Enhancing long-form question answering via reflection with question decomposition

IF 6.9 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Junjie Xiao , Wei Wu , Jiaxu Zhao , Meng Fang , Jianxin Wang
{"title":"Enhancing long-form question answering via reflection with question decomposition","authors":"Junjie Xiao ,&nbsp;Wei Wu ,&nbsp;Jiaxu Zhao ,&nbsp;Meng Fang ,&nbsp;Jianxin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-Form Question Answering (LFQA) requires multi-paragraph responses that explain, contextualize and justify an answer rather than returning a single fact. Large proprietary language models can meet this bar, but privacy, cost and hardware limits often force practitioners to rely on much smaller, locally hosted models — whose outputs are typically shallow or incomplete. We introduce Decomposition-Reflection, a training-free prompting framework that (i) decomposes a user question into the complementary sub-questions, (ii) answers each one, and (iii) runs a lightweight self-reflection loop after every stage to enhance the comprehensiveness, entailment and factuality of the results before synthesizing the final response. Across three LFQA benchmarks, the proposed approach raises ROUGE and LLM-based factuality scores over strong chain-of-thought and self-refinement baselines. Ablation study confirms that removing either decomposition or reflection sharply degrades coverage and entailment, underscoring the importance of both components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 6","pages":"Article 104274"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325002158","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-Form Question Answering (LFQA) requires multi-paragraph responses that explain, contextualize and justify an answer rather than returning a single fact. Large proprietary language models can meet this bar, but privacy, cost and hardware limits often force practitioners to rely on much smaller, locally hosted models — whose outputs are typically shallow or incomplete. We introduce Decomposition-Reflection, a training-free prompting framework that (i) decomposes a user question into the complementary sub-questions, (ii) answers each one, and (iii) runs a lightweight self-reflection loop after every stage to enhance the comprehensiveness, entailment and factuality of the results before synthesizing the final response. Across three LFQA benchmarks, the proposed approach raises ROUGE and LLM-based factuality scores over strong chain-of-thought and self-refinement baselines. Ablation study confirms that removing either decomposition or reflection sharply degrades coverage and entailment, underscoring the importance of both components.
通过问题分解的反思来增强长形式的问题回答
长形式问答(LFQA)需要多段的回答来解释,背景和证明一个答案,而不是返回一个单一的事实。大型专有语言模型可以满足这一要求,但隐私、成本和硬件限制往往迫使从业者依赖更小的本地托管模型——其输出通常是肤浅的或不完整的。我们引入了分解-反思,这是一个无需培训的提示框架,它(i)将用户问题分解为互补的子问题,(ii)回答每个问题,以及(iii)在每个阶段之后运行一个轻量级的自我反思循环,以增强结果的全面性、蕴意性和真实性,然后再综合最终的响应。通过三个LFQA基准,建议的方法在强大的思想链和自我改进基线上提高了ROUGE和基于llm的事实分数。消融研究证实,去除分解或反射会显著降低覆盖度和蕴涵,强调这两个组成部分的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信