Xiangyang Cheng, Xiao Zhang, Jie Zhang, Zhenhua Hu, Jiaqiang Zhang, Qiuyue Lian, Xibing Ding, Yanhua He, Muyan Shi, Yuhan Zhang, Ming Tian, Huarong Zheng, Zhilin Li, Yang Wang, Weifeng Yu, Jianlin Shao, Diansan Su
{"title":"Efficacy of a nasal mask oxygen kit versus regular nasal cannula in sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Xiangyang Cheng, Xiao Zhang, Jie Zhang, Zhenhua Hu, Jiaqiang Zhang, Qiuyue Lian, Xibing Ding, Yanhua He, Muyan Shi, Yuhan Zhang, Ming Tian, Huarong Zheng, Zhilin Li, Yang Wang, Weifeng Yu, Jianlin Shao, Diansan Su","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The incidence of hypoxia in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is not negligible. A nasal mask oxygen kit may reduce the incidence of hypoxia compared with a regular nasal cannula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-centre, randomised, open-label clinical trial took place from 1 September 2022 to 6 June 2023 in three Chinese teaching hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either the intervention or the control group. Before induction of anaesthesia, a nasal cannula was used in the control group, and a nasal mask oxygen kit was used in the intervention group. The primary outcome was hypoxia (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) ≥75% but <90% for <60 s). Secondary outcomes were subclinical respiratory depression (SpO<sub>2</sub>≥90% but <95%), severe hypoxia (SpO<sub>2</sub><75% or SpO<sub>2</sub>≥75% but <90% for ≥60 s) and other adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1204 initially enrolled patients, 1197 completed the study, with 597 randomised to the nasal mask oxygen kit group and 600 to the control group. Compared with the control group, the nasal mask oxygen kit significantly reduced the incidence of hypoxia during gastrointestinal endoscopy under sedation (12.5% vs 7.4%; rate difference (RD) = 0.051; 95% CI 0.018 to 0.085; p=0.003), subclinical respiratory depression (13% vs 9.4%; RD = 0.036; 95% CI 0.0005 to 0.072; p=0.047) and total adverse events (27.5% vs 18.6%; RD = 0.089; 95% CI 0.042 to 0.137; p<0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of severe hypoxia (1.17% vs 0.7%; RD = 0.005; 95% CI -0.006 to 0.016; p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nasal mask oxygen kit can decrease the incidence of hypoxia in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class I/II undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol and fentanyl sedation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05405530.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The incidence of hypoxia in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is not negligible. A nasal mask oxygen kit may reduce the incidence of hypoxia compared with a regular nasal cannula.
Methods: This multi-centre, randomised, open-label clinical trial took place from 1 September 2022 to 6 June 2023 in three Chinese teaching hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either the intervention or the control group. Before induction of anaesthesia, a nasal cannula was used in the control group, and a nasal mask oxygen kit was used in the intervention group. The primary outcome was hypoxia (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥75% but <90% for <60 s). Secondary outcomes were subclinical respiratory depression (SpO2≥90% but <95%), severe hypoxia (SpO2<75% or SpO2≥75% but <90% for ≥60 s) and other adverse events.
Results: Among the 1204 initially enrolled patients, 1197 completed the study, with 597 randomised to the nasal mask oxygen kit group and 600 to the control group. Compared with the control group, the nasal mask oxygen kit significantly reduced the incidence of hypoxia during gastrointestinal endoscopy under sedation (12.5% vs 7.4%; rate difference (RD) = 0.051; 95% CI 0.018 to 0.085; p=0.003), subclinical respiratory depression (13% vs 9.4%; RD = 0.036; 95% CI 0.0005 to 0.072; p=0.047) and total adverse events (27.5% vs 18.6%; RD = 0.089; 95% CI 0.042 to 0.137; p<0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of severe hypoxia (1.17% vs 0.7%; RD = 0.005; 95% CI -0.006 to 0.016; p>0.05).
Conclusions: The nasal mask oxygen kit can decrease the incidence of hypoxia in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class I/II undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol and fentanyl sedation.
目的:无痛胃镜检查中缺氧的发生率不容忽视。与常规鼻插管相比,鼻罩供氧套件可以减少缺氧的发生率。方法:该多中心、随机、开放标签临床试验于2022年9月1日至2023年6月6日在三家中国教学医院进行。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配到干预组和对照组。对照组在麻醉诱导前使用鼻插管,干预组使用鼻罩供氧包。主要结局为缺氧(外周毛细血管氧饱和度(SpO2)≥75%,2例≥90%,22例≥75%)。结果:在1204例初始入组患者中,1197例完成了研究,其中597例随机分配到鼻罩供氧套件组,600例随机分配到对照组。与对照组相比,鼻罩供氧试剂盒可显著降低镇静下胃肠内镜检查时缺氧的发生率(12.5% vs 7.4%;速率差(RD) = 0.051;95% CI 0.018 ~ 0.085;P =0.003),亚临床呼吸抑制(13% vs 9.4%;Rd = 0.036;95% CI 0.0005 ~ 0.072;P =0.047)和总不良事件(27.5% vs 18.6%;Rd = 0.089;95% CI 0.042 ~ 0.137;p0.05)。结论:在异丙酚和芬太尼镇静下,鼻罩供氧包可降低美国麻醉师学会I/II级胃肠内镜患者的缺氧发生率。试验注册号:NCT05405530。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.