Resistance training in cachectic pancreatic and lung cancer patients: randomised controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Timo Niels, Lisa Stich, Stefanie Siebert, Sarah Man, Nico DeLazzari, Mitra Tewes, Helen Schörghofer, Dirk Waldschmidt, Freerk T Baumann
{"title":"Resistance training in cachectic pancreatic and lung cancer patients: randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Timo Niels, Lisa Stich, Stefanie Siebert, Sarah Man, Nico DeLazzari, Mitra Tewes, Helen Schörghofer, Dirk Waldschmidt, Freerk T Baumann","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pancreatic and lung cancer are associated with cancer cachexia (CC), which negatively impacts patients' quality of life, treatment outcomes and prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a 24-week eccentrically overloaded resistance training (ERT) in patients with CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>22 patients with pancreatic or lung cancer and CC were randomised (2:1) to either supervised ERT (n=14) and usual care (UC, n=8). ERT was performed twice weekly for 24 weeks. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment rate, dropouts, adverse events (AEs) and exercise adherence. Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical performance and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression, anorexia-cachexia symptoms and physical activity levels. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 12 weeks (ITT1) and after 24 weeks (ITT2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recruitment rate was 21.8%. 10 dropouts (45.5%) were recorded (ERT: n=7, UC n=3). Clinical AEs were comparable between the groups. Two AEs occurred during or after an exercise session, but resolved completely. The exercise adherence was 63.7%. After 12 weeks, the ERT group improved significantly in aerobic capacity, functional strength and several PROs, while the UC group improved in PROs depression and physical activity levels. After 24 weeks, body composition worsened in the UC group compared with the ERT group (p=0.026). Intragroup analysis showed improvements in PRO domains in the ERT group and decreases of the phase angle in the UC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Supervised ERT seems feasible in cachectic cancer patients and may preserve or enhance physical performance, constitution and PROs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pancreatic and lung cancer are associated with cancer cachexia (CC), which negatively impacts patients' quality of life, treatment outcomes and prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a 24-week eccentrically overloaded resistance training (ERT) in patients with CC.

Methods: 22 patients with pancreatic or lung cancer and CC were randomised (2:1) to either supervised ERT (n=14) and usual care (UC, n=8). ERT was performed twice weekly for 24 weeks. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment rate, dropouts, adverse events (AEs) and exercise adherence. Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical performance and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression, anorexia-cachexia symptoms and physical activity levels. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 12 weeks (ITT1) and after 24 weeks (ITT2).

Results: The recruitment rate was 21.8%. 10 dropouts (45.5%) were recorded (ERT: n=7, UC n=3). Clinical AEs were comparable between the groups. Two AEs occurred during or after an exercise session, but resolved completely. The exercise adherence was 63.7%. After 12 weeks, the ERT group improved significantly in aerobic capacity, functional strength and several PROs, while the UC group improved in PROs depression and physical activity levels. After 24 weeks, body composition worsened in the UC group compared with the ERT group (p=0.026). Intragroup analysis showed improvements in PRO domains in the ERT group and decreases of the phase angle in the UC group.

Conclusions: Supervised ERT seems feasible in cachectic cancer patients and may preserve or enhance physical performance, constitution and PROs.

抗阻训练在恶性胰腺癌和肺癌患者中的应用:随机对照试验。
目的:胰腺癌和肺癌与癌症恶病质(CC)相关,对患者的生活质量、治疗结果和预后产生负面影响。本研究旨在评估24周离心负荷阻力训练(ERT)在CC患者中的可行性和有效性。方法:22例胰腺癌或肺癌合并CC患者随机(2:1)分为监督ERT组(n=14)和常规护理组(UC, n=8)。ERT每周2次,连续24周。通过招募率、退出、不良事件(ae)和运动依从性来评估可行性。次要结局包括身体组成、身体表现和患者报告的生活质量、疲劳、焦虑和抑郁、厌食症-恶病质症状和身体活动水平。在基线、12周(ITT1)和24周(ITT2)后进行评估。结果:录取率为21.8%。中途退学10例(45.5%)(ERT =7, UC =3)。两组间的临床ae具有可比性。两个不良事件发生在运动期间或之后,但完全解决。运动依从性为63.7%。12周后,ERT组在有氧能力、功能强度和几个PROs方面有显著改善,而UC组在PROs抑郁和身体活动水平方面有改善。24周后,UC组的体成分较ERT组恶化(p=0.026)。组内分析显示ERT组PRO结构域改善,UC组相位角减小。结论:有监督的ERT治疗在恶性肿瘤患者中似乎是可行的,可以保持或提高身体机能、体质和PROs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信