The Forefront of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Our History of Treatment Optimisation Over 30 Years and the Modern Outcomes.

Q2 Medicine
Yuki Shinya, Hirotaka Hasegawa, Motoyuki Umekawa, Masahiro Shin, Mariko Kawashima, Satoshi Koizumi, Atsuto Katano, Yuichi Suzuki, Taichi Kin, Nobuhito Saito
{"title":"The Forefront of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Our History of Treatment Optimisation Over 30 Years and the Modern Outcomes.","authors":"Yuki Shinya, Hirotaka Hasegawa, Motoyuki Umekawa, Masahiro Shin, Mariko Kawashima, Satoshi Koizumi, Atsuto Katano, Yuichi Suzuki, Taichi Kin, Nobuhito Saito","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-89844-0_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can cause cerebral haemorrhage, associated morbidity, and mortality if left untreated. Therefore, prophylactic interventions are essential to manage these lesions. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience of incorporating new technologies into gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for AVMs, aiming to improve its effectiveness and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study that included 1032 patients with AVMs who underwent GKRS at our institution from 1990 to 2022. We reviewed the detailed treatment techniques and updates on GKRS, including tractography-guided identification of critical white matter fibres for eloquent AVMs, GKRS with minimal targeting embolisation for high-haemorrhage risk AVMs, and rotational angiography based GKRS for all AVMs. We evaluated the GKRS outcomes for AVM obliteration, post-GKRS haemorrhage, survival, post-GKRS signal changes, and neurological preservation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected data from 90 patients by using the most advanced techniques. The cumulative obliteration rates were 61.0% at 3 years and 81.6% at 4 years, and the cumulative post-GKRS haemorrhage rates were 2.2% at 2 years and 3.6% at 5 years. Post-GKRS haemorrhage resulted in mortality in one patient (1.1%). Post-GKRS signal change was observed in 31 patients (34%), but only one (1.0%) developed a neurological deficit. Therefore, the cumulative neurological preservation rate was 97.8% at 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GKRS is a safe and effective treatment for AVMs. The continuous development and use of advanced techniques can lead to favourable outcomes for AVMs. However, further studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups, as well as an analysis of late adverse events, are necessary to better understand the efficacy and safety of GKRS for AVMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":6913,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement","volume":"136 ","pages":"47-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89844-0_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can cause cerebral haemorrhage, associated morbidity, and mortality if left untreated. Therefore, prophylactic interventions are essential to manage these lesions. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience of incorporating new technologies into gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for AVMs, aiming to improve its effectiveness and safety.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study that included 1032 patients with AVMs who underwent GKRS at our institution from 1990 to 2022. We reviewed the detailed treatment techniques and updates on GKRS, including tractography-guided identification of critical white matter fibres for eloquent AVMs, GKRS with minimal targeting embolisation for high-haemorrhage risk AVMs, and rotational angiography based GKRS for all AVMs. We evaluated the GKRS outcomes for AVM obliteration, post-GKRS haemorrhage, survival, post-GKRS signal changes, and neurological preservation.

Results: We collected data from 90 patients by using the most advanced techniques. The cumulative obliteration rates were 61.0% at 3 years and 81.6% at 4 years, and the cumulative post-GKRS haemorrhage rates were 2.2% at 2 years and 3.6% at 5 years. Post-GKRS haemorrhage resulted in mortality in one patient (1.1%). Post-GKRS signal change was observed in 31 patients (34%), but only one (1.0%) developed a neurological deficit. Therefore, the cumulative neurological preservation rate was 97.8% at 5 years.

Conclusions: GKRS is a safe and effective treatment for AVMs. The continuous development and use of advanced techniques can lead to favourable outcomes for AVMs. However, further studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups, as well as an analysis of late adverse events, are necessary to better understand the efficacy and safety of GKRS for AVMs.

伽玛刀放射治疗脑动静脉畸形的前沿:我们30多年的治疗优化历史和现代结果。
背景:如果不及时治疗,脑动静脉畸形(AVMs)可导致脑出血,相关的发病率和死亡率。因此,预防性干预对于控制这些病变至关重要。本研究的目的是描述我们将新技术纳入伽玛刀放射手术(GKRS)治疗avm的经验,旨在提高其有效性和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,纳入了1990年至2022年在我院接受GKRS治疗的1032例avm患者。我们回顾了GKRS的详细治疗技术和最新进展,包括动脉束造影引导下识别无血流障碍avm的关键白质纤维,微创靶向栓塞治疗高风险avm的GKRS,以及基于旋转血管造影的GKRS治疗所有avm。我们评估了GKRS的结果,包括AVM消除、GKRS后出血、生存、GKRS后信号改变和神经保护。结果:我们采用最先进的技术收集了90例患者的数据。3年和4年的累计闭塞率分别为61.0%和81.6%,2年和5年的累计gkrs后出血率分别为2.2%和3.6%。gkrs后出血导致1例患者死亡(1.1%)。31例(34%)患者观察到gkrs后信号改变,但只有1例(1.0%)出现神经功能障碍。5年累计神经功能保存率为97.8%。结论:GKRS是一种安全有效的治疗avm的方法。不断发展和使用先进的技术可以为avm带来有利的结果。然而,为了更好地了解GKRS治疗avm的有效性和安全性,有必要进行更大样本和更长随访的进一步研究,以及对晚期不良事件的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: In addition to the regular journal, "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes 3-4 supplement volumes per year. These comprise proceedings of international meetings or other material of general neurosurgical interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信