Spinal flexibility in idiopathic scoliosis: A quantitative approach to Grade I (facet joint osteotomy, FJO) and Grade II (ponte osteotomy, PO) osteotomy techniques.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1177/10225536251357770
Yibing Liu, Zhenzhuo Zhang, Guomao Zhu, Jinqian Liang
{"title":"Spinal flexibility in idiopathic scoliosis: A quantitative approach to Grade I (facet joint osteotomy, FJO) and Grade II (ponte osteotomy, PO) osteotomy techniques.","authors":"Yibing Liu, Zhenzhuo Zhang, Guomao Zhu, Jinqian Liang","doi":"10.1177/10225536251357770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of preoperative spinal flexibility in guiding osteotomy selection for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) surgery. Specifically, it aimed to identify a flexibility threshold to optimize the decision-making process between Grade I (Facet Joint Osteotomy, FJO) and Grade II (Ponte Osteotomy, PO) osteotomy techniques. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 77 IS patients who underwent osteotomy surgeries performed by two experienced spine surgeons at our hospital between 2018 and 2023. Based on the osteotomy type, patients were divided into the FJO group (<i>n</i> = 41) and the PO group (<i>n</i> = 36). Demographic data, preoperative spinal flexibility (measured as the ratio of curve correction on bending X-rays to the standing Cobb angle), and surgical correction rates were compared. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to identify the flexibility threshold. Complication rates, hospital stay duration, and blood loss were also analyzed. <b>Results:</b> RCS analysis identified a flexibility threshold of 0.657. Below this threshold, PO achieved superior correction rates, while above it, FJO showed comparable correction outcomes with fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower blood loss. Spinal flexibility was significantly correlated with surgical outcomes, and the type of osteotomy influenced correction rates and complication severity. <b>Conclusion:</b> Preoperative spinal flexibility is a critical factor in osteotomy selection for IS surgery. PO is recommended for flexibility <0.657, while FJO is preferred for higher flexibility. Flexibility-based surgical planning can improve correction outcomes, minimize complications, and enhance recovery in IS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"33 2","pages":"10225536251357770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536251357770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of preoperative spinal flexibility in guiding osteotomy selection for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) surgery. Specifically, it aimed to identify a flexibility threshold to optimize the decision-making process between Grade I (Facet Joint Osteotomy, FJO) and Grade II (Ponte Osteotomy, PO) osteotomy techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included 77 IS patients who underwent osteotomy surgeries performed by two experienced spine surgeons at our hospital between 2018 and 2023. Based on the osteotomy type, patients were divided into the FJO group (n = 41) and the PO group (n = 36). Demographic data, preoperative spinal flexibility (measured as the ratio of curve correction on bending X-rays to the standing Cobb angle), and surgical correction rates were compared. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to identify the flexibility threshold. Complication rates, hospital stay duration, and blood loss were also analyzed. Results: RCS analysis identified a flexibility threshold of 0.657. Below this threshold, PO achieved superior correction rates, while above it, FJO showed comparable correction outcomes with fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower blood loss. Spinal flexibility was significantly correlated with surgical outcomes, and the type of osteotomy influenced correction rates and complication severity. Conclusion: Preoperative spinal flexibility is a critical factor in osteotomy selection for IS surgery. PO is recommended for flexibility <0.657, while FJO is preferred for higher flexibility. Flexibility-based surgical planning can improve correction outcomes, minimize complications, and enhance recovery in IS patients.

特发性脊柱侧凸的脊柱灵活性:I级(小关节截骨术,FJO)和II级(桥骨截骨术,PO)截骨技术的定量方法。
目的:本研究的目的是评估术前脊柱柔韧性在指导特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)手术截骨选择中的作用。具体而言,该研究旨在确定一个灵活性阈值,以优化I级(Facet Joint Osteotomy, FJO)和II级(Ponte Osteotomy, PO)截骨技术之间的决策过程。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2018年至2023年在我院由两名经验丰富的脊柱外科医生进行截骨手术的77例IS患者。根据截骨方式将患者分为FJO组(n = 41)和PO组(n = 36)。比较人口统计学数据、术前脊柱柔韧性(以弯曲x线曲线矫正与站立Cobb角的比值衡量)和手术矫正率。采用限制三次样条(RCS)分析确定柔度阈值。同时分析了并发症发生率、住院时间和出血量。结果:RCS分析确定灵活性阈值为0.657。低于这个阈值,PO获得了更高的矫正率,而高于这个阈值,FJO显示了类似的矫正结果,并发症更少,住院时间更短,出血量更少。脊柱柔韧性与手术结果显著相关,截骨方式影响矫正率和并发症严重程度。结论:术前脊柱柔韧性是is手术截骨选择的关键因素。为了灵活,建议使用PO
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信