Samuel L Paravizzini, Linda M Haugaard-Kedström, Craig A Hutton, John Andrew Karas
{"title":"Backbone Protecting Groups for Enhanced Peptide and Protein Synthesis.","authors":"Samuel L Paravizzini, Linda M Haugaard-Kedström, Craig A Hutton, John Andrew Karas","doi":"10.1002/anie.202509939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid-phase peptide synthesis has become an indispensable technique for the routine preparation of linear peptides of up to ~40 amino acids in length. However, the solid-phase approach is still hampered by chain insolubility and aggregation, which reduces synthetic yields. Moreover, many of the deletion impurities that can form are often chromatographically inseparable from the target sequence, which diminishes final product purity. The use of backbone N-protecting groups can ameliorate this synthetic inefficiency by increasing peptide chain solubility and suppressing aggregation. Backbone protection is also useful for promoting peptide macrocyclisation, suppressing common side reactions in peptide chemistry and improving solution-phase handling. Commercially available precursors containing benzyl-based groups and pseudoprolines have found widespread use, in academic laboratories and industry. A range of other strategies have also been investigated, in a bid to increase the utility of backbone protecting groups, and to develop more efficient methods for their introduction and removal. This review provides a comprehensive account of the state of the art, and includes detailed synthetic methods relating to the use of backbone protection, and its application to \"difficult\" peptides and proteins of biological significance. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are analysed, and a commentary on future directions is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":520556,"journal":{"name":"Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)","volume":" ","pages":"e202509939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202509939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Solid-phase peptide synthesis has become an indispensable technique for the routine preparation of linear peptides of up to ~40 amino acids in length. However, the solid-phase approach is still hampered by chain insolubility and aggregation, which reduces synthetic yields. Moreover, many of the deletion impurities that can form are often chromatographically inseparable from the target sequence, which diminishes final product purity. The use of backbone N-protecting groups can ameliorate this synthetic inefficiency by increasing peptide chain solubility and suppressing aggregation. Backbone protection is also useful for promoting peptide macrocyclisation, suppressing common side reactions in peptide chemistry and improving solution-phase handling. Commercially available precursors containing benzyl-based groups and pseudoprolines have found widespread use, in academic laboratories and industry. A range of other strategies have also been investigated, in a bid to increase the utility of backbone protecting groups, and to develop more efficient methods for their introduction and removal. This review provides a comprehensive account of the state of the art, and includes detailed synthetic methods relating to the use of backbone protection, and its application to "difficult" peptides and proteins of biological significance. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are analysed, and a commentary on future directions is provided.