Factors associated with in-hospital amputation after revascularization for lower extremity trauma.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1177/17085381251360074
Vy Thuy Ho, Shernaz Sophia Dossabhoy, Lakshika Tennakoon, Jason Tin Aye Lee, Lisa Marie Knowlton
{"title":"Factors associated with in-hospital amputation after revascularization for lower extremity trauma.","authors":"Vy Thuy Ho, Shernaz Sophia Dossabhoy, Lakshika Tennakoon, Jason Tin Aye Lee, Lisa Marie Knowlton","doi":"10.1177/17085381251360074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesWhile concomitant vascular injury is associated with an increased risk of amputation following lower extremity trauma, risk factors for amputation after attempted revascularization are lesser known. In centers where dedicated vascular traumatic expertise is not available, a lack of guidance regarding high-risk vascular trauma may limit efforts to appropriately triage and transfer patients to a higher level of care. We identified factors associated with in-hospital amputation after revascularization for isolated lower extremity trauma.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) is a multicenter, prospectively maintained database containing deidentified traumatic admissions data for over 900 trauma centers in the United States. From 2017 to 2021, ACS TQIP was queried for adult patients undergoing arterial revascularization following isolated lower extremity trauma. Injury-related variables were derived from structured data fields, Injury Severity Scores, and Abbreviated Injury Scores. The primary endpoint was post-revascularization in-hospital lower extremity amputation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression of demographic data, medical history, and injury-related variables were performed to identify factors associated with post-revascularization amputation.ResultsOf 5669 patients undergoing revascularization, 10.2% underwent amputation a median 8.31 days after their surgical procedure. Most revascularizations were done via open surgical approach (81.9%), followed by endovascular (13.8%) and hybrid (4.3%) methods. Amputated patients were older (39.5 vs 35.6 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001, Table 1) and more likely to have a preoperative history of peripheral arterial disease (1.4% vs 0.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.017). On multivariate logistic regression, blunt mechanism (OR 4.80, <i>p</i> < 0.001, Table 2), popliteal arterial injury (OR 2.11, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and concurrent bony injury (OR 2.03, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independently associated with amputation.ConclusionsIn the multicenter American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program, the overall rate of post-revascularization amputation in patients with isolated lower extremity trauma was 10.20%. Amputation risk was higher in patients with advanced age and comorbidity, suggesting that triage for revascularization already incorporates an evaluation of patient frailty. In multivariate analysis, blunt mechanism of injury, popliteal artery injury, and bony injury were independently associated with amputation. Each additional hour between admission and revascularization was associated with greater amputation risk, highlighting the importance of efforts to expediently and appropriately triage patients at with high-risk injuries to optimize limb salvage outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381251360074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251360074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesWhile concomitant vascular injury is associated with an increased risk of amputation following lower extremity trauma, risk factors for amputation after attempted revascularization are lesser known. In centers where dedicated vascular traumatic expertise is not available, a lack of guidance regarding high-risk vascular trauma may limit efforts to appropriately triage and transfer patients to a higher level of care. We identified factors associated with in-hospital amputation after revascularization for isolated lower extremity trauma.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) is a multicenter, prospectively maintained database containing deidentified traumatic admissions data for over 900 trauma centers in the United States. From 2017 to 2021, ACS TQIP was queried for adult patients undergoing arterial revascularization following isolated lower extremity trauma. Injury-related variables were derived from structured data fields, Injury Severity Scores, and Abbreviated Injury Scores. The primary endpoint was post-revascularization in-hospital lower extremity amputation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression of demographic data, medical history, and injury-related variables were performed to identify factors associated with post-revascularization amputation.ResultsOf 5669 patients undergoing revascularization, 10.2% underwent amputation a median 8.31 days after their surgical procedure. Most revascularizations were done via open surgical approach (81.9%), followed by endovascular (13.8%) and hybrid (4.3%) methods. Amputated patients were older (39.5 vs 35.6 years, p < 0.001, Table 1) and more likely to have a preoperative history of peripheral arterial disease (1.4% vs 0.6%, p = 0.017). On multivariate logistic regression, blunt mechanism (OR 4.80, p < 0.001, Table 2), popliteal arterial injury (OR 2.11, p < 0.001), and concurrent bony injury (OR 2.03, p < 0.001) were independently associated with amputation.ConclusionsIn the multicenter American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program, the overall rate of post-revascularization amputation in patients with isolated lower extremity trauma was 10.20%. Amputation risk was higher in patients with advanced age and comorbidity, suggesting that triage for revascularization already incorporates an evaluation of patient frailty. In multivariate analysis, blunt mechanism of injury, popliteal artery injury, and bony injury were independently associated with amputation. Each additional hour between admission and revascularization was associated with greater amputation risk, highlighting the importance of efforts to expediently and appropriately triage patients at with high-risk injuries to optimize limb salvage outcomes.

下肢外伤血运重建术后住院截肢的相关因素
虽然伴随血管损伤与下肢外伤后截肢的风险增加有关,但尝试血运重建术后截肢的危险因素尚不清楚。在没有专门的血管创伤专业知识的中心,缺乏关于高风险血管创伤的指导可能会限制适当的分诊和将患者转移到更高水平的护理。我们确定了与孤立性下肢创伤血运重建术后住院截肢相关的因素。方法美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划(ACS TQIP)是一个多中心、前瞻性维护的数据库,包含美国900多个创伤中心的未识别创伤入院数据。2017年至2021年,对孤立性下肢外伤后行动脉血运重建术的成年患者进行ACS TQIP查询。损伤相关变量来源于结构化数据字段、损伤严重评分和简略损伤评分。主要终点是院内下肢截肢血运重建术后。对人口统计数据、病史和损伤相关变量进行单因素和多因素logistic回归,以确定与血运重建后截肢相关的因素。结果5669例接受血运重建术的患者中,10.2%的患者在手术后8.31天内截肢。大多数血管重建是通过开放手术(81.9%)进行的,其次是血管内(13.8%)和混合(4.3%)方法。截肢患者年龄较大(39.5岁vs 35.6岁,p < 0.001,表1),术前有外周动脉疾病史的可能性较大(1.4% vs 0.6%, p = 0.017)。多因素logistic回归显示,钝性机制(OR 4.80, p < 0.001,表2)、腘动脉损伤(OR 2.11, p < 0.001)和并发骨损伤(OR 2.03, p < 0.001)与截肢独立相关。结论在多中心美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善项目中,孤立性下肢创伤患者血运重建后截肢的总体发生率为10.20%。高龄和合并症患者的截肢风险更高,这表明对血运重建的分诊已经纳入了对患者虚弱程度的评估。在多因素分析中,钝性损伤机制、腘动脉损伤和骨损伤与截肢独立相关。入院和血运重建之间每增加一个小时,截肢风险就会增加,这就强调了对高风险损伤患者进行快速和适当的分诊以优化肢体保留结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信