The influence of case factors and system factors on the timeliness of testing and contact tracing for COVID-19 in The Netherlands.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jizzo R Bosdriesz, Elke M den Boogert, Suzan van Dijken, Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers, Hannelore M Götz, Irene E Goverse, Tjalling Leenstra, Mariska W F Petrignani, Stijn F H Raven, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Susan van den Hof, Kirsten Wevers, Amy A Matser
{"title":"The influence of case factors and system factors on the timeliness of testing and contact tracing for COVID-19 in The Netherlands.","authors":"Jizzo R Bosdriesz, Elke M den Boogert, Suzan van Dijken, Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers, Hannelore M Götz, Irene E Goverse, Tjalling Leenstra, Mariska W F Petrignani, Stijn F H Raven, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Susan van den Hof, Kirsten Wevers, Amy A Matser","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Source and contact tracing (SCT) is essential to control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and the timeliness of SCT is crucial. As little is known about its real-world effectiveness, we investigated the timeliness of SCT in the Netherlands and its determinants. We used routine COVID-19 SCT data from all individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at nine Dutch public health services between 1 June 2020 and 28 February 2021 (N = 384 591). We calculated median time intervals between SCT stages. We used multilevel logistic regression to study associations between case factors and system factors, and total SCT delay (symptom onset to SCT initiation >3 days), patient delay (symptom onset to making test appointment >1 day), and response delay (making test appointment to SCT initiation >2 days). The median total SCT interval time was 3 days (interquartile range 2-5). Older age and being a migrant had higher odds of delay; working in health care or education had lower odds of delay. A higher caseload and a scaled-down SCT had higher odds of delay. For age and country of birth, stronger associations with patient delay, and weaker associations with response delay were found. Although SCT during the COVID-19 pandemic might have had merits in prompting people to isolate or quarantine before the availability of a vaccine, the observed interval times indicate that SCT was not fast enough to have a large effect on interrupting transmission chains. Although promising, the added value of digital SCT tools remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Source and contact tracing (SCT) is essential to control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and the timeliness of SCT is crucial. As little is known about its real-world effectiveness, we investigated the timeliness of SCT in the Netherlands and its determinants. We used routine COVID-19 SCT data from all individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at nine Dutch public health services between 1 June 2020 and 28 February 2021 (N = 384 591). We calculated median time intervals between SCT stages. We used multilevel logistic regression to study associations between case factors and system factors, and total SCT delay (symptom onset to SCT initiation >3 days), patient delay (symptom onset to making test appointment >1 day), and response delay (making test appointment to SCT initiation >2 days). The median total SCT interval time was 3 days (interquartile range 2-5). Older age and being a migrant had higher odds of delay; working in health care or education had lower odds of delay. A higher caseload and a scaled-down SCT had higher odds of delay. For age and country of birth, stronger associations with patient delay, and weaker associations with response delay were found. Although SCT during the COVID-19 pandemic might have had merits in prompting people to isolate or quarantine before the availability of a vaccine, the observed interval times indicate that SCT was not fast enough to have a large effect on interrupting transmission chains. Although promising, the added value of digital SCT tools remains uncertain.

病例因素和制度因素对荷兰COVID-19检测和接触者追踪及时性的影响
源与接触者追踪(SCT)是控制SARS-CoV-2传播的必要手段,其及时性至关重要。由于对其现实世界的有效性知之甚少,我们调查了荷兰SCT的及时性及其决定因素。我们使用了2020年6月1日至2021年2月28日期间在荷兰9个公共卫生服务机构检测出SARS-CoV-2阳性的所有个体的常规COVID-19 SCT数据(N = 384 591)。我们计算了SCT分期之间的中位数时间间隔。我们使用多水平逻辑回归来研究病例因素和系统因素、总SCT延迟(症状出现至SCT开始bbb30天)、患者延迟(症状出现至预约测试>1天)和反应延迟(预约测试至SCT开始>2天)之间的关系。SCT总间隔时间中位数为3天(四分位数间距为2-5)。年龄较大和移民有更高的延迟几率;在医疗保健或教育领域工作的人延迟的几率较低。较高的病例量和按比例缩小的SCT有较高的延迟几率。对于年龄和出生国家,发现与患者延迟的相关性较强,与反应延迟的相关性较弱。尽管在COVID-19大流行期间,SCT可能在促使人们在疫苗可用之前进行隔离或隔离方面具有优点,但观察到的间隔时间表明,SCT的速度不够快,无法对中断传播链产生重大影响。尽管前景看好,但数字SCT工具的附加价值仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信