Mental Healthcare Utilization Among US Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the 2020-2021 National Health Interview Survey.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-24-00002
Oliver T Nguyen, Lisa J Merlo, Kea Turner, Young-Rock Hong, Amir Alishahi Tabriz, Karim Hanna, Katherine A Meese
{"title":"Mental Healthcare Utilization Among US Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the 2020-2021 National Health Interview Survey.","authors":"Oliver T Nguyen, Lisa J Merlo, Kea Turner, Young-Rock Hong, Amir Alishahi Tabriz, Karim Hanna, Katherine A Meese","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-24-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Despite the well-documented mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCWs), the literature holds limited research on their use of mental healthcare. This study assessed the prevalence and correlates of mental healthcare utilization among US HCWs, which can be used as baseline measurements to guide the evaluation of interventions and guide the development of those interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the 2020-2021 US National Health Interview Survey and restricted our analytic sample to respondents who worked in healthcare settings and reported daily, weekly, or monthly mental health symptoms (unweighted n = 1,412). Our outcome variables were: (1) receiving anxiolytic or antidepressant prescriptions, (2) receiving psychotherapy, and (3) not utilizing either treatment. We conducted multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with each outcome. Based on Andersen's behavioral model, we included predisposing factors (e.g., gender, healthcare role), enabling factors (e.g., social support, telehealth use), need factors (e.g., frequency of depressive or anxiety symptoms), and year.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>We found that 32.1% of HCWs received prescriptions, 22.3% received psychotherapy, and 59.0% were not currently using mental healthcare. Overall, some predisposing, enabling, and need factors were associated with all three outcome variables for mental healthcare utilization among HCWs. For instance, when examining the odds of not reporting current use of mental healthcare services, odds were higher among HCWs who were non-Hispanic Black/African American (odds ratio [OR] = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.16-3.12]), or Hispanic (OR = 2.68, 95% CI [1.63-4.39]) compared to those who were non-Hispanic White. Higher odds were also observed among HCWs who reported rarely or never received adequate social support (OR = 1.94, 95% CI [1.04-3.62]) as compared to those who reported always receiving adequate social support, those who were male (OR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.00-2.16]), and those without a usual source of care (OR = 2.08, 95% CI [1.12-3.88]). Inversely, lower odds were observed among HCWs who reported themselves as not heterosexual (OR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.34-0.99]) and those who had used telehealth appointments (OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.24-0.44]). Lower odds were also observed among HCWs with more frequent anxiety symptoms: monthly (OR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.20-0.88]), weekly (OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.18-0.73]), or daily frequency (OR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.14-0.55]), compared to never or few times a year. A similar pattern was observed among HCWs with more frequent depressive symptoms: monthly (OR = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22-0.49]), weekly (OR = 0.15, 95% CI [0.09-0.24]), or daily (OR = 0.11, 95% CI [0.05-0.21]), compared to never or few times a year. No differences in any outcome variable by type of HCW (diagnosing vs. nondiagnosing roles) were observed.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Our findings reveal a potential pattern of underutilization of mental health services among HCWs with mental health symptoms. To inform intervention design and delivery, additional research is needed to identify barriers to mental healthcare and preferences for their modalities that are specific to HCWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"70 4","pages":"269-287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-24-00002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: Despite the well-documented mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCWs), the literature holds limited research on their use of mental healthcare. This study assessed the prevalence and correlates of mental healthcare utilization among US HCWs, which can be used as baseline measurements to guide the evaluation of interventions and guide the development of those interventions.

Methods: We used the 2020-2021 US National Health Interview Survey and restricted our analytic sample to respondents who worked in healthcare settings and reported daily, weekly, or monthly mental health symptoms (unweighted n = 1,412). Our outcome variables were: (1) receiving anxiolytic or antidepressant prescriptions, (2) receiving psychotherapy, and (3) not utilizing either treatment. We conducted multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with each outcome. Based on Andersen's behavioral model, we included predisposing factors (e.g., gender, healthcare role), enabling factors (e.g., social support, telehealth use), need factors (e.g., frequency of depressive or anxiety symptoms), and year.

