDx in our Institution, and HER2 status by IHC/ISH could be internally analyzed in 68 cases, including 31 (45.5%) gastroesophageal, 17 (25.0%) colorectal, four (5.8%) breast and two (2.9%) cholangiocarcinoma patients.Tumors with estimated <i>ERBB2</i> copy number ⩾ 4 by FoundationOne®CDx, and tumors with strong and complete (3+) membranous staining by IHC and/or a HER2/CEP17 ratio ⩾2 by ISH were considered NGS positive and IHC/ISH positive, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 21 NGS positive cases (30.9%); IHC/ISH analysis confirming overexpression/amplification in 16 cases (sensitivity: 76.2%), while among the 47 NGS negative cases, 45 were confirmed by IHC/ISH results (specificity: 90%), with a positive predictive value of 76.2% and a negative predictive value of 95.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FoundationOne®CDx provides an accurate evaluation of <i>ERBB2</i> copy number status and may represent a cost-effective option in metastatic cancer patients for whom NGS testing is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"3008916251345409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916251345409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Anti-HER2 drugs are becoming an important therapeutic option for various solid tumors, increasing the need for HER2 status testing. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) panels, including FoundationOne®CDx, are commonly used to assess ERBB2 (encoding for HER2) copy number alterations. We aimed to evaluate the analytical validity of FoundationOne®CDx assay, by comparing ERBB2 copy number data with traditional HER2 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC)/in situ hybridization (ISH) assays in a heterogeneous cohort of solid tumor samples.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the 531 cases evaluated by FoundationOne®CDx in our Institution, and HER2 status by IHC/ISH could be internally analyzed in 68 cases, including 31 (45.5%) gastroesophageal, 17 (25.0%) colorectal, four (5.8%) breast and two (2.9%) cholangiocarcinoma patients.Tumors with estimated ERBB2 copy number ⩾ 4 by FoundationOne®CDx, and tumors with strong and complete (3+) membranous staining by IHC and/or a HER2/CEP17 ratio ⩾2 by ISH were considered NGS positive and IHC/ISH positive, respectively.
Results: We identified 21 NGS positive cases (30.9%); IHC/ISH analysis confirming overexpression/amplification in 16 cases (sensitivity: 76.2%), while among the 47 NGS negative cases, 45 were confirmed by IHC/ISH results (specificity: 90%), with a positive predictive value of 76.2% and a negative predictive value of 95.7%.
Conclusions: FoundationOne®CDx provides an accurate evaluation of ERBB2 copy number status and may represent a cost-effective option in metastatic cancer patients for whom NGS testing is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.