Feasibility Study of Triple-low CCTA for Coronary Artery Disease Screening Combining Contrast Enhancement Boost and Deep Learning Reconstruction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM31334
Zhihua Wu, Min Chen, Yingwen Wei, Chen Shen, Wen Han, Rulin Xu, Zhenyuan Zhou, Jiexiong Xu
{"title":"Feasibility Study of Triple-low CCTA for Coronary Artery Disease Screening Combining Contrast Enhancement Boost and Deep Learning Reconstruction.","authors":"Zhihua Wu, Min Chen, Yingwen Wei, Chen Shen, Wen Han, Rulin Xu, Zhenyuan Zhou, Jiexiong Xu","doi":"10.31083/RCM31334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images obtained using contrast enhancement boost (CE-boost) technology combined with deep learning reconstruction technology at a low dose and low contrast agent flow rate/dosage with traditional CCTA images, while exploring the potential application of this technology in early screening of coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2024 to September 2024, 60 patients suspected of having coronary artery stenosis were enrolled in this study. Ultimately, 46 patients were included for analysis. Based on different acquisition protocols, divided into Group A and Group B. Group A underwent conventional computed tomography (CT) angiography with a tube voltage of 120 kV, a contrast agent injection rate of 6 mL/s, and a dosage of 0.9 mL/kg. Group B received a triple-low CCTA protocol with a tube voltage of 100 kV, a contrast agent injection rate of 2 mL/s, and a dosage of 0.3 mL/kg. Additionally, Group C was created by applying CE-Boost combined with a deep learning reconstruction technique to Group B images. The radiation dose and contrast agent dosage were compared between Group A and Group B. The image quality of the three groups, including CT values, background noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast signal-to-noise ratio (CNR), was also compared, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 indicating significant statistical differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results indicate that Group A required 67.8% more contrast agent and a 52.0% higher radiation dose than Group B (64.68 ± 3.30 mL vs. 20.19 ± 2.22 mL, 6.21 (4.60, 7.78) mSv vs. 2.05 (1.42, 4.33) mSv, all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Image analysis revealed superior subjective scores in Groups A (4.68 ± 0.72) and C (4.38 ± 0.95) versus Group B (4.25 ± 0.10) (both <i>p</i> < 0.05), with no statistical difference between Groups A and C. CT values were significantly elevated in Group A across all vessels compared to both Groups B and C (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while Group C exceeded Group B post CE-Boost. SNR comparisons showed Group A dominance over B in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA-1)/left main coronary artery (LM)/left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)/left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) and over C in the RCA-1/LM (<i>p</i> < 0.05), contrasting with the superiority of SNR in Group C versus B in the middle right coronary artery/distal right coronary artery (RCA-2/3)/LM/LAD/LCX. CNR analysis demonstrated an equivalent performance between A and C, though both groups significantly surpassed Group B (A vs. B: <i>p</i> < 0.05; C vs. B: <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The triple-low CCTA protocol using CE-Boost technology combined with deep learning reconstruction, achieved a 52% reduction in radiation exposure and a 67.8% reduction in contrast agent usage, while preserving diagnostic image quality (with CNR and noise levels comparable to standard protocols). This demonstrates its clinical feasibility for repeated coronary evaluations without compromising diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"31334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM31334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images obtained using contrast enhancement boost (CE-boost) technology combined with deep learning reconstruction technology at a low dose and low contrast agent flow rate/dosage with traditional CCTA images, while exploring the potential application of this technology in early screening of coronary artery disease.

Methods: From March 2024 to September 2024, 60 patients suspected of having coronary artery stenosis were enrolled in this study. Ultimately, 46 patients were included for analysis. Based on different acquisition protocols, divided into Group A and Group B. Group A underwent conventional computed tomography (CT) angiography with a tube voltage of 120 kV, a contrast agent injection rate of 6 mL/s, and a dosage of 0.9 mL/kg. Group B received a triple-low CCTA protocol with a tube voltage of 100 kV, a contrast agent injection rate of 2 mL/s, and a dosage of 0.3 mL/kg. Additionally, Group C was created by applying CE-Boost combined with a deep learning reconstruction technique to Group B images. The radiation dose and contrast agent dosage were compared between Group A and Group B. The image quality of the three groups, including CT values, background noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast signal-to-noise ratio (CNR), was also compared, with p < 0.05 indicating significant statistical differences.

