Does Surgical Position Affect Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Wangxin Liu, Qi Zhang, Enpeng Gu, Huihui Sun, Lei Liu, Zhicheng Pan
{"title":"Does Surgical Position Affect Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Wangxin Liu, Qi Zhang, Enpeng Gu, Huihui Sun, Lei Liu, Zhicheng Pan","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different surgical positions on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The effect of lateral position (LP) versus prone position (PP) on PTED efficacy and patient satisfaction has not been entirely investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes 85 patients who underwent PTED surgery for lumbar disc herniation from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, at Binhai New District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The patients were categorized into the LP group (n=43) and the PP group (n=42) according to the different positions when they underwent PTED surgery. The demographic data, preoperative data, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, operative duration time, length of postoperative hospital stay, VAS scores, lumbar JOA scores, complications, and patient satisfaction were all compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PP in PTED reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy times and operative duration compared with LP. The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy times for the 42 patients in the PP group were 7.52 (SD: 1.79) compared with 12.26 (SD: 2.11) for 43 patients in the LP group, a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 3.88-5.59, P<0.001). The mean operative duration time was 84.16 minutes (SD: 11.67) in the PP group and 76.48 minutes (SD: 8.77) in the LP group, with a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 9.17- 18.21, P<0.001). Forty-one patients in the PP group (97.62%) and 38 patients in the PP group (88.37%) were satisfied with the surgery (P=0.027). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, postoperative VAS scores (1 d, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo) and postoperative JOA scores (1 wk, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTED performed in the PP has fewer fluoroscopy times, shorter operative duration, and higher satisfaction with postoperative rehabilitation after the surgery. No difference existed in postoperative recovery between the 2 groups. However, more studies are needed to further evaluate the effect of surgical position on surgery and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: A retrospective, single-center study.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different surgical positions on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED).
Summary of background data: The effect of lateral position (LP) versus prone position (PP) on PTED efficacy and patient satisfaction has not been entirely investigated.
Methods: This study includes 85 patients who underwent PTED surgery for lumbar disc herniation from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, at Binhai New District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The patients were categorized into the LP group (n=43) and the PP group (n=42) according to the different positions when they underwent PTED surgery. The demographic data, preoperative data, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, operative duration time, length of postoperative hospital stay, VAS scores, lumbar JOA scores, complications, and patient satisfaction were all compared between the 2 groups.
Results: PP in PTED reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy times and operative duration compared with LP. The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy times for the 42 patients in the PP group were 7.52 (SD: 1.79) compared with 12.26 (SD: 2.11) for 43 patients in the LP group, a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 3.88-5.59, P<0.001). The mean operative duration time was 84.16 minutes (SD: 11.67) in the PP group and 76.48 minutes (SD: 8.77) in the LP group, with a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 9.17- 18.21, P<0.001). Forty-one patients in the PP group (97.62%) and 38 patients in the PP group (88.37%) were satisfied with the surgery (P=0.027). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, postoperative VAS scores (1 d, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo) and postoperative JOA scores (1 wk, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo).
Conclusion: PTED performed in the PP has fewer fluoroscopy times, shorter operative duration, and higher satisfaction with postoperative rehabilitation after the surgery. No difference existed in postoperative recovery between the 2 groups. However, more studies are needed to further evaluate the effect of surgical position on surgery and clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.