Improving the rates of inpatient HbA1c assessment and medication deintensification in people with diabetes and frailty.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ali Kareem, Hnin Lwin, Mohamed Fazil, Anu Thomas, Kevin Thottungal, Garima Gupta, Kashish Gera, Jawad Malik, Htet Lynn, Vishnusankar Umasankar, HayMar Tun, Aung Myo Naing, Sadaf Saeed, Meri Davitadze, Eka Melson, Alison Gallagher, Kath Higgins
{"title":"Improving the rates of inpatient HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessment and medication deintensification in people with diabetes and frailty.","authors":"Ali Kareem, Hnin Lwin, Mohamed Fazil, Anu Thomas, Kevin Thottungal, Garima Gupta, Kashish Gera, Jawad Malik, Htet Lynn, Vishnusankar Umasankar, HayMar Tun, Aung Myo Naing, Sadaf Saeed, Meri Davitadze, Eka Melson, Alison Gallagher, Kath Higgins","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive glucose management in people with diabetes and frailty presents significant risk which outweighs potential benefit. Hospital admission presents an opportunity for interventions that may reduce the impact of overtreatment in people with diabetes and frailty. Our previous study has shown low rates of glycated haemoglobin(HbA<sub>1c</sub>) assessment and inpatient medication deintensification in people with diabetes and frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a three-intervention quality improvement programme and studied the effectiveness of the interventions aiming to improve the inpatient HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessment and management of inpatients with diabetes and frailty. A baseline assessment was conducted prior to cycles 1 and 2, with another audit conducted post-cycles 1 and 2. A further audit was then carried out with another audit post-cycle 3.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Interventions 1 and 2 involved publishing an infographic to aid assessment and medication deintensification in patients with diabetes and frailty, followed by spreading awareness among resident doctors of the baseline audit results and the infographic via email and WhatsApp groups. Intervention 3 involved allocating 'Diafrailty Champion' the medical wards to help improve the assessment and management of patients with diabetes and frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 291 patients with diabetes and moderate-severe frailty were included in our audits (96 patients in baseline audit, 102 post-cycles 1 and 2 audit, 92 post-cycle 3 'Diafrailty Champion' audit). Improvements were observed for the rates of HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessment and deintensification in the post-interventions 1 and 2 audit, and these persisted following the introduction of 'Diafrailty Champion'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions that included raising awareness of the inpatient assessment and management of people with diabetes and frailty were successful in improving inpatient HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessment and deintensification rates. The improved HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessment and deintensification rates persist following the engagement of a resident doctor 'Diafrailty Champion'.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive glucose management in people with diabetes and frailty presents significant risk which outweighs potential benefit. Hospital admission presents an opportunity for interventions that may reduce the impact of overtreatment in people with diabetes and frailty. Our previous study has shown low rates of glycated haemoglobin(HbA1c) assessment and inpatient medication deintensification in people with diabetes and frailty.

Methods: We conducted a three-intervention quality improvement programme and studied the effectiveness of the interventions aiming to improve the inpatient HbA1c assessment and management of inpatients with diabetes and frailty. A baseline assessment was conducted prior to cycles 1 and 2, with another audit conducted post-cycles 1 and 2. A further audit was then carried out with another audit post-cycle 3.

Interventions: Interventions 1 and 2 involved publishing an infographic to aid assessment and medication deintensification in patients with diabetes and frailty, followed by spreading awareness among resident doctors of the baseline audit results and the infographic via email and WhatsApp groups. Intervention 3 involved allocating 'Diafrailty Champion' the medical wards to help improve the assessment and management of patients with diabetes and frailty.

Results: A total of 291 patients with diabetes and moderate-severe frailty were included in our audits (96 patients in baseline audit, 102 post-cycles 1 and 2 audit, 92 post-cycle 3 'Diafrailty Champion' audit). Improvements were observed for the rates of HbA1c assessment and deintensification in the post-interventions 1 and 2 audit, and these persisted following the introduction of 'Diafrailty Champion'.

Conclusions: Interventions that included raising awareness of the inpatient assessment and management of people with diabetes and frailty were successful in improving inpatient HbA1c assessment and deintensification rates. The improved HbA1c assessment and deintensification rates persist following the engagement of a resident doctor 'Diafrailty Champion'.

提高糖尿病和体弱多病患者住院HbA1c评估和降糖率。
背景:糖尿病和虚弱患者强化血糖管理存在显著的风险,其风险大于潜在的益处。住院为采取干预措施提供了机会,可以减少过度治疗对糖尿病和体弱多病患者的影响。我们之前的研究表明,糖尿病和体弱多病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)评估率和住院药物去强化率较低。方法:采用三干预质量改进方案,对改善住院糖尿病合并虚弱患者HbA1c评估与管理的干预效果进行研究。在周期1和2之前进行了基线评估,在周期1和2之后进行了另一次审计。然后在周期3后的另一次审计中进行了进一步审计。干预措施:干预措施1和2涉及发布信息图,以帮助糖尿病和虚弱患者进行评估和去强化用药,随后通过电子邮件和WhatsApp群向住院医生宣传基线审计结果和信息图。干预措施3包括分配“虚弱冠军”医疗病房,以帮助改善对糖尿病和虚弱患者的评估和管理。结果:共有291例糖尿病和中重度虚弱患者纳入我们的审计(基线审计96例,周期1和2后审计102例,周期3后“Diafrailty Champion”审计92例)。在干预后1和2审计中,观察到HbA1c评估率和去强化率的改善,并且在引入“Diafrailty Champion”后,这些改善仍然存在。结论:包括提高对糖尿病和虚弱患者住院评估和管理的认识在内的干预措施可成功提高住院患者HbA1c评估和去强化率。在住院医师“残疾冠军”的参与下,改善的HbA1c评估和去强化率持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信