Principal findings: We found that 32.1% of HCWs received prescriptions, 22.3% received psychotherapy, and 59.0% were not currently using mental healthcare. Overall, some predisposing, enabling, and need factors were associated with all three outcome variables for mental healthcare utilization among HCWs. For instance, when examining the odds of not reporting current use of mental healthcare services, odds were higher among HCWs who were non-Hispanic Black/African American (odds ratio [OR] = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.16-3.12]), or Hispanic (OR = 2.68, 95% CI [1.63-4.39]) compared to those who were non-Hispanic White. Higher odds were also observed among HCWs who reported rarely or never received adequate social support (OR = 1.94, 95% CI [1.04-3.62]) as compared to those who reported always receiving adequate social support, those who were male (OR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.00-2.16]), and those without a usual source of care (OR = 2.08, 95% CI [1.12-3.88]). Inversely, lower odds were observed among HCWs who reported themselves as not heterosexual (OR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.34-0.99]) and those who had used telehealth appointments (OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.24-0.44]). Lower odds were also observed among HCWs with more frequent anxiety symptoms: monthly (OR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.20-0.88]), weekly (OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.18-0.73]), or daily frequency (OR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.14-0.55]), compared to never or few times a year. A similar pattern was observed among HCWs with more frequent depressive symptoms: monthly (OR = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22-0.49]), weekly (OR = 0.15, 95% CI [0.09-0.24]), or daily (OR = 0.11, 95% CI [0.05-0.21]), compared to never or few times a year. No differences in any outcome variable by type of HCW (diagnosing vs. nondiagnosing roles) were observed.

Practical applications: Our findings reveal a potential pattern of underutilization of mental health services among HCWs with mental health symptoms. To inform intervention design and delivery, additional research is needed to identify barriers to mental healthcare and preferences for their modalities that are specific to HCWs.

COVID-19大流行期间美国医护人员的精神卫生保健利用:来自2020-2021年全国健康访谈调查的证据
目标:尽管COVID-19大流行对卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的心理健康影响有充分的记录,但文献对他们使用心理保健的研究有限。本研究评估了美国卫生保健工作者精神卫生保健利用的患病率及其相关因素,可作为指导干预措施评估和指导这些干预措施发展的基线测量。方法:我们使用2020-2021年美国全国健康访谈调查,并将分析样本限制为在医疗机构工作并每天、每周或每月报告精神健康症状的受访者(未加权n = 1,412)。我们的结局变量是:(1)接受抗焦虑药或抗抑郁药处方,(2)接受心理治疗,(3)不使用任何一种治疗。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定与每个结果相关的因素。基于Andersen的行为模型,我们纳入了易感因素(例如,性别、保健角色)、使能因素(例如,社会支持、远程医疗使用)、需求因素(例如,抑郁或焦虑症状的频率)和年份。主要发现:我们发现32.1%的卫生保健工作者接受处方,22.3%接受心理治疗,59.0%目前没有使用精神保健。总体而言,一些易感因素、使能因素和需求因素与医护人员精神卫生保健利用的所有三个结果变量相关。例如,当检查未报告当前使用精神卫生保健服务的几率时,与非西班牙裔白人相比,非西班牙裔黑人/非洲裔美国人(比值比[OR] = 1.90, 95%可信区间[CI][1.16-3.12])或西班牙裔(OR = 2.68, 95% CI[1.63-4.39])的卫生保健人员的几率更高。报告很少或从未获得足够社会支持的卫生保健人员(or = 1.94, 95% CI[1.04-3.62])与报告总是获得足够社会支持的卫生保健人员、男性卫生保健人员(or = 1.47, 95% CI[1.00-2.16])和没有常规护理来源的卫生保健人员(or = 2.08, 95% CI[1.12-3.88])相比,也观察到更高的几率。相反,报告自己不是异性恋的医护人员(OR = 0.58, 95% CI[0.34-0.99])和使用远程医疗预约的医护人员(OR = 0.32, 95% CI[0.24-0.44])的患病几率较低。在焦虑症状更频繁的医护人员中也观察到较低的发生率:每月(OR = 0.42, 95% CI[0.20-0.88])、每周(OR = 0.36, 95% CI[0.18-0.73])或每日频率(OR = 0.27, 95% CI[0.14-0.55]),而一年从不或几次。在抑郁症状更频繁的医护人员中也观察到类似的模式:每月(OR = 0.33, 95% CI[0.22-0.49]),每周(OR = 0.15, 95% CI[0.09-0.24]),或每天(OR = 0.11, 95% CI[0.05-0.21]),而一年从不或几次。不同HCW类型的任何结果变量(诊断作用与非诊断作用)均无差异。实际应用:我们的研究结果揭示了有精神健康症状的卫生保健工作者对精神卫生服务利用不足的潜在模式。为了为干预措施的设计和实施提供信息,需要进行更多的研究,以确定精神卫生保健的障碍以及卫生保健工作者对其特定模式的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信