Serial Trauma Abdominal Ultrasound in Children (STAUNCH): Assessment of Utilization.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Benjamin K Nti, Pamela Soriano, Sean Thompson
{"title":"Serial Trauma Abdominal Ultrasound in Children (STAUNCH): Assessment of Utilization.","authors":"Benjamin K Nti, Pamela Soriano, Sean Thompson","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound has established utility within pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and has the added benefit of avoiding excessive radiation exposure. The serial Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (sFAST) examination is an underutilized tool in pediatric trauma patients. We sought to understand current practices and viewpoints regarding serial ultrasound (US) examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three PEM institutions were surveyed regarding attitudes and practices toward serial FAST examination. We included all faculty and staff who had oversight or leadership in a POCUS program. We were provided with basic demographic data from institutions through our survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among institutions that performed serial FAST examinations, the region with the highest number of respondents was the Northeast (38.7%). In total, 75.8% of respondents noted that serial ultrasound was a useful tool in pediatric trauma. The most common barrier was insufficient evidence for efficacy (50%), with the perception that it infrequently changed management (78.9%). Serial FAST was not routinely performed, and only one institution had a protocol for it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is institutional support for serial FAST examinations as part of trauma evaluations, several barriers remain that hinder their routine use in pediatric trauma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound has established utility within pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and has the added benefit of avoiding excessive radiation exposure. The serial Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (sFAST) examination is an underutilized tool in pediatric trauma patients. We sought to understand current practices and viewpoints regarding serial ultrasound (US) examinations.

Methods: Thirty-three PEM institutions were surveyed regarding attitudes and practices toward serial FAST examination. We included all faculty and staff who had oversight or leadership in a POCUS program. We were provided with basic demographic data from institutions through our survey.

Results: Among institutions that performed serial FAST examinations, the region with the highest number of respondents was the Northeast (38.7%). In total, 75.8% of respondents noted that serial ultrasound was a useful tool in pediatric trauma. The most common barrier was insufficient evidence for efficacy (50%), with the perception that it infrequently changed management (78.9%). Serial FAST was not routinely performed, and only one institution had a protocol for it.

Conclusions: Although there is institutional support for serial FAST examinations as part of trauma evaluations, several barriers remain that hinder their routine use in pediatric trauma patients.

儿童系列创伤腹部超声:评估应用。
目的:点护理超声在儿科急诊医学(PEM)中已经建立了效用,并且具有避免过度辐射暴露的附加好处。系列创伤超声集中评估(sFAST)检查是儿科创伤患者未充分利用的工具。我们试图了解目前关于连续超声检查的做法和观点。方法:调查33家PEM机构对连续FAST检查的态度和做法。我们包括了所有在POCUS项目中有监督或领导作用的教职员工。通过调查,我们从各机构获得了基本的人口统计数据。结果:在开展系列FAST检查的机构中,回答人数最多的地区为东北地区(38.7%)。总的来说,75.8%的受访者指出,连续超声是儿科创伤的有用工具。最常见的障碍是有效性证据不足(50%),人们认为不经常更换管理(78.9%)。串行FAST不是常规执行的,只有一个机构有它的协议。结论:尽管有机构支持将连续快速检查作为创伤评估的一部分,但仍有一些障碍阻碍其在儿科创伤患者中的常规应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信