Fast evolution of SOS-independent multi-drug resistance in bacteria.

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI:10.7554/eLife.95058
Le Zhang, Yunpeng Guan, YuenYee Cheng, Nural N Cokcetin, Amy L Bottomley, Andrew Robinson, Elizabeth J Harry, Antoine M van Oijen, Qian Peter Su, Dayong Jin
{"title":"Fast evolution of SOS-independent multi-drug resistance in bacteria.","authors":"Le Zhang, Yunpeng Guan, YuenYee Cheng, Nural N Cokcetin, Amy L Bottomley, Andrew Robinson, Elizabeth J Harry, Antoine M van Oijen, Qian Peter Su, Dayong Jin","doi":"10.7554/eLife.95058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The killing mechanism of many antibiotics involves the induction of DNA damage, either directly or indirectly, which activates the SOS response. RecA, the master regulator of the SOS response, has been shown to play a central role in the evolution of resistance to fluoroquinolones, even after short-term exposure. While this paradigm is well established for DNA-damaging antibiotics, it remains unclear whether β-lactams elicit similar resistance dynamics or depend on RecA and SOS-mediated mechanisms. In this study, we observed a rapid and stable evolution of β-lactam resistance (20-fold MIC increase within 8 hr) in <i>Escherichia coli</i> lacking RecA after a single exposure to ampicillin. Contrary to expectation, this resistance emerged through an SOS-independent mechanism involving two distinct evolutionary forces: increased mutational supply and antibiotic-driven selection. Specifically, we found that RecA deletion impaired DNA repair and downregulated base excision repair pathways, while concurrently repressing the transcription of antioxidative defence genes. This dual impairment led to excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn promoted the emergence of resistance-conferring mutations. While ampicillin treatment did not alter survival, it selectively enriched for rare mutants arising in the RecA-deficient and ROS-elevated background. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that this oxidative environment, together with compromised DNA repair capacity, increases genetic instability and creates a selective landscape favouring the expansion of resistant clones. These results highlight the repair-redox axis as a key determinant of bacterial evolvability under antimicrobial stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The killing mechanism of many antibiotics involves the induction of DNA damage, either directly or indirectly, which activates the SOS response. RecA, the master regulator of the SOS response, has been shown to play a central role in the evolution of resistance to fluoroquinolones, even after short-term exposure. While this paradigm is well established for DNA-damaging antibiotics, it remains unclear whether β-lactams elicit similar resistance dynamics or depend on RecA and SOS-mediated mechanisms. In this study, we observed a rapid and stable evolution of β-lactam resistance (20-fold MIC increase within 8 hr) in Escherichia coli lacking RecA after a single exposure to ampicillin. Contrary to expectation, this resistance emerged through an SOS-independent mechanism involving two distinct evolutionary forces: increased mutational supply and antibiotic-driven selection. Specifically, we found that RecA deletion impaired DNA repair and downregulated base excision repair pathways, while concurrently repressing the transcription of antioxidative defence genes. This dual impairment led to excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn promoted the emergence of resistance-conferring mutations. While ampicillin treatment did not alter survival, it selectively enriched for rare mutants arising in the RecA-deficient and ROS-elevated background. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that this oxidative environment, together with compromised DNA repair capacity, increases genetic instability and creates a selective landscape favouring the expansion of resistant clones. These results highlight the repair-redox axis as a key determinant of bacterial evolvability under antimicrobial stress.

细菌不依赖于sos的多药耐药性的快速进化。
许多抗生素的杀伤机制包括直接或间接地诱导DNA损伤,从而激活SOS反应。RecA是SOS反应的主要调节因子,已被证明在氟喹诺酮类药物耐药性的演变中发挥核心作用,即使在短期接触后也是如此。虽然这种模式在dna损伤抗生素中已经建立,但尚不清楚β-内酰胺是否会引起类似的耐药动力学或依赖于RecA和sos介导的机制。在这项研究中,我们观察到缺乏RecA的大肠杆菌在单次暴露于氨苄西林后,β-内酰胺耐药性快速而稳定地进化(8小时内MIC增加20倍)。与预期相反,这种耐药性是通过一种独立于sos的机制出现的,涉及两种不同的进化力量:增加的突变供应和抗生素驱动的选择。具体来说,我们发现RecA缺失会损害DNA修复并下调碱基切除修复途径,同时抑制抗氧化防御基因的转录。这种双重损伤导致活性氧(ROS)的过度积累,进而促进了赋予抗性的突变的出现。虽然氨苄西林治疗不改变生存,但它选择性地富集了在reca缺乏和ros升高背景下产生的罕见突变。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,这种氧化环境,加上受损的DNA修复能力,增加了遗传不稳定性,并创造了有利于抗性克隆扩张的选择性景观。这些结果强调修复-氧化还原轴是细菌在抗微生物胁迫下进化的关键决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信