Development and Validation of Body Mass Index-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds in Postmenopausal Women : A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aaron K Aragaki, JoAnn E Manson, Erin S LeBlanc, Rowan T Chlebowski, Lesley F Tinker, Matthew A Allison, Bernhard Haring, Andrew O Odegaard, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, Nazmus Saquib, Kamal Masaki, Holly R Harris, Leah R Jager, Jennifer W Bea, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Garnet L Anderson
{"title":"Development and Validation of Body Mass Index-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds in Postmenopausal Women : A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Aaron K Aragaki, JoAnn E Manson, Erin S LeBlanc, Rowan T Chlebowski, Lesley F Tinker, Matthew A Allison, Bernhard Haring, Andrew O Odegaard, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, Nazmus Saquib, Kamal Masaki, Holly R Harris, Leah R Jager, Jennifer W Bea, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Garnet L Anderson","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A 2020 consensus statement proposed body mass index (BMI)-specific waist circumference (WC) thresholds to improve patient care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether stratifying BMI categories by BMI-specific WC thresholds improves mortality risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Women's Health Initiative multicenter, population-based U.S. study, with enrollment from 1993 to 1998 and follow-up through 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>139 213 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years were included in a development cohort (<i>n</i> = 67 774) and 2 external validation cohorts. Validation Cohort 1 had high prevalence of overweight or obesity (<i>n</i> = 48 335), and Validation Cohort 2 included diverse, geographically separate centers (<i>n</i> = 23 104).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Height, weight, and WC measured at enrollment. BMI categories were normal weight (18.5 to <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (25 to <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), obesity-1 (30 to <35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), obesity-2 (35 to <40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obesity-3 (≥40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), with further stratification by prespecified WC thresholds (≥80, ≥90, ≥105, ≥115, and ≥115 cm, respectively). Mortality was ascertained annually and was supplemented with serial National Death Index queries. Ten- and 20-year mortality prediction models that included BMI categories were compared to models with BMI categories stratified by WC thresholds using c-statistics and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median of 24 years of follow-up, 69 297 participants died. Multivariable-adjusted mortality risk was consistently greater for BMI categories with large WC than those with normal WC. Compared with women with normal weight and normal WC, women with normal or overweight BMI but large WC (hazard ratios [HRs], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.21] and 1.19 [CI, 1.15 to 1.24], respectively) had risk similar to those with obesity-1 but normal WC (HR, 1.12 [CI, 1.08 to 1.16]). Mortality associated with obesity-1 and large WC (HR, 1.45 [CI, 1.35 to 1.55]) was similar to that with obesity-3 and normal WC (HR, 1.40 [CI, 1.28 to 1.54]). Models with BMI-specific WC thresholds improved discrimination and risk stratification at 10 years for Validation Cohort 1; c-statistics improved by 0.7% (CI, 0.3% to 1.0%) to 61.3% (CI, 60.2% to 62.5%), and continuous NRI was 20.4% (CI, 17.3% to 23.6%). Results were mixed for Validation Cohort 2; risk stratification improved (continuous NRI, 12.3% [CI, 8.5% to 16.0%]), but not discrimination. Results were similar at 20 years.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The study did not include men or younger women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further stratifying BMI categories by WC thresholds modestly improved mortality risk stratification, with larger WC predicting greater mortality, although the degree of improvement varied by cohort. Discrimination did not improve consistently.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A 2020 consensus statement proposed body mass index (BMI)-specific waist circumference (WC) thresholds to improve patient care.

Objective: To determine whether stratifying BMI categories by BMI-specific WC thresholds improves mortality risk prediction.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Women's Health Initiative multicenter, population-based U.S. study, with enrollment from 1993 to 1998 and follow-up through 2021.

Participants: 139 213 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years were included in a development cohort (n = 67 774) and 2 external validation cohorts. Validation Cohort 1 had high prevalence of overweight or obesity (n = 48 335), and Validation Cohort 2 included diverse, geographically separate centers (n = 23 104).

