Gautier Chene, Laura Miquel, Aubert Agostini, Sofiane Bendifallah, Céline Solignac, Bernadette Darne, Solène Languille, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Marie Carbonnel
{"title":"Safety of in-bag morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gautier Chene, Laura Miquel, Aubert Agostini, Sofiane Bendifallah, Céline Solignac, Bernadette Darne, Solène Languille, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Marie Carbonnel","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the outcomes of in-bag versus no-bag morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy, focusing on safety.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Searches were conducted in Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed, covering studies from inception up to January 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Inclusion of studies on females undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy and/or hysterectomy with in-bag morcellation, excluding series with fewer than 10 patients.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration and results: </strong>Data were synthesized using meta-analysis techniques, with sensitivity analyses for rare events, focusing on intraoperative complications (i.e. a composite outcome including conversion to laparotomy, bowel injury or, accidental injury to any viscus injury or vessel). The secondary outcomes include presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium/uterus, blood transfusion, bleeding > 500mL, total operative time, postoperative length of stay, postoperative pain, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications and cost. From 1,970 published studies, we included 20 trials, enrolling 5,505 women in the in-bag and 37,283 women in the no-bag group. We included 9 trials in each subgroup: myomectomy and hysterectomy, enrolling 767 and 4678 women in the in-bag; 830 and 36380 women in the no-bag groups, respectively. We observed increased intraoperative complications compared to no-bag morcellation (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11;1.89) with a null heterogeneity (I²= 0%). The hysterectomy subgroup analysis showed a significant association between bag and intraoperative complications (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12;1.93) but not myomectomy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.29;3.43). We did not have enough information to conclude about the presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium and costs. No statistical differences were observed concerning the other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of containment bags in morcellation may increase the risk of intra-operative complications, particularly in case of hysterectomy. However, these events might not be directly related to bag use and could represent confounding factors. Further studies are needed to investigate in-bag morcellation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42023478908 on the International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews. Registered November 19, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the outcomes of in-bag versus no-bag morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy, focusing on safety.
Data sources: Searches were conducted in Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed, covering studies from inception up to January 31, 2024.
Methods of study selection: Inclusion of studies on females undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy and/or hysterectomy with in-bag morcellation, excluding series with fewer than 10 patients.
Tabulation, integration and results: Data were synthesized using meta-analysis techniques, with sensitivity analyses for rare events, focusing on intraoperative complications (i.e. a composite outcome including conversion to laparotomy, bowel injury or, accidental injury to any viscus injury or vessel). The secondary outcomes include presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium/uterus, blood transfusion, bleeding > 500mL, total operative time, postoperative length of stay, postoperative pain, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications and cost. From 1,970 published studies, we included 20 trials, enrolling 5,505 women in the in-bag and 37,283 women in the no-bag group. We included 9 trials in each subgroup: myomectomy and hysterectomy, enrolling 767 and 4678 women in the in-bag; 830 and 36380 women in the no-bag groups, respectively. We observed increased intraoperative complications compared to no-bag morcellation (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11;1.89) with a null heterogeneity (I²= 0%). The hysterectomy subgroup analysis showed a significant association between bag and intraoperative complications (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12;1.93) but not myomectomy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.29;3.43). We did not have enough information to conclude about the presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium and costs. No statistical differences were observed concerning the other secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: The use of containment bags in morcellation may increase the risk of intra-operative complications, particularly in case of hysterectomy. However, these events might not be directly related to bag use and could represent confounding factors. Further studies are needed to investigate in-bag morcellation.
Registration: CRD42023478908 on the International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews. Registered November 19, 2024.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.