Di Zhang, Yongjian Li, Tingting Liu, Xiaomin Liu, Jingru Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment regimens in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia.","authors":"Di Zhang, Yongjian Li, Tingting Liu, Xiaomin Liu, Jingru Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06495-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 151 newly diagnosed adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients during induction therapy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University to compare the efficacy and complications of different treatment regimens in low-to-intermediate-risk (WBC < 10 × 10⁹/L) and high-risk (WBC ≥ 10 × 10⁹/L) patients. Low-to-intermediate-risk patients were divided into three groups: ATRA + ATO dual induction (n = 18), ATRA + ATO + single-agent chemotherapy (n = 63), and ATRA + ATO + dual-agent chemotherapy (n = 18). High-risk patients were divided into two groups: ATRA + chemotherapy (n = 11) and ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy (n = 41). Results showed no significant differences in early mortality (0% vs. 3.17% vs. 5.56%), complete remission rates (94.44% vs. 96.83%), or molecular remission rates (94.44% vs. 100%) among low-to-intermediate-risk groups (P > 0.05). However, the dual induction group demonstrated superior relapse-free survival (100% vs. 93.65% vs. 88.89%) and lower rates of infection (66.67%) and hepatic dysfunction (22.22%), whereas the dual-agent chemotherapy group exhibited the highest infection (100%) and liver injury rates (61.11%) (P < 0.05). In high-risk patients, the ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy group showed significantly lower relapse rates (4.88% vs. 27.27%, P = 0.025) and higher overall survival (87.80% vs. 81.81%) compared to the ATRA + chemotherapy group. Complications analysis revealed myelosuppression (78.81%) and infections (83.44%) as the most common adverse events in low-to-intermediate-risk patients, with infections reaching 95.12% in high-risk patients. The dual induction group had a higher incidence of differentiation syndrome (5.56%) but lower risks of severe bleeding and DIC. For low-to-intermediate-risk APL patients during induction therapy, ATRA + ATO dual induction reduces relapse and hepatic toxicity but requires vigilance for differentiation syndrome. High-risk patients benefit from ATRA + ATO combined with chemotherapy to improve survival. Treatment should be individualized to balance efficacy and complications, with supportive care critical for mitigating infections and bleeding. This study provides clinical evidence for optimizing APL regimens in the chemotherapy-free era.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06495-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 151 newly diagnosed adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients during induction therapy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University to compare the efficacy and complications of different treatment regimens in low-to-intermediate-risk (WBC < 10 × 10⁹/L) and high-risk (WBC ≥ 10 × 10⁹/L) patients. Low-to-intermediate-risk patients were divided into three groups: ATRA + ATO dual induction (n = 18), ATRA + ATO + single-agent chemotherapy (n = 63), and ATRA + ATO + dual-agent chemotherapy (n = 18). High-risk patients were divided into two groups: ATRA + chemotherapy (n = 11) and ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy (n = 41). Results showed no significant differences in early mortality (0% vs. 3.17% vs. 5.56%), complete remission rates (94.44% vs. 96.83%), or molecular remission rates (94.44% vs. 100%) among low-to-intermediate-risk groups (P > 0.05). However, the dual induction group demonstrated superior relapse-free survival (100% vs. 93.65% vs. 88.89%) and lower rates of infection (66.67%) and hepatic dysfunction (22.22%), whereas the dual-agent chemotherapy group exhibited the highest infection (100%) and liver injury rates (61.11%) (P < 0.05). In high-risk patients, the ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy group showed significantly lower relapse rates (4.88% vs. 27.27%, P = 0.025) and higher overall survival (87.80% vs. 81.81%) compared to the ATRA + chemotherapy group. Complications analysis revealed myelosuppression (78.81%) and infections (83.44%) as the most common adverse events in low-to-intermediate-risk patients, with infections reaching 95.12% in high-risk patients. The dual induction group had a higher incidence of differentiation syndrome (5.56%) but lower risks of severe bleeding and DIC. For low-to-intermediate-risk APL patients during induction therapy, ATRA + ATO dual induction reduces relapse and hepatic toxicity but requires vigilance for differentiation syndrome. High-risk patients benefit from ATRA + ATO combined with chemotherapy to improve survival. Treatment should be individualized to balance efficacy and complications, with supportive care critical for mitigating infections and bleeding. This study provides clinical evidence for optimizing APL regimens in the chemotherapy-free era.
回顾性分析山东大学齐鲁医院151例初诊成人急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)患者在诱导治疗期间的临床资料,比较中低危(WBC 0.05)不同治疗方案的疗效及并发症。然而,双药诱导组表现出更高的无复发生存率(100% vs. 93.65% vs. 88.89%),更低的感染率(66.67%)和肝功能障碍(22.22%),而双药化疗组表现出最高的感染(100%)和肝损伤率(61.11%)(P
期刊介绍:
Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.