STEMI patients' demographics and outcomes by mode of emergency department arrival.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001767
Giuseppe Stirparo, Elena Maria Ticozzi, Laura Scudera, Maria Elena Ales, Annalisa Bodina, Gabriele Perotti, Fabrizio Ernesto Pregliasco, Carlo Signorelli, Massimo Lombardo
{"title":"STEMI patients' demographics and outcomes by mode of emergency department arrival.","authors":"Giuseppe Stirparo, Elena Maria Ticozzi, Laura Scudera, Maria Elena Ales, Annalisa Bodina, Gabriele Perotti, Fabrizio Ernesto Pregliasco, Carlo Signorelli, Massimo Lombardo","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify the demographic factors influencing the mode of emergency department (ED) admission among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), comparing those arriving by emergency medical services (EMS) versus walk-in patients, and to correlate them with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study utilized data provided by the regional emergency agency (AREU), analyzing ED admissions for STEMI across 120 hospitals in Lombardy between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022. The prevalence of EMS use and of walk-in patients was determined and the association between the mode of ED access and patient outcomes was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recorded 8235 STEMI cases, of which 58.4% presented at the ED via EMS. Younger and male patients were more likely to use self-transport. Age was positively correlated with EMS use, especially in cases with a red triage code. Patients accessing the ED independently were more likely to require secondary transport [odds ratio (OR) 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.17-4.51; P < 0.001]. One hundred and twenty-eight deaths were recorded, of which 96 (75%) occurred in patients over 75 years of age. Women were more likely to die than men (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.52-3.02; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of patients not using EMS highlights the need for public education on the importance of EMS as a means of transport and as a platform for early treatment. Public health campaigns should focus on raising awareness of gender differences in the presentation of STEMI and address treatment disparities to improve outcomes for all patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"501-507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to identify the demographic factors influencing the mode of emergency department (ED) admission among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), comparing those arriving by emergency medical services (EMS) versus walk-in patients, and to correlate them with outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized data provided by the regional emergency agency (AREU), analyzing ED admissions for STEMI across 120 hospitals in Lombardy between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022. The prevalence of EMS use and of walk-in patients was determined and the association between the mode of ED access and patient outcomes was assessed.

Results: We recorded 8235 STEMI cases, of which 58.4% presented at the ED via EMS. Younger and male patients were more likely to use self-transport. Age was positively correlated with EMS use, especially in cases with a red triage code. Patients accessing the ED independently were more likely to require secondary transport [odds ratio (OR) 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.17-4.51; P < 0.001]. One hundred and twenty-eight deaths were recorded, of which 96 (75%) occurred in patients over 75 years of age. Women were more likely to die than men (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.52-3.02; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The number of patients not using EMS highlights the need for public education on the importance of EMS as a means of transport and as a platform for early treatment. Public health campaigns should focus on raising awareness of gender differences in the presentation of STEMI and address treatment disparities to improve outcomes for all patient groups.

STEMI患者的人口学特征和急诊到达方式的结局。
目的:本研究的目的是确定影响st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者急诊科(ED)入院模式的人口统计学因素,比较急诊医疗服务(EMS)患者和非预约患者,并将其与预后联系起来。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究利用了地区急救机构(AREU)提供的数据,分析了伦巴第120家医院在2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间STEMI的急诊科入院情况。确定了EMS使用和上门患者的患病率,并评估了ED访问模式与患者预后之间的关系。结果:我们记录了8235例STEMI病例,其中58.4%通过EMS在ED就诊。年轻人和男性患者更倾向于使用自我运输。年龄与EMS的使用呈正相关,特别是在有红色分诊码的病例中。独立进入急诊科的患者更有可能需要二次转运[优势比(OR) 3.80, 95%可信区间(CI) 3.17-4.51;P < 0.001]。记录了128例死亡,其中96例(75%)发生在75岁以上的患者中。女性比男性更容易死亡(OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.52-3.02;P < 0.001)。结论:不使用EMS的患者数量突出了公众教育EMS作为一种交通工具和早期治疗平台的重要性的必要性。公共卫生运动应侧重于提高对STEMI表现中的性别差异的认识,并解决治疗差异,以改善所有患者群体的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信