Yookyung Jang, Tai Yeon Koo, Young-Eun Choi, Cheol Woong Jung, Young Ju Oh, Heungman Jun, Sewon Oh, Sang-Kyung Jo, Myung-Gyu Kim
{"title":"Impact of probiotic supplementation on kidney transplantation outcomes: a retrospective propensity score matched study.","authors":"Yookyung Jang, Tai Yeon Koo, Young-Eun Choi, Cheol Woong Jung, Young Ju Oh, Heungman Jun, Sewon Oh, Sang-Kyung Jo, Myung-Gyu Kim","doi":"10.4285/ctr.25.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential benefits and risks of probiotic use in kidney transplant (KT) recipients remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplementation on KT outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records from 354 KT recipients between January 2010 and December 2020. Only patients who received probiotics within the first year following transplantation were included, and transplant outcomes were assessed at 1-3 years after KT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 354 patients, 97 (27%) received probiotics during the study period, and 36 (10%) used them for more than 3 months. Probiotic types included <i>Lactobacillus</i> species (45.4%), <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> (14.4%), and others (40.2%). The average supplementation duration was 104.8 days. No significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 and 3 years posttransplantation were observed between the probiotic and nonprobiotic groups. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia developed in 61 patients, with a significantly higher incidence observed in the probiotic group (25.8% vs. 14.0%). However, there were no significant differences in BK viremia or coronavirus disease 2019 infection rates between groups. During the study period, 116 patients received antibiotics for more than 1 week, and the prevalence of bacterial infections was not significantly different between the two groups. After propensity score matching, probiotic supplementation remained significantly associated only with the development of CMV viremia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a significant association between probiotic use and the occurrence of CMV viremia in KT recipients. To better define the safety and efficacy of probiotics in immunocompromised patients, large-scale prospective studies are necessary to establish comprehensive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":519901,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplantation and research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical transplantation and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/ctr.25.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The potential benefits and risks of probiotic use in kidney transplant (KT) recipients remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplementation on KT outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records from 354 KT recipients between January 2010 and December 2020. Only patients who received probiotics within the first year following transplantation were included, and transplant outcomes were assessed at 1-3 years after KT.
Results: Among the 354 patients, 97 (27%) received probiotics during the study period, and 36 (10%) used them for more than 3 months. Probiotic types included Lactobacillus species (45.4%), Bacillus subtilis (14.4%), and others (40.2%). The average supplementation duration was 104.8 days. No significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 and 3 years posttransplantation were observed between the probiotic and nonprobiotic groups. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia developed in 61 patients, with a significantly higher incidence observed in the probiotic group (25.8% vs. 14.0%). However, there were no significant differences in BK viremia or coronavirus disease 2019 infection rates between groups. During the study period, 116 patients received antibiotics for more than 1 week, and the prevalence of bacterial infections was not significantly different between the two groups. After propensity score matching, probiotic supplementation remained significantly associated only with the development of CMV viremia.
Conclusions: This study identified a significant association between probiotic use and the occurrence of CMV viremia in KT recipients. To better define the safety and efficacy of probiotics in immunocompromised patients, large-scale prospective studies are necessary to establish comprehensive evidence.
背景:在肾移植(KT)受者中使用益生菌的潜在益处和风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估益生菌补充对KT结局的影响。方法:对2010年1月至2020年12月期间3554名KT受者的病历进行回顾性分析。仅纳入移植后一年内接受益生菌治疗的患者,并在KT后1-3年评估移植结果。结果:354例患者中,97例(27%)在研究期间服用益生菌,36例(10%)使用时间超过3个月。益生菌类型包括乳杆菌(45.4%)、枯草芽孢杆菌(14.4%)和其他(40.2%)。平均添加时间为104.8天。在移植后1年和3年,益生菌组和非益生菌组的肾小球滤过率没有显著差异。61例患者出现巨细胞病毒(CMV)病毒血症,其中益生菌组的发病率明显更高(25.8% vs. 14.0%)。然而,BK病毒血症和2019冠状病毒病的感染率在两组之间没有显著差异。研究期间,116例患者抗生素使用时间超过1周,两组患者细菌感染发生率无显著差异。在倾向评分匹配后,益生菌补充仍然仅与巨细胞病毒血症的发展显著相关。结论:本研究确定了KT受体中益生菌使用与巨细胞病毒血症发生之间的显著关联。为了更好地确定益生菌对免疫功能低下患者的安全性和有效性,需要大规模的前瞻性研究来建立全面的证据。