Continuity of care in the context of a primary health care reform: a follow-up after the Swedish Patient Choice Reform.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hannes Kohnke, Andrzej Zielinski, Anders Beckman, Henrik Ohlsson
{"title":"Continuity of care in the context of a primary health care reform: a follow-up after the Swedish <i>Patient Choice Reform</i>.","authors":"Hannes Kohnke, Andrzej Zielinski, Anders Beckman, Henrik Ohlsson","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2527856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuity of care (CoC) is essential for effective primary health care (PHC), yet Swedish PHC has historically exhibited low levels of continuity. The Swedish <i>Patient Choice Reform</i> introduced privatization and market-oriented principles into PHC, leading to increased utilization and growing inequities in service use driven by socioeconomic disparities and misalignment with health care needs. However, little is known about its impact on continuity. The aim of this study is to explore long-term effects of longitudinal CoC in PHC within the context of the <i>Patient Choice Reform</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using register data from Region Skåne (2007-2017), we created three closed cohorts, each capturing three years of PHC utilization. Continuity with GPs was measured using the Continuity of Care Index (CoCI). Quantile regression assessed associations between continuity and individual characteristics, including age, sex, income, education and residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 322,641 individuals with 7,878,642 general practitioner (GP) visits, median CoCI declined from 0.17 (2007 cohort) to 0.13 (2015 cohort). Higher age, male sex and increased PHC utilization were linked to greater continuity in 2007, but these associations weakened by 2015.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuity of care in Swedish PHC declined over time, particularly among older individuals and frequent PHC users. These findings highlight the need to address continuity deterioration in the context of the <i>Patient Choice Reform</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2527856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuity of care (CoC) is essential for effective primary health care (PHC), yet Swedish PHC has historically exhibited low levels of continuity. The Swedish Patient Choice Reform introduced privatization and market-oriented principles into PHC, leading to increased utilization and growing inequities in service use driven by socioeconomic disparities and misalignment with health care needs. However, little is known about its impact on continuity. The aim of this study is to explore long-term effects of longitudinal CoC in PHC within the context of the Patient Choice Reform.

Methods: Using register data from Region Skåne (2007-2017), we created three closed cohorts, each capturing three years of PHC utilization. Continuity with GPs was measured using the Continuity of Care Index (CoCI). Quantile regression assessed associations between continuity and individual characteristics, including age, sex, income, education and residence.

Results: Among 322,641 individuals with 7,878,642 general practitioner (GP) visits, median CoCI declined from 0.17 (2007 cohort) to 0.13 (2015 cohort). Higher age, male sex and increased PHC utilization were linked to greater continuity in 2007, but these associations weakened by 2015.

Conclusions: Continuity of care in Swedish PHC declined over time, particularly among older individuals and frequent PHC users. These findings highlight the need to address continuity deterioration in the context of the Patient Choice Reform.

初级卫生保健改革背景下的护理连续性:瑞典患者选择改革后的后续行动。
背景:护理连续性(CoC)对于有效的初级卫生保健(PHC)至关重要,但瑞典初级卫生保健历史上表现出低水平的连续性。瑞典患者选择改革将私有化和市场导向原则引入初级保健,导致社会经济差异和与保健需求不一致导致服务利用率增加和服务使用不公平现象加剧。然而,人们对其对连续性的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨在患者选择改革的背景下,纵向CoC在初级保健中的长期影响。方法:使用区域sk(2007-2017)的登记数据,我们创建了三个封闭队列,每个队列捕获三年的初级保健使用情况。使用护理连续性指数(CoCI)测量与全科医生的连续性。分位数回归评估了连续性与个人特征(包括年龄、性别、收入、教育程度和居住地)之间的关联。结果:在322,641名个体和7,878,642名全科医生(GP)就诊中,CoCI中位数从0.17(2007队列)下降到0.13(2015队列)。2007年,较高的年龄、男性和PHC使用率增加与更大的连续性相关,但这些关联到2015年减弱。结论:瑞典PHC的护理连续性随着时间的推移而下降,特别是在老年人和频繁的PHC使用者中。这些发现强调了在患者选择改革的背景下解决连续性恶化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信