Ultrasound-guided mandibular nerve block combined with superficial cervical plexus nerve block in patients undergoing radical surgery for tongue canceron: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yongjun Liu, Wenjie Sun, Shibiao Chen, Shiping Yin, Gaofeng Fan
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided mandibular nerve block combined with superficial cervical plexus nerve block in patients undergoing radical surgery for tongue canceron: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yongjun Liu, Wenjie Sun, Shibiao Chen, Shiping Yin, Gaofeng Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03219-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of bilateral mandibular nerve block and bilateral superficial cervical plexus nerve block under general anesthesia for patients undergoing extensive tongue cancer surgery. Given the considerable size of the surgical area and the prolonged duration associated with radical tongue cancer procedures, these factors significantly hinder postoperative recovery, particularly in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this study, 60 patients scheduled for elective radical tongue cancer surgery were enlisted. These individuals were methodically allocated into three distinct groups through randomization: a group receiving both mandibular and superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks (MC group, n = 20), a group receiving only the mandibular nerve block (M group, n = 20), and a group subjected solely to the superficial cervical plexus nerve block (C group, n = 20).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first 12 h postoperatively, VAS scores in groups M and C were significantly higher than those in group MC (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring activation of the patient-controlled analgesia pump was greater in groups M and C (45% and 55%, respectively) than in group MC (10%; P = 0.021). Postoperative MAP and HR increased above baseline in groups M and C, and both parameters were significantly elevated compared with group MC (P = 0.03). At the time of tongue incision, group C differed significantly from group M (mean difference, 95% CI 2.43-8.17; P < 0.001) and group MC (mean difference, 95% CI 4.33-10.07; P < 0.001). QOR-15 scores at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively were higher in group MC (91.10 ± 4.98 and 92.65 ± 4.88, respectively) than in group M (83.50 ± 5.89 and 87.95 ± 5.59; P < 0.001) and group C (83.15 ± 6.24 and 88.90 ± 5.63; P < 0.001). Intraoperative remifentanil and sufentanil consumption was lower in group MC than in groups M and C (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing ultrasound guidance for mandibular and superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks under general anesthesia substantially mitigates postoperative pain and enhances recovery rates following extensive tongue cancer surgeries, with no significant adverse effects observed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>China Clinical Trial Registration Center (registration number ChiCTR2400086380).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03219-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of bilateral mandibular nerve block and bilateral superficial cervical plexus nerve block under general anesthesia for patients undergoing extensive tongue cancer surgery. Given the considerable size of the surgical area and the prolonged duration associated with radical tongue cancer procedures, these factors significantly hinder postoperative recovery, particularly in elderly patients.

Methods: For this study, 60 patients scheduled for elective radical tongue cancer surgery were enlisted. These individuals were methodically allocated into three distinct groups through randomization: a group receiving both mandibular and superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks (MC group, n = 20), a group receiving only the mandibular nerve block (M group, n = 20), and a group subjected solely to the superficial cervical plexus nerve block (C group, n = 20).

Results: During the first 12 h postoperatively, VAS scores in groups M and C were significantly higher than those in group MC (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring activation of the patient-controlled analgesia pump was greater in groups M and C (45% and 55%, respectively) than in group MC (10%; P = 0.021). Postoperative MAP and HR increased above baseline in groups M and C, and both parameters were significantly elevated compared with group MC (P = 0.03). At the time of tongue incision, group C differed significantly from group M (mean difference, 95% CI 2.43-8.17; P < 0.001) and group MC (mean difference, 95% CI 4.33-10.07; P < 0.001). QOR-15 scores at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively were higher in group MC (91.10 ± 4.98 and 92.65 ± 4.88, respectively) than in group M (83.50 ± 5.89 and 87.95 ± 5.59; P < 0.001) and group C (83.15 ± 6.24 and 88.90 ± 5.63; P < 0.001). Intraoperative remifentanil and sufentanil consumption was lower in group MC than in groups M and C (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Utilizing ultrasound guidance for mandibular and superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks under general anesthesia substantially mitigates postoperative pain and enhances recovery rates following extensive tongue cancer surgeries, with no significant adverse effects observed.

Trial registration: China Clinical Trial Registration Center (registration number ChiCTR2400086380).

超声引导下下颌神经阻滞联合颈浅丛神经阻滞治疗舌癌根治性手术的随机对照试验
背景:本前瞻性随机对照试验评估了全麻下双侧下颌神经阻滞和双侧颈浅丛神经阻滞治疗广泛舌癌手术患者的效果。考虑到舌癌根治性手术的手术面积和持续时间较长,这些因素明显阻碍了术后恢复,尤其是老年患者。方法:本研究纳入60例计划行选择性舌癌根治性手术的患者。这些个体被随机分为三个不同的组:同时接受下颌神经阻滞和颈浅丛神经阻滞的组(MC组,n = 20),仅接受下颌神经阻滞的组(M组,n = 20),以及仅接受颈浅丛神经阻滞的组(C组,n = 20)。结果:术后前12 h, M组和C组的VAS评分均显著高于MC组(P)。结论:全麻下超声引导下颌骨和颈浅丛神经阻滞可显著减轻舌癌大范围手术术后疼痛,提高术后恢复率,无明显不良反应。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(注册号ChiCTR2400086380)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信