Institutionalization of Health Technology Assessment of medical devices: a cluster analysis of EU, EEA, and EFTA countries.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mario Cesare Nurchis, Gian Marco Raspolini, Pietro Derrico, Carlo Favaretti, Matteo Ritrovato, Giandomenico Nollo, Gianfranco Damiani
{"title":"Institutionalization of Health Technology Assessment of medical devices: a cluster analysis of EU, EEA, and EFTA countries.","authors":"Mario Cesare Nurchis, Gian Marco Raspolini, Pietro Derrico, Carlo Favaretti, Matteo Ritrovato, Giandomenico Nollo, Gianfranco Damiani","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health technology assessment of medical devices (HTA-MDs) presents unique challenges compared to pharmaceuticals. Total MD expenditure continues to grow in Europe, and countries typically conduct their own HTA-MDs evaluations, with varying institutionalization arrangements. European Union's (EU's) HTA Regulation aims to establish collaborative clinical assessments across Member States, potentially expediting the path from EU safety certification of MDs to pricing and reimbursement decisions. This study aims to identify emergent configurations among institutionalizations of HTA-MDs in the EU, European Economic Area (EEA), and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publicly available data were cross-sectionally collected for EU, EEA, and EFTA countries until August 2024 to allow a cross-country analysis of HTA-MDs institutionalizations. Countries were included if they had at least one publicly mandated body for HTA-MDs. Data sources were scientific databases, institutional websites, and HTA bodies' documentation. A framework of 16 elements, qualitatively describing the institutionalization of HTA-MDs, was developed based on a document review and used as a dataset for agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis to identify patterns of HTA-MDs institutionalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 21 included countries formed three clusters: Cluster 1 featured regulatory-focused, legally bound HTA-MDs systems with mandatory assessments determining reimbursement decisions; Cluster 2 was characterized by regulatory functions, external expert collaboration, formal prioritization processes, and organized Horizon Scanning; Cluster 3 showed recommendatory functions, nonmandatory assessments, and limited impact on reimbursement decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HTA-MDs institutionalizations could benefit from implementing prioritization processes of evaluations, establishing networks of collaborative assessment centers, and ensuring links between evaluations and reimbursement decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Health technology assessment of medical devices (HTA-MDs) presents unique challenges compared to pharmaceuticals. Total MD expenditure continues to grow in Europe, and countries typically conduct their own HTA-MDs evaluations, with varying institutionalization arrangements. European Union's (EU's) HTA Regulation aims to establish collaborative clinical assessments across Member States, potentially expediting the path from EU safety certification of MDs to pricing and reimbursement decisions. This study aims to identify emergent configurations among institutionalizations of HTA-MDs in the EU, European Economic Area (EEA), and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries.

Methods: Publicly available data were cross-sectionally collected for EU, EEA, and EFTA countries until August 2024 to allow a cross-country analysis of HTA-MDs institutionalizations. Countries were included if they had at least one publicly mandated body for HTA-MDs. Data sources were scientific databases, institutional websites, and HTA bodies' documentation. A framework of 16 elements, qualitatively describing the institutionalization of HTA-MDs, was developed based on a document review and used as a dataset for agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis to identify patterns of HTA-MDs institutionalization.

Results: The 21 included countries formed three clusters: Cluster 1 featured regulatory-focused, legally bound HTA-MDs systems with mandatory assessments determining reimbursement decisions; Cluster 2 was characterized by regulatory functions, external expert collaboration, formal prioritization processes, and organized Horizon Scanning; Cluster 3 showed recommendatory functions, nonmandatory assessments, and limited impact on reimbursement decisions.

Conclusions: HTA-MDs institutionalizations could benefit from implementing prioritization processes of evaluations, establishing networks of collaborative assessment centers, and ensuring links between evaluations and reimbursement decisions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医疗器械卫生技术评价制度化:欧洲国家的聚类分析。
目的:与药品相比,医疗器械(HTA-MDs)的卫生技术评估提出了独特的挑战。欧洲的医疗保健总支出继续增长,各国通常进行各自的医疗保健-医疗保健评估,并作出不同的制度化安排。欧盟(EU)的HTA法规旨在在成员国之间建立协作临床评估,可能加快从欧盟对MDs的安全认证到定价和报销决策的路径。本研究旨在确定欧盟、欧洲经济区(EEA)和欧洲自由贸易联盟(EFTA)国家hta - md制度化中的紧急配置。方法:对欧盟、欧洲经济区和欧洲自由贸易联盟国家的公开数据进行横断面收集,直到2024年8月,以便对hta - md制度进行跨国分析。如果国家至少有一个公共授权的hta - md机构,则将其包括在内。数据来源为科学数据库、机构网站和HTA机构文件。在文献综述的基础上,构建了一个包含16个要素的定性描述HTA-MDs制度化的框架,并将其用作凝聚层次聚类分析的数据集,以识别HTA-MDs制度化模式。结果:21个纳入的国家形成了三个集群:集群1以监管为重点,具有法律约束力的HTA-MDs系统为特色,具有确定报销决策的强制性评估;集群2的特征是监管职能、外部专家协作、正式的优先排序流程和有组织的水平扫描;聚类3显示推荐功能、非强制性评估和对报销决策的有限影响。结论:HTA-MDs机构可以通过实施评估的优先顺序流程、建立协作评估中心网络以及确保评估与报销决策之间的联系而受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信