Safety of in-bag morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gautier Chene, Laura Miquel, Aubert Agostini, Sofiane Bendifallah, Céline Solignac, Bernadette Darne, Solène Languille, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Marie Carbonnel
{"title":"Safety of in-bag morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gautier Chene, Laura Miquel, Aubert Agostini, Sofiane Bendifallah, Céline Solignac, Bernadette Darne, Solène Languille, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Marie Carbonnel","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the outcomes of in-bag versus no-bag morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy, focusing on safety.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Searches were conducted in Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed, covering studies from inception up to January 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Inclusion of studies on females undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy and/or hysterectomy with in-bag morcellation, excluding series with fewer than 10 patients.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration and results: </strong>Data were synthesized using meta-analysis techniques, with sensitivity analyses for rare events, focusing on intraoperative complications (i.e. a composite outcome including conversion to laparotomy, bowel injury or, accidental injury to any viscus injury or vessel). The secondary outcomes include presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium/uterus, blood transfusion, bleeding > 500mL, total operative time, postoperative length of stay, postoperative pain, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications and cost. From 1,970 published studies, we included 20 trials, enrolling 5,505 women in the in-bag and 37,283 women in the no-bag group. We included 9 trials in each subgroup: myomectomy and hysterectomy, enrolling 767 and 4678 women in the in-bag; 830 and 36380 women in the no-bag groups, respectively. We observed increased intraoperative complications compared to no-bag morcellation (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11;1.89) with a null heterogeneity (I²= 0%). The hysterectomy subgroup analysis showed a significant association between bag and intraoperative complications (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12;1.93) but not myomectomy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.29;3.43). We did not have enough information to conclude about the presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium and costs. No statistical differences were observed concerning the other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of containment bags in morcellation may increase the risk of intra-operative complications, particularly in case of hysterectomy. However, these events might not be directly related to bag use and could represent confounding factors. Further studies are needed to investigate in-bag morcellation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42023478908 on the International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews. Registered November 19, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the outcomes of in-bag versus no-bag morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy, focusing on safety.

Data sources: Searches were conducted in Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed, covering studies from inception up to January 31, 2024.

Methods of study selection: Inclusion of studies on females undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy and/or hysterectomy with in-bag morcellation, excluding series with fewer than 10 patients.

Tabulation, integration and results: Data were synthesized using meta-analysis techniques, with sensitivity analyses for rare events, focusing on intraoperative complications (i.e. a composite outcome including conversion to laparotomy, bowel injury or, accidental injury to any viscus injury or vessel). The secondary outcomes include presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium/uterus, blood transfusion, bleeding > 500mL, total operative time, postoperative length of stay, postoperative pain, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications and cost. From 1,970 published studies, we included 20 trials, enrolling 5,505 women in the in-bag and 37,283 women in the no-bag group. We included 9 trials in each subgroup: myomectomy and hysterectomy, enrolling 767 and 4678 women in the in-bag; 830 and 36380 women in the no-bag groups, respectively. We observed increased intraoperative complications compared to no-bag morcellation (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11;1.89) with a null heterogeneity (I²= 0%). The hysterectomy subgroup analysis showed a significant association between bag and intraoperative complications (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12;1.93) but not myomectomy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.29;3.43). We did not have enough information to conclude about the presence of parasitic fibroma, fragment of myometrium and costs. No statistical differences were observed concerning the other secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: The use of containment bags in morcellation may increase the risk of intra-operative complications, particularly in case of hysterectomy. However, these events might not be directly related to bag use and could represent confounding factors. Further studies are needed to investigate in-bag morcellation.

Registration: CRD42023478908 on the International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews. Registered November 19, 2024.

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫切除术中袋内碎切术的安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:系统评价腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫切除术中袋式分块术与无袋式分块术的效果,重点评价其安全性。数据来源:检索Cochrane Library, Embase和PubMed,涵盖了从成立到2024年1月31日的研究。研究选择方法:纳入接受腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和/或子宫切除术合并袋内碎裂的女性研究,排除少于10例患者的研究。制表、整合和结果:使用荟萃分析技术对数据进行综合,并对罕见事件进行敏感性分析,重点关注术中并发症(即复合结果,包括转开腹手术、肠损伤或任何内脏损伤或血管意外损伤)。次要结局包括是否存在寄生纤维瘤、子宫肌层/子宫碎片、输血、出血> 500mL、总手术时间、术后住院时间、术后疼痛、转开腹、术后并发症和费用。从1970项已发表的研究中,我们纳入了20项试验,招募了5505名有包组的女性和37283名无包组的女性。我们在每个亚组中纳入了9个试验:子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫切除术,纳入了767和4678名妇女;无袋组分别有830名和36380名女性。我们观察到,与无袋粉碎术相比,术中并发症增加(OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11;1.89),无异质性(I²= 0%)。子宫切除术亚组分析显示,子宫袋与术中并发症有显著相关性(OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12;1.93),而子宫肌瘤切除术与此无关(OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.29;3.43)。我们没有足够的信息来得出寄生纤维瘤、肌层碎片和费用的结论。其他次要结局无统计学差异。结论:在分块术中使用收容袋可能会增加术中并发症的风险,特别是在子宫切除术的情况下。然而,这些事件可能与塑料袋的使用没有直接关系,可能是混杂因素。需要进一步的研究来调查袋内碎化。注册:CRD42023478908在国际前瞻性系统评价注册。注册于2024年11月19日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信