Caregiver and Pediatric Clinician Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence for Language Services.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Gabriella Ficerai-Garland, Peyton Groves, Elena A Puccio, Sabrina Bruno, Henry Hoffman, Nadia Pineda Villegas, María Cecilia Q Dancisin, Alisa Khan, K Casey Lion, Diego Chaves-Gnecco, Mona Diab, Maya I Ragavan
{"title":"Caregiver and Pediatric Clinician Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence for Language Services.","authors":"Gabriella Ficerai-Garland, Peyton Groves, Elena A Puccio, Sabrina Bruno, Henry Hoffman, Nadia Pineda Villegas, María Cecilia Q Dancisin, Alisa Khan, K Casey Lion, Diego Chaves-Gnecco, Mona Diab, Maya I Ragavan","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children and caregivers who use languages other than English (LOE) for pediatric healthcare experience inequities and poorer overall health. Advancement of large language models has raised questions about future use of artificial intelligence (AI) for language access. This study explored perspectives of caregivers who use LOE and pediatric clinicians on using AI to address unmet needs in healthcare translation and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with caregivers of pediatric patients who use LOE and pediatric clinicians about the use of AI language technologies in healthcare. A phone interpreter or fluent team member was used for LOE interviews. Recordings were transcribed, translated as needed, coded, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 caregivers using 11 different LOE and 22 clinicians participated. Themes were consistent across participants, though clinicians were more familiar with the concept of AI. Participants reported use of technologies (e.g., Google Translate) for written communication and situations where verbal interpretation was perceived to be inadequate. They were concerned about AI accuracy, privacy, and loss of empathy, but hoped it could provide real-time document translation and more convenient verbal communication. Ease of use, validation, and equitable creation and access were critical for use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers and clinicians were open to using AI to fill gaps in translation and interpretation; however, robust validation of AI technology and complementary use with human interpreters and translators is needed. Future research, practice, and policy should focus on integrating AI while investing in human translation and interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.102887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children and caregivers who use languages other than English (LOE) for pediatric healthcare experience inequities and poorer overall health. Advancement of large language models has raised questions about future use of artificial intelligence (AI) for language access. This study explored perspectives of caregivers who use LOE and pediatric clinicians on using AI to address unmet needs in healthcare translation and interpretation.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with caregivers of pediatric patients who use LOE and pediatric clinicians about the use of AI language technologies in healthcare. A phone interpreter or fluent team member was used for LOE interviews. Recordings were transcribed, translated as needed, coded, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: 20 caregivers using 11 different LOE and 22 clinicians participated. Themes were consistent across participants, though clinicians were more familiar with the concept of AI. Participants reported use of technologies (e.g., Google Translate) for written communication and situations where verbal interpretation was perceived to be inadequate. They were concerned about AI accuracy, privacy, and loss of empathy, but hoped it could provide real-time document translation and more convenient verbal communication. Ease of use, validation, and equitable creation and access were critical for use.

Conclusions: Caregivers and clinicians were open to using AI to fill gaps in translation and interpretation; however, robust validation of AI technology and complementary use with human interpreters and translators is needed. Future research, practice, and policy should focus on integrating AI while investing in human translation and interpretation.

护理人员和儿科临床医生对语言服务人工智能的看法。
目的:使用非英语语言(LOE)的儿童和护理人员在儿科医疗保健方面经历不公平和整体健康状况较差。大型语言模型的进步引发了人们对未来使用人工智能(AI)进行语言访问的质疑。本研究探讨了使用LOE的护理人员和儿科临床医生使用人工智能解决医疗翻译和口译中未满足需求的观点。方法:我们对使用LOE的儿科患者的护理人员和儿科临床医生进行了半结构化的个人访谈,讨论了人工智能语言技术在医疗保健中的使用。电话口译员或流利的团队成员被用于LOE访谈。录音被转录,根据需要翻译,编码,并使用归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:20名护理人员和22名临床医生参与了11种不同的LOE。尽管临床医生更熟悉人工智能的概念,但参与者的主题是一致的。与会者报告了书面交流和口头翻译被认为不够的情况下使用技术(例如谷歌翻译)的情况。他们担心人工智能的准确性、隐私性和移情能力的丧失,但希望它能提供实时文档翻译和更方便的口头交流。易用性、有效性以及公平的创建和访问对使用至关重要。结论:护理人员和临床医生愿意使用人工智能来填补翻译和口译方面的空白;然而,需要对人工智能技术进行强有力的验证,并与人工口译和笔译员互补使用。未来的研究、实践和政策应侧重于整合人工智能,同时投资于人工翻译和口译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信