Toripalimab in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Mostafa A Khalifa, Marafi Jammaa Ahmed, Hashim Talib Hashim, Aya Ahmed Shimal, Ahmad Omar Saleh, Salma Allam, Elian Khalafalla Awadalla, Hadeel Basheer Bin Saud, Jubran Khaled Alzedaar, Ali Dway, Roaa Abdultawab, Asala Hussein Al-Hadrawi, Mohammedbaqer Ghuraibawi
{"title":"Toripalimab in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mostafa A Khalifa, Marafi Jammaa Ahmed, Hashim Talib Hashim, Aya Ahmed Shimal, Ahmad Omar Saleh, Salma Allam, Elian Khalafalla Awadalla, Hadeel Basheer Bin Saud, Jubran Khaled Alzedaar, Ali Dway, Roaa Abdultawab, Asala Hussein Al-Hadrawi, Mohammedbaqer Ghuraibawi","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01263-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis despite advancements in treatment. Toripalimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has demonstrated the potential to improve clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the efficacy and safety of Toripalimab in EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar up to January 2025. Eligible studies evaluated Toripalimab in esophageal cancer, including randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), while safety outcomes assessed treatment-related adverse events. Data were synthesized using random-effects models, with heterogeneity evaluated via Cochrane's Q and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled analysis included six studies involving 678 patients. Toripalimab demonstrated promising efficacy, with a Complete Response (CR) rate of 33%, Partial Response (PR) rate of 36%, pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 30%, and major pathological response (MPR) rate of 46%. The R0 resection rate was 87%, while OS and PFS rates were reported at 78% and 50%, respectively. Anemia (56%), alopecia (54%), leukopenia (54%), and fatigue (30%) were the most frequently reported adverse effects. Other common adverse effects included nausea (29%), constipation (18%), and vomiting (20%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Toripalimab demonstrates significant potential in treating esophageal cancer, with favorable response rates and survival outcomes. However, the high incidence of adverse effects highlights the need for supportive care and ongoing research. While based on limited sample sizes and single-arm studies that may introduce bias and affect generalizability in this review, we provide valuable preliminary insights into toripalimab's potential, highlighting the need for larger randomized trials to build on these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01263-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis despite advancements in treatment. Toripalimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has demonstrated the potential to improve clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the efficacy and safety of Toripalimab in EC.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar up to January 2025. Eligible studies evaluated Toripalimab in esophageal cancer, including randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), while safety outcomes assessed treatment-related adverse events. Data were synthesized using random-effects models, with heterogeneity evaluated via Cochrane's Q and I2 statistics.

Results: The pooled analysis included six studies involving 678 patients. Toripalimab demonstrated promising efficacy, with a Complete Response (CR) rate of 33%, Partial Response (PR) rate of 36%, pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 30%, and major pathological response (MPR) rate of 46%. The R0 resection rate was 87%, while OS and PFS rates were reported at 78% and 50%, respectively. Anemia (56%), alopecia (54%), leukopenia (54%), and fatigue (30%) were the most frequently reported adverse effects. Other common adverse effects included nausea (29%), constipation (18%), and vomiting (20%).

Conclusions: Toripalimab demonstrates significant potential in treating esophageal cancer, with favorable response rates and survival outcomes. However, the high incidence of adverse effects highlights the need for supportive care and ongoing research. While based on limited sample sizes and single-arm studies that may introduce bias and affect generalizability in this review, we provide valuable preliminary insights into toripalimab's potential, highlighting the need for larger randomized trials to build on these findings.

托利帕单抗治疗食管癌:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:食管癌(EC)仍然是一种高度侵袭性的恶性肿瘤,尽管治疗取得了进展,但预后较差。torpalimab是一种PD-1抑制剂,已被证明具有改善临床结果的潜力。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了托里帕利单抗治疗EC的有效性和安全性。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、ScienceDirect和谷歌Scholar,检索截止到2025年1月。符合条件的研究评估了托利帕单抗在食管癌中的作用,包括随机对照试验和非随机对照试验。主要结局包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR),而安全性结局评估治疗相关不良事件。数据采用随机效应模型合成,并通过Cochrane的Q和I2统计量评估异质性。结果:汇总分析包括6项研究,涉及678例患者。托里帕利单抗的完全缓解率(CR)为33%,部分缓解率(PR)为36%,病理完全缓解率(pCR)为30%,主要病理缓解率(MPR)为46%。R0切除率为87%,而OS和PFS分别为78%和50%。贫血(56%)、脱发(54%)、白细胞减少(54%)和疲劳(30%)是最常见的不良反应。其他常见的不良反应包括恶心(29%)、便秘(18%)和呕吐(20%)。结论:多利帕利单抗在治疗食管癌方面具有显著的潜力,具有良好的反应率和生存结果。然而,高发生率的不良反应突出了支持性护理和持续研究的必要性。虽然基于有限的样本量和单臂研究,在本综述中可能会引入偏倚和影响可推广性,但我们对托帕利单抗的潜力提供了有价值的初步见解,强调需要更大规模的随机试验来建立这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信