Results: Our results indicate that Group A required 67.8% more contrast agent and a 52.0% higher radiation dose than Group B (64.68 ± 3.30 mL vs. 20.19 ± 2.22 mL, 6.21 (4.60, 7.78) mSv vs. 2.05 (1.42, 4.33) mSv, all p < 0.05). Image analysis revealed superior subjective scores in Groups A (4.68 ± 0.72) and C (4.38 ± 0.95) versus Group B (4.25 ± 0.10) (both p < 0.05), with no statistical difference between Groups A and C. CT values were significantly elevated in Group A across all vessels compared to both Groups B and C (p < 0.05), while Group C exceeded Group B post CE-Boost. SNR comparisons showed Group A dominance over B in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA-1)/left main coronary artery (LM)/left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)/left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) and over C in the RCA-1/LM (p < 0.05), contrasting with the superiority of SNR in Group C versus B in the middle right coronary artery/distal right coronary artery (RCA-2/3)/LM/LAD/LCX. CNR analysis demonstrated an equivalent performance between A and C, though both groups significantly surpassed Group B (A vs. B: p < 0.05; C vs. B: p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The triple-low CCTA protocol using CE-Boost technology combined with deep learning reconstruction, achieved a 52% reduction in radiation exposure and a 67.8% reduction in contrast agent usage, while preserving diagnostic image quality (with CNR and noise levels comparable to standard protocols). This demonstrates its clinical feasibility for repeated coronary evaluations without compromising diagnostic accuracy.

对比增强增强与深度学习重建相结合的三低CCTA筛查冠状动脉疾病的可行性研究。
背景:本研究的目的是比较对比增强增强(CE-boost)技术结合深度学习重建技术在低剂量、低造影剂流速/剂量下获得的冠状动脉计算机断层造影(CCTA)图像与传统CCTA图像的图像质量,同时探讨该技术在冠状动脉疾病早期筛查中的潜在应用。方法:于2024年3月至2024年9月选取60例疑似冠状动脉狭窄的患者作为研究对象。最终纳入46例患者进行分析。根据采集方式的不同,分为A组和b组。A组采用常规CT血管造影,管内电压120 kV,注射造影剂速度6 mL/s,剂量0.9 mL/kg。B组采用三低CCTA方案,管内电压100 kV,注射造影剂速度2 mL/s,剂量0.3 mL/kg。此外,将CE-Boost结合深度学习重建技术对B组图像进行重建,创建C组。比较A组和b组的辐射剂量和造影剂剂量。比较三组CT值、背景噪声、信噪比(SNR)、对比信噪比(CNR)的图像质量,p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:A组所需造影剂比B组多67.8%,辐射剂量比B组高52.0%(64.68±3.30 mL vs. 20.19±2.22 mL, 6.21 (4.60, 7.78) mSv vs. 2.05 (1.42, 4.33) mSv, p < 0.05)。图像分析显示,A组主观评分(4.68±0.72)和C组主观评分(4.38±0.95)优于B组(4.25±0.10)(p均< 0.05),A组与C组之间无统计学差异(p < 0.05), A组各血管CT值均显著高于B组和C组(p < 0.05),而C组在CE-Boost后高于B组。信噪比比较显示,A组右冠状动脉近端(RCA-1)/左主干(LM)/左前降支(LAD)/左旋冠状动脉(LCX)优于B组,RCA-1/LM信噪比高于C组(p < 0.05),而C组右冠状动脉中/右冠状动脉远端(RCA-2/3)/LM/LAD/LCX信噪比优于B组。CNR分析显示,A组和C组表现相当,但两组均显著优于B组(A vs. B: p < 0.05;C vs. B: p < 0.05)。结论:采用CE-Boost技术结合深度学习重建的三低CCTA方案,在保持诊断图像质量(CNR和噪声水平与标准方案相当)的同时,减少了52%的辐射暴露和67.8%的造影剂使用。这证明了它在不影响诊断准确性的情况下重复冠状动脉评估的临床可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信