Identifying key CT features and clinical variables for predicting operative management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) driveline infections.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mahati Mokkarala, Aravinda Ganapathy, Yuktesh Kalidindi, Chelsea R Schmitt, Mark J Hoegger, Ryan G Short, Demetrios A Raptis, David H Ballard
{"title":"Identifying key CT features and clinical variables for predicting operative management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) driveline infections.","authors":"Mahati Mokkarala, Aravinda Ganapathy, Yuktesh Kalidindi, Chelsea R Schmitt, Mark J Hoegger, Ryan G Short, Demetrios A Raptis, David H Ballard","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02363-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite technical advancements in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), driveline infections (DLIs) remain a common complication evaluated by CT. The purpose of this study was to assess CT imaging features and clinical variables associated with operative versus non-operative management of LVAD DLIs.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>This study analyzed 129 patients with LVAD driveline infections evaluated using CT. Two radiologists assessed CT scans for superficial and deep soft tissue stranding and fluid collections. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of operative management using imaging and clinical variables, guided by Akaike information criterion. Results were reported as odds ratios, and Interreader agreement was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative management was performed in 46.8% of patients. Positive driveline cultures (94.8% vs. 43.5%, p < 0.001) and new antibiotic use (98.3% vs. 72.7%, p < 0.001) were strongly associated with operative intervention. Mild subcutaneous fat stranding was the most frequent CT finding (62.6% and 66.9% by Readers 1 and 2, respectively), whereas deep fluid collections were rare (4.8-5.6%). Clinical predictors of operative management included new antibiotic use (p = 0.036), positive cultures (p < 0.001), and LVAD type. The resulting model achieved an AUC of 0.851 and overall accuracy of 78.6%. The absence of superficial fat stranding on CT significantly predicted non-operative management (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive driveline cultures, recent antibiotic initiation, and absence of skin or subcutaneous fat stranding on CT were associated with non-operative management in LVAD-related driveline infections. Absence of superficial fat stranding on CT may help distinguish suspected driveline infections that are unlikely to require surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02363-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite technical advancements in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), driveline infections (DLIs) remain a common complication evaluated by CT. The purpose of this study was to assess CT imaging features and clinical variables associated with operative versus non-operative management of LVAD DLIs.

Materials/methods: This study analyzed 129 patients with LVAD driveline infections evaluated using CT. Two radiologists assessed CT scans for superficial and deep soft tissue stranding and fluid collections. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of operative management using imaging and clinical variables, guided by Akaike information criterion. Results were reported as odds ratios, and Interreader agreement was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa.

Results: Operative management was performed in 46.8% of patients. Positive driveline cultures (94.8% vs. 43.5%, p < 0.001) and new antibiotic use (98.3% vs. 72.7%, p < 0.001) were strongly associated with operative intervention. Mild subcutaneous fat stranding was the most frequent CT finding (62.6% and 66.9% by Readers 1 and 2, respectively), whereas deep fluid collections were rare (4.8-5.6%). Clinical predictors of operative management included new antibiotic use (p = 0.036), positive cultures (p < 0.001), and LVAD type. The resulting model achieved an AUC of 0.851 and overall accuracy of 78.6%. The absence of superficial fat stranding on CT significantly predicted non-operative management (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Positive driveline cultures, recent antibiotic initiation, and absence of skin or subcutaneous fat stranding on CT were associated with non-operative management in LVAD-related driveline infections. Absence of superficial fat stranding on CT may help distinguish suspected driveline infections that are unlikely to require surgical intervention.

确定预测左心室辅助装置(LVAD)传动系统感染手术处理的关键CT特征和临床变量。
目的:尽管左心室辅助装置(lvad)技术进步,但传动系感染(DLIs)仍然是CT评估的常见并发症。本研究的目的是评估与手术与非手术治疗LVAD直连相关的CT影像特征和临床变量。材料/方法:本研究分析了129例LVAD传动系感染的CT评估。两名放射科医生评估了浅层和深层软组织搁浅和积液的CT扫描结果。以赤池信息标准为指导,采用Logistic回归分析影像学和临床变量,确定手术管理的预测因素。结果以比值比报告,使用Cohen's Kappa评估Interreader一致性。结果:46.8%的患者接受手术治疗。结论:lvad相关的驱动系统感染的非手术治疗与驱动系统培养阳性、近期开始使用抗生素、CT上没有皮肤或皮下脂肪滞留有关。CT上没有浅表脂肪滞留可能有助于区分疑似传动系统感染,这些感染不太可能需要手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信