Moving Past a Legacy of Controlling Women: Key Frameworks to Center Women and Girls’ Choice and Agency in Sexual and Reproductive Health Measurement

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Christine Dehlendorf, Karen Hardee, Evelyne Opondo, Anita Raj
{"title":"Moving Past a Legacy of Controlling Women: Key Frameworks to Center Women and Girls’ Choice and Agency in Sexual and Reproductive Health Measurement","authors":"Christine Dehlendorf, Karen Hardee, Evelyne Opondo, Anita Raj","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the global community looks beyond the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals agenda, there is a critical opportunity to refine and elevate indicators focused on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and to shift nations away from fertility and contraceptive targets. This commentary presents four key frameworks—drawn from a panel at an International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) meeting focused on SRHR measurements—that offer distinct yet complementary lenses for understanding and measuring reproductive choice and agency. These include the EMERGE Empowerment Framework (focused on measurement and evaluation), Patient‐Centered Care (focused on clinical practice), the Human Rights Framework (focused on policy), and Reproductive Justice (focused on social change). While not an exhaustive list, these frameworks reflect a diversity of disciplinary perspectives and emphasize the importance of grounding reproductive health indicators in concepts of choice and agency. The empowerment framework centers on individual decision‐making and collective action, while person‐centered and rights‐based approaches evaluate how health systems and policies support or constrain that agency. Reproductive justice expands the lens further, highlighting how structural inequalities shape differential access and outcomes across race, class, and other social determinants of health. Together, these frameworks underscore the need for multilevel, intersectional indicators or reproductive agency—spanning individuals, health systems, communities, and policies—to effectively guide and evaluate the impact of reproductive health programs and policies at scale.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the global community looks beyond the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals agenda, there is a critical opportunity to refine and elevate indicators focused on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and to shift nations away from fertility and contraceptive targets. This commentary presents four key frameworks—drawn from a panel at an International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) meeting focused on SRHR measurements—that offer distinct yet complementary lenses for understanding and measuring reproductive choice and agency. These include the EMERGE Empowerment Framework (focused on measurement and evaluation), Patient‐Centered Care (focused on clinical practice), the Human Rights Framework (focused on policy), and Reproductive Justice (focused on social change). While not an exhaustive list, these frameworks reflect a diversity of disciplinary perspectives and emphasize the importance of grounding reproductive health indicators in concepts of choice and agency. The empowerment framework centers on individual decision‐making and collective action, while person‐centered and rights‐based approaches evaluate how health systems and policies support or constrain that agency. Reproductive justice expands the lens further, highlighting how structural inequalities shape differential access and outcomes across race, class, and other social determinants of health. Together, these frameworks underscore the need for multilevel, intersectional indicators or reproductive agency—spanning individuals, health systems, communities, and policies—to effectively guide and evaluate the impact of reproductive health programs and policies at scale.
超越控制妇女的遗产:在性健康和生殖健康测量中以妇女和女孩的选择和代理为中心的关键框架
随着国际社会将目光投向2030年可持续发展目标议程之外,现在是完善和提升以性健康和生殖健康及权利为重点的指标,并使各国摆脱生育和避孕目标的关键机会。这篇评论提出了四个关键框架——来自国际人口科学研究联盟(IUSSP)会议上的一个小组,重点关注SRHR的测量——它们为理解和测量生殖选择和代理提供了不同但互补的视角。这些框架包括“涌现赋权框架”(侧重于测量和评估)、“以患者为中心的护理”(侧重于临床实践)、“人权框架”(侧重于政策)和“生殖正义”(侧重于社会变革)。这些框架虽然不是详尽的清单,但反映了不同学科的观点,并强调了将生殖健康指标建立在选择和代理概念基础上的重要性。赋权框架以个人决策和集体行动为中心,而以人为本和基于权利的方法则评估卫生系统和政策如何支持或限制该机构。生殖正义进一步扩大了镜头,突出了结构性不平等如何影响种族、阶级和其他健康社会决定因素之间的差异获取和结果。总之,这些框架强调需要多层次、交叉的指标或生殖机构——跨越个人、卫生系统、社区和政策——以有效地指导和评估大规模生殖健康规划和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信