Measurements: Height, weight, and WC measured at enrollment. BMI categories were normal weight (18.5 to <25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to <30 kg/m2), obesity-1 (30 to <35 kg/m2), obesity-2 (35 to <40 kg/m2), and obesity-3 (≥40 kg/m2), with further stratification by prespecified WC thresholds (≥80, ≥90, ≥105, ≥115, and ≥115 cm, respectively). Mortality was ascertained annually and was supplemented with serial National Death Index queries. Ten- and 20-year mortality prediction models that included BMI categories were compared to models with BMI categories stratified by WC thresholds using c-statistics and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results: Over a median of 24 years of follow-up, 69 297 participants died. Multivariable-adjusted mortality risk was consistently greater for BMI categories with large WC than those with normal WC. Compared with women with normal weight and normal WC, women with normal or overweight BMI but large WC (hazard ratios [HRs], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.21] and 1.19 [CI, 1.15 to 1.24], respectively) had risk similar to those with obesity-1 but normal WC (HR, 1.12 [CI, 1.08 to 1.16]). Mortality associated with obesity-1 and large WC (HR, 1.45 [CI, 1.35 to 1.55]) was similar to that with obesity-3 and normal WC (HR, 1.40 [CI, 1.28 to 1.54]). Models with BMI-specific WC thresholds improved discrimination and risk stratification at 10 years for Validation Cohort 1; c-statistics improved by 0.7% (CI, 0.3% to 1.0%) to 61.3% (CI, 60.2% to 62.5%), and continuous NRI was 20.4% (CI, 17.3% to 23.6%). Results were mixed for Validation Cohort 2; risk stratification improved (continuous NRI, 12.3% [CI, 8.5% to 16.0%]), but not discrimination. Results were similar at 20 years.

Limitation: The study did not include men or younger women.

Conclusion: Further stratifying BMI categories by WC thresholds modestly improved mortality risk stratification, with larger WC predicting greater mortality, although the degree of improvement varied by cohort. Discrimination did not improve consistently.

Primary funding source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

绝经后妇女体重指数特异性腰围阈值的发展和验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:2020年共识声明提出了身体质量指数(BMI)特定腰围(WC)阈值以改善患者护理。目的:确定以BMI特异性WC阈值对BMI分类进行分层是否能提高死亡风险预测。设计:前瞻性队列研究。背景:美国妇女健康倡议多中心、基于人群的研究,入组时间为1993年至1998年,随访至2021年。参与者:139 213名年龄在50至79岁的绝经后妇女被纳入一个发展队列(n = 67 774)和2个外部验证队列。验证队列1有高超重或肥胖患病率(n = 48335),验证队列2包括不同的、地理上独立的中心(n = 23104)。测量:入学时测量的身高、体重和腰围。BMI分类为正常体重(18.5 ~ 2)、超重(25 ~ 2)、肥胖-1(30 ~ 2)、肥胖-2(35 ~ 2)和肥胖-3(≥40 kg/m2),并根据预先设定的WC阈值(分别为≥80、≥90、≥105、≥115和≥115 cm)进一步分层。每年确定死亡率,并辅以国家死亡指数系列查询。采用c统计和连续净重分类改善(NRI),将包括BMI类别的10年和20年死亡率预测模型与按WC阈值分层的BMI类别模型进行比较。结果:在平均24年的随访中,6297名参与者死亡。多变量调整后的死亡风险在体重指数类别中,腰围大的人始终高于腰围正常的人。与体重和腰围正常的女性相比,BMI正常或超重但腰围大的女性(风险比[HR],分别为1.17 [95% CI, 1.12 ~ 1.21]和1.19 [CI, 1.15 ~ 1.24])的风险与肥胖-1但腰围正常的女性相似(HR, 1.12 [CI, 1.08 ~ 1.16])。与肥胖-1和大腰围相关的死亡率(HR, 1.45 [CI, 1.35 ~ 1.55])与肥胖-3和正常腰围相关的死亡率(HR, 1.40 [CI, 1.28 ~ 1.54])相似。具有bmi特异性WC阈值的模型在验证队列1中改善了10年的区分和风险分层;c-statistics改善了0.7% (CI, 0.3% ~ 1.0%) ~ 61.3% (CI, 60.2% ~ 62.5%),持续NRI为20.4% (CI, 17.3% ~ 23.6%)。验证队列2的结果是混合的;风险分层得到改善(连续NRI, 12.3% [CI, 8.5%至16.0%]),但没有歧视。20岁时的结果相似。局限性:该研究没有包括男性或年轻女性。结论:进一步通过腰围阈值对BMI分类进行分层,可适度改善死亡率风险分层,腰围越大,死亡率越高,尽管改善程度因队列而异。歧视并没有持续改善。主要资金来源:国家卫生研究院的国家心脏、肺和血液研究所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信