Comparison of Cardiovascular and Perceptual Responses During Guideline-Recommended and Self-Selected Intensity Exercises in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Deivide Rafael Gomes de Faria, Max Duarte de Oliveira, Hélcio Kanegusuku, Breno Quintella Farah, Tiago Peçanha, Nelson Wolosker, Gabriel Grizzo Cucato, Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias, Marilia Almeida Correia
{"title":"Comparison of Cardiovascular and Perceptual Responses During Guideline-Recommended and Self-Selected Intensity Exercises in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study.","authors":"Deivide Rafael Gomes de Faria, Max Duarte de Oliveira, Hélcio Kanegusuku, Breno Quintella Farah, Tiago Peçanha, Nelson Wolosker, Gabriel Grizzo Cucato, Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias, Marilia Almeida Correia","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercises with a self-selected intensity (SSI) have emerged as an alternative to guideline-recommended sessions to improve adherence to exercise programs. We compared the cardiovascular and perceptual responses during a walking exercise performed at SSI and in a session with intensity recommended by clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients (mean 69.2 ± 7.7 years, 55% male, and mean ankle brachial index 0.59 ± 0.15) participated in two experimental sessions: guidelines (3-5 minutes of walking sets, 2-3 minutes of recovery, and moderate intensity by pain perception) and SSI (preferred walking speed and set duration) sessions. Blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability threshold, rating of perceived exertion, perception of pain, and affective response were assessed during the exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent of time, perceived exertion (∆0.8: 95% CI, 0.1-1.5, Psession = .035) and pain (∆0.6: 95% CI, 0.3-0.9, Psession < .001) were lower, while affective responses (∆-0.8: 95% CI, - 1.5 to -0.1, Psession = .029) were higher in SSI session compared to the guideline session. Independent of time, the heart rate (∆5.5: 95% CI, 1.2-9.8 beats/min, Psession = .013) was lower in the SSI session, while blood pressure responses were similar between sessions (Psession > .05). The time spent above the heart rate variability threshold was significantly lower in the SSI session (∆4.2: 95% CI, 1.6-7.0 minutes, Pinteraction = .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SSI sessions promoted lower cardiovascular overload and better perceptual responses than guideline sessions in patients with symptomatic PAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Exercises with a self-selected intensity (SSI) have emerged as an alternative to guideline-recommended sessions to improve adherence to exercise programs. We compared the cardiovascular and perceptual responses during a walking exercise performed at SSI and in a session with intensity recommended by clinical guidelines.

Methods: Twenty patients (mean 69.2 ± 7.7 years, 55% male, and mean ankle brachial index 0.59 ± 0.15) participated in two experimental sessions: guidelines (3-5 minutes of walking sets, 2-3 minutes of recovery, and moderate intensity by pain perception) and SSI (preferred walking speed and set duration) sessions. Blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability threshold, rating of perceived exertion, perception of pain, and affective response were assessed during the exercise.

Results: Independent of time, perceived exertion (∆0.8: 95% CI, 0.1-1.5, Psession = .035) and pain (∆0.6: 95% CI, 0.3-0.9, Psession < .001) were lower, while affective responses (∆-0.8: 95% CI, - 1.5 to -0.1, Psession = .029) were higher in SSI session compared to the guideline session. Independent of time, the heart rate (∆5.5: 95% CI, 1.2-9.8 beats/min, Psession = .013) was lower in the SSI session, while blood pressure responses were similar between sessions (Psession > .05). The time spent above the heart rate variability threshold was significantly lower in the SSI session (∆4.2: 95% CI, 1.6-7.0 minutes, Pinteraction = .005).

Conclusion: The SSI sessions promoted lower cardiovascular overload and better perceptual responses than guideline sessions in patients with symptomatic PAD.

外周动脉疾病患者在指南推荐和自选强度运动中心血管和知觉反应的比较:一项随机交叉研究
目的:自我选择强度(SSI)的运动已经成为指南推荐的运动的替代方案,以提高对运动计划的坚持。我们比较了在SSI进行的步行运动和临床指南推荐的强度运动期间的心血管和知觉反应。方法:20例患者(平均69.2±7.7岁,55%为男性,平均踝肱指数0.59±0.15)参加两个实验阶段:指导(3-5分钟步行组,2-3分钟恢复,疼痛感觉中等强度)和SSI(首选步行速度和设定时间)阶段。在运动过程中评估血压、心率、心率变异性阈值、感知运动等级、疼痛感知和情感反应。结果:与时间无关,SSI组的感觉运动(∆0.8:95% CI, 0.1-1.5, Psession = 0.035)和疼痛(∆0.6:95% CI, 0.3-0.9, Psession < .001)较低,而情感反应(∆0.8:95% CI, -1.5至-0.1,Psession = 0.029)较指南组高。与时间无关,SSI组的心率(∆5.5:95% CI, 1.2-9.8次/分钟,Psession = 0.013)较低,而两组之间的血压反应相似(Psession >.05)。在SSI阶段,高于心率变异性阈值的时间显著降低(∆4.2:95% CI, 1.6-7.0分钟,p交互作用= 0.005)。结论:在有症状的PAD患者中,与指南治疗相比,SSI治疗降低了心血管负荷,改善了感知反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
34.20%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP was the first, and remains the only, professional journal dedicated to improving multidisciplinary clinical practice and expanding research evidence specific to both cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes exercise testing and prescription, behavioral medicine, and cardiopulmonary risk factor management. In 2007, JCRP expanded its scope to include primary prevention of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. JCRP publishes scientific and clinical peer-reviewed Original Investigations, Reviews, and Brief or Case Reports focused on the causes, prevention, and treatment of individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases in both a print and online-only format. Editorial features include Editorials, Invited Commentaries, Literature Updates, and Clinically-relevant Topical Updates. JCRP is the official Journal of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信