Firesorb bioresorbable scaffold for de novo coronary artery disease: 1-year clinical outcomes.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jun Jiang, Changling Li, Delong Chen, Lei Song, Zhanqian Cui, Ping Li, Lijun Gan, Yundai Chen, Hui Li, Shaobin Jia, Shenghu He, Wen Lu, Runlin Gao, Jianan Wang
{"title":"Firesorb bioresorbable scaffold for de novo coronary artery disease: 1-year clinical outcomes.","authors":"Jun Jiang, Changling Li, Delong Chen, Lei Song, Zhanqian Cui, Ping Li, Lijun Gan, Yundai Chen, Hui Li, Shaobin Jia, Shenghu He, Wen Lu, Runlin Gao, Jianan Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04254-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have been associated with higher rates of device-related adverse outcomes in comparison to everolimus-eluting stents. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the thinner-strut (100/125 μm) poly-L-lactic acid-based sirolimus-eluting Firesorb BRS in patients with de novo coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-level data derived from 1205 patients in the FUTURE-II RCT (n = 215) and FUTURE-III registry (n = 990) were prospectively collected, pooled, and analyzed. The primary endpoint of 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1-year follow-up, the cumulative rate of TLF was 1.67%, with an upper 95% confidence interval of 2.57%, significantly lower than the objective performance criterion goal of 6.6% (P < 0.001). The rate of single TLF components was 0.42% for cardiac death, 0.92% for target vessel myocardial infarction, and 0.42% for ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The cumulative rate of POCE at 1 year was 3.34%. No patient experienced definite or probable device thrombosis during 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pooled, patient-level analysis indicates that the thinner strut Firesorb BRS exhibits promising 1-year efficacy and safety profiles with regard to TLF. However, our findings are only applicable to non-complex lesions; large-scale randomized clinical trials powered to assess clinical endpoints are necessary to evaluate the strategy of Firesorb BRS compared to drug-eluting stents.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02890160 and NCT03660202.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"419"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04254-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have been associated with higher rates of device-related adverse outcomes in comparison to everolimus-eluting stents. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the thinner-strut (100/125 μm) poly-L-lactic acid-based sirolimus-eluting Firesorb BRS in patients with de novo coronary lesions.

Methods: Patient-level data derived from 1205 patients in the FUTURE-II RCT (n = 215) and FUTURE-III registry (n = 990) were prospectively collected, pooled, and analyzed. The primary endpoint of 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization was also analyzed.

Results: At 1-year follow-up, the cumulative rate of TLF was 1.67%, with an upper 95% confidence interval of 2.57%, significantly lower than the objective performance criterion goal of 6.6% (P < 0.001). The rate of single TLF components was 0.42% for cardiac death, 0.92% for target vessel myocardial infarction, and 0.42% for ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The cumulative rate of POCE at 1 year was 3.34%. No patient experienced definite or probable device thrombosis during 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions: This pooled, patient-level analysis indicates that the thinner strut Firesorb BRS exhibits promising 1-year efficacy and safety profiles with regard to TLF. However, our findings are only applicable to non-complex lesions; large-scale randomized clinical trials powered to assess clinical endpoints are necessary to evaluate the strategy of Firesorb BRS compared to drug-eluting stents.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02890160 and NCT03660202.

Firesorb生物可吸收支架治疗新发冠状动脉疾病:1年临床结果
背景:与依维莫司洗脱支架相比,第一代生物可吸收支架(BRS)具有更高的器械相关不良后果发生率。我们的目的是评估薄支架(100/125 μm)聚l -乳酸基西罗莫司洗脱的Firesorb BRS在新发冠状动脉病变患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:前瞻性收集来自FUTURE-II RCT (n = 215)和FUTURE-III注册表(n = 990) 1205例患者的患者水平数据,并进行汇总和分析。1年靶病变衰竭(TLF)的主要终点被定义为心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建的复合终点。还分析了全因死亡、任何心肌梗死或任何血运重建术的面向患者的复合终点(POCE)。结果:1年随访时,TLF的累计发生率为1.67%,95%置信区间为2.57%,显著低于6.6%的客观疗效标准目标(P)。结论:本汇总的患者水平分析表明,薄支架firesb BRS在TLF方面具有良好的1年疗效和安全性。然而,我们的发现仅适用于非复杂病变;与药物洗脱支架相比,评估临床终点的大规模随机临床试验是评估firesb BRS策略的必要条件。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02890160和NCT03660202。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信