Comparison of Essential Oil Extraction Techniques and Their Therapeutic Applications in Dentistry: Focus on Candida albicans Inhibition.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JEP.S521028
Katherine Cuenca-León, Jéssica María Sarmiento-Ordóñez, Edisson-Mauricio Pacheco-Quito, Samantha Miriam Benavides-Túlcan, Nicole Alejandra Castro, Aránzazu Zarzuelo-Castañeda
{"title":"Comparison of Essential Oil Extraction Techniques and Their Therapeutic Applications in Dentistry: Focus on <i>Candida albicans</i> Inhibition.","authors":"Katherine Cuenca-León, Jéssica María Sarmiento-Ordóñez, Edisson-Mauricio Pacheco-Quito, Samantha Miriam Benavides-Túlcan, Nicole Alejandra Castro, Aránzazu Zarzuelo-Castañeda","doi":"10.2147/JEP.S521028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, the efficacy of three essential oil extraction techniques steam entrainment, Soxhlet extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction (SCF) was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Determine the most effective method for obtaining bioactive compounds from <i>Cymbopogon citratus, Origanum vulgare</i>, and <i>Coriandrum sativum</i>, plant species recognized for their antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties with potential applications in dentistry. The selected plants, identified based on scientific evidence, were certified and lyophilized prior to extraction. The efficiency of each technique was assessed in terms of essential oil yield, purity, and biological activity.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The plant species were selected for their therapeutic properties based on scientific reports, certified, and lyophilized before proceeding with the different extraction methods. The efficacy of each technique was compared in terms of the purity and yield of the essential oils obtained. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was shown that FSC extraction is the method that allows obtaining essential oils with the highest purity and yield, followed by steam entrainment, with the Soxhlet method being the least efficient. However, in the microbiological analysis, the essential oil obtained by steam entrainment showed a greater inhibitory effect against <i>Candida albicans</i> ATCC 90028.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the FSC and steam entrainment techniques are the most suitable for obtaining essential oils for therapeutic applications in dentistry, since they allow better preservation of the bioactive components and reduce the environmental impact. These results position FSC and vapor entrainment extraction as promising options for the development of therapeutic products in dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":15846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"17 ","pages":"455-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S521028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this study, the efficacy of three essential oil extraction techniques steam entrainment, Soxhlet extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction (SCF) was evaluated.

Aim: Determine the most effective method for obtaining bioactive compounds from Cymbopogon citratus, Origanum vulgare, and Coriandrum sativum, plant species recognized for their antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties with potential applications in dentistry. The selected plants, identified based on scientific evidence, were certified and lyophilized prior to extraction. The efficiency of each technique was assessed in terms of essential oil yield, purity, and biological activity.

Methodology: The plant species were selected for their therapeutic properties based on scientific reports, certified, and lyophilized before proceeding with the different extraction methods. The efficacy of each technique was compared in terms of the purity and yield of the essential oils obtained. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.

Results: It was shown that FSC extraction is the method that allows obtaining essential oils with the highest purity and yield, followed by steam entrainment, with the Soxhlet method being the least efficient. However, in the microbiological analysis, the essential oil obtained by steam entrainment showed a greater inhibitory effect against Candida albicans ATCC 90028.

Conclusion: In this study, the FSC and steam entrainment techniques are the most suitable for obtaining essential oils for therapeutic applications in dentistry, since they allow better preservation of the bioactive components and reduce the environmental impact. These results position FSC and vapor entrainment extraction as promising options for the development of therapeutic products in dentistry.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

精油提取技术及其在牙科治疗中的应用比较:以抑制白色念珠菌为重点。
背景:本研究对蒸汽夹带法、索氏萃取法和超临界流体萃取法三种精油提取工艺的提取效果进行了评价。目的:确定从具有抗菌和抗炎特性的药用植物Cymbopogon citratus、Origanum vulgare和Coriandrum sativum中提取生物活性物质的最有效方法。所选择的植物,根据科学证据鉴定,在提取之前经过认证和冻干。从精油得率、纯度和生物活性方面评估了每种技术的效率。方法:根据科学报告、认证和冻干的基础上,根据其治疗特性选择植物物种,然后进行不同的提取方法。从精油的纯度和得率方面比较了每种工艺的效果。采用SPSS 25进行统计分析。结果:FSC提取法获得的精油纯度和得率最高,其次是蒸汽夹带法,索氏法效率最低。然而,在微生物学分析中,蒸汽夹持得到的精油对白色念珠菌ATCC 90028有更大的抑制作用。结论:在本研究中,FSC和蒸汽夹带技术最适合用于牙科治疗应用的精油提取,因为它们可以更好地保存生物活性成分并减少对环境的影响。这些结果表明,FSC和蒸汽夹带提取是牙科治疗产品开发的有前途的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书