Antimicrobial stewardship in regional hospitals: a human factors evaluation of barriers and facilitators and the role of technology.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bethany A Van Dort, Jane E Carland, Jonathan Penm, Angus Ritchie, Kate Morton, Nathan Chahoud, Melissa T Baysari
{"title":"Antimicrobial stewardship in regional hospitals: a human factors evaluation of barriers and facilitators and the role of technology.","authors":"Bethany A Van Dort, Jane E Carland, Jonathan Penm, Angus Ritchie, Kate Morton, Nathan Chahoud, Melissa T Baysari","doi":"10.1111/imj.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes aim to optimise antimicrobial prescribing. Regional hospitals have reduced access to resources that are essential for conducting AMS initiatives. Technology has the potential to reduce these challenges if implemented and used effectively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify the barriers and facilitators to successful AMS programmes in two regional hospitals in Australia and explore the role technology played in supporting AMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A contextual inquiry methodological approach was used, including observations and semi-structured interviews with AMS team members in two regional hospitals in Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observations were conducted for 27.5 h and interviews were performed with all AMS team members (n = 4). Electronic medication management and an antimicrobial dashboard were reported to make AMS processes efficient and information accessible. The use of multiple computerised systems and poor interoperability hindered AMS work processes. Executive support, resourcing and building rapport through in-person interactions were reported to influence the success of AMS programmes. Passionate and motivated infectious diseases (ID) consultants drove AMS programmes by building rapport with stakeholders and advocating for resources. COVID-19 was viewed as a facilitator of AMS as it increased the visibility of ID consultants, resulting in improved relationships and additional resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a small number of interoperable systems can enhance AMS, with tools such as an antimicrobial dashboard proving beneficial for remotely accessing information and reviewing antimicrobials in peripheral hospitals. Essential components for effective AMS programmes include supportive hospital executives and adequate staff resources. Sustaining AMS in regional settings relies on committed ID doctors and strong interdepartmental relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes aim to optimise antimicrobial prescribing. Regional hospitals have reduced access to resources that are essential for conducting AMS initiatives. Technology has the potential to reduce these challenges if implemented and used effectively.

Objective: Identify the barriers and facilitators to successful AMS programmes in two regional hospitals in Australia and explore the role technology played in supporting AMS.

Methods: A contextual inquiry methodological approach was used, including observations and semi-structured interviews with AMS team members in two regional hospitals in Australia.

Results: Observations were conducted for 27.5 h and interviews were performed with all AMS team members (n = 4). Electronic medication management and an antimicrobial dashboard were reported to make AMS processes efficient and information accessible. The use of multiple computerised systems and poor interoperability hindered AMS work processes. Executive support, resourcing and building rapport through in-person interactions were reported to influence the success of AMS programmes. Passionate and motivated infectious diseases (ID) consultants drove AMS programmes by building rapport with stakeholders and advocating for resources. COVID-19 was viewed as a facilitator of AMS as it increased the visibility of ID consultants, resulting in improved relationships and additional resources.

Conclusions: Using a small number of interoperable systems can enhance AMS, with tools such as an antimicrobial dashboard proving beneficial for remotely accessing information and reviewing antimicrobials in peripheral hospitals. Essential components for effective AMS programmes include supportive hospital executives and adequate staff resources. Sustaining AMS in regional settings relies on committed ID doctors and strong interdepartmental relationships.

区域医院抗菌剂管理:障碍和促进因素的人为因素评价以及技术的作用。
背景:抗菌药物管理(AMS)规划旨在优化抗菌药物处方。区域医院获得开展辅助医疗服务倡议所必需的资源的机会减少了。如果技术得到有效实施和使用,就有可能减少这些挑战。目的:确定澳大利亚两家地区医院辅助医疗方案成功的障碍和促进因素,并探讨技术在支持辅助医疗方案中所起的作用。方法:采用上下文调查方法,包括对澳大利亚两家地区医院的AMS团队成员进行观察和半结构化访谈。结果:进行了27.5小时的观察,并与所有AMS团队成员进行了访谈(n = 4)。据报道,电子药物管理和抗菌仪表板使AMS流程高效和信息可访问。多个计算机化系统的使用和互操作性差阻碍了医疗辅助队的工作进程。据报告,通过面对面的互动,行政支持、资源和建立关系对辅助医疗服务计划的成功产生了影响。热情和积极的传染病顾问通过与利益相关者建立关系和倡导资源,推动医疗辅助队的计划。COVID-19被视为AMS的推动者,因为它提高了身份识别顾问的知名度,从而改善了关系并获得了额外的资源。结论:使用少量可互操作的系统可以增强AMS,使用诸如抗菌仪表板之类的工具证明有利于远程访问信息和审查外围医院的抗菌药物。有效的辅助医疗服务方案的基本组成部分包括医院行政人员的支持和充足的工作人员资源。维持医疗辅助系统在区域设置依赖于忠诚的内科医生和强大的部门间